子どもどまんなか「政策」？！の偽り。

コロナ禍ではまさに「子ども」」ではなく、「高齢者どまんなか」政策であった。
子どもの健全な成長を阻害する～それはまた大学生に至るまで～不健全な「子ども隅っこ政策」であった。
なぜなら「高齢者に罹スト大変だから」という。高齢者の命を助けるという美名で子どもたちの健やかな成長を壊した。
黙食、前を向いて食べる、友人との会話（おしゃべり）や遊びの制限、家庭の困窮・・・。当初は子どもは無害に近い風邪症状だったので、そこは自由にさせてやるべきだった。（現在では普通にインフルエンザの症状が出ている）
大学生はもっと悲惨で、大学進学で地方から東京へ出てきた若者の「キャンパスライフ」「サークル活動」「バイト」「大学生らしい青春の営み」「恋愛」「出会い」・・・すべてを奪った。これも「高齢者にうつすと大変だから」という理由。
しかし数字で見てみると（厚労省や広島県医療チームの数字を参照に）、本来の寿命年数とほぼ同じ年代の方が無くなっているだけ。むしろそうなるべき高齢者を無理矢理延命させて亡くなる方一時的減った。（そのリバウンドで後で増える・・・当たり前だが寿命は公平にある）
多感なこどもの３年は高齢者のいや大人の１０年にも２０年にも匹敵する。思春期だった子、大学時代をフルリモートで過ごしてきた人、彼らが成人になった時性格形成、人格形成にどんな影響が現れるのだろうか？
全部、「大人の責任」。いわゆる「専門家」「TVメディア→昨今の週刊誌報道を垂れ流す姿勢も同じ」「政治家、小池都知事やそれに追従した県知事など」・・・彼らは総括し少子化が進行したことを反省したのだろうか？（少子化が進行したことは数字で顕著。当たり前だが、会うな、遠距離恋愛するな、飲みに行くな、濃厚接触するな、距離をとれ・・・子どもを産むどころか出会うこともできん。（これは今言ってるのでなく、初期から看護師の知り合いとずっと言ってたことだ）
当初はどんな病気か分からなかった？？不思議なことを言う。当初から風邪（もちろん「風邪は万病のもと、拗らせて肺炎で無くなる方は一定数いた）以上インフルエンザ程度。そういう専門家もいた。
ではなぜ「そう思うのか」？
実は知り合いの旅館が前日まで「武漢」の客を宿泊させていた（まだ武漢という地名さえ知らなかった）が、誰ひとりコロナにはならず、後日ニュースになりはじめてからもそこからは出なかった。（これは「肩こり」という概念がない国では「肩こり」が無いとは違うけれど）
また、病院でも例年のインフルエンザ相当で対応していれば（発熱外来などない！）、無駄に膨大な税金を使うことも、保健所や役場の職員を「聴き取り」という中途半端で目詰まりさせる労働で疲弊させることも無かった（まあ、残業代はたんまり出たが）。待機することでむしろ悪化したり、陽性というだけでたらい回しにされたり、妊婦が普通に分娩できず手遅れとなったりして「死んだ」人の（死ななくて良かったのに無駄な規制のせいで）責任を政治家は、専門家は、メディアは取れるのか？万死に値しないのか？
総括も無ければ反省もない。一方の意見だけで異論をで公平を保つこともしなかった。
本当に一部の医者どまんなか政策・主義で、子どもたちの生活を顧みない政治誘導だった。萩生田氏が学校を再開させたことは評価している。（安倍氏の学校全校休校のインパクトが強すぎた）

県をまたぐな、飲みに行くな、しゃべるな、濃厚接触するな、キープディスタンス！まさに少子化促進運動ではないか？現に少子化がいっぺんに数年分進んだ。そのくせ「子ども家庭庁」とか「異次元の少子化対策」なんて片腹痛い。責任所在が曖昧なのは風土なのだろうか・・・・。

少子化は進むので人口減でも成り立つ社会を考える時期に来ている。他自治体よりいち早く取り組むことが自治体間競争に勝つためには必要。

※麻疹、水疱瘡、おたふく風邪の３つは幼稚園に通っていれば必ず罹患する儀式みたいなものだった。むしろ「大人になって罹ると大変だから、子どもの内に罹っておかないと・・」という風潮だった。コロナ禍では、どの専門家もそんな事例を一つも言わず、コロナ明けにいろんな病気が流行っています・・・という。もう、なんだか。

※人口減：流入・流出は毎年上下するが大した数ではない。また生まれてくる子はコロナで減ったが見える数字。人口減で一番大きな数字は「自然減」だ。２０人くらい増えても２００人亡くなるという時代が団塊の世代が去るまで続く。それを前提に観光振興、地域活性化、地方創生を考えないと前提が怪しくなる。裏を返せば、それを言わない自治体やコンサルタントは胡散臭い。行政が合コンの幹事をやり「街コン」なんて馬鹿げているものの一つ。あなたの町ではやっていないだろうか？

広島では「とんど」、東北では「どんと」、関東では「どんど」！という３変形。

“Policy” for children? ! lie of

During the coronavirus pandemic, the policy was to focus not on "children" but on "elderly people". It was an unhealthy ``children's corner policy'' that inhibited the healthy growth of children, even down to university students. This is because ``the elderly are more susceptible to the disease.'' In the name of saving the lives of the elderly, they destroyed the healthy growth of children. Eating in silence, eating while facing forward, restrictions on conversation (chatting) and play with friends, poverty at home... At first, the child's symptoms were a harmless cold, so they should have been left alone. (Nowadays, flu symptoms are common.) The situation is even more dire for university students, who have come to Tokyo from rural areas to attend university and are struggling with their ``campus life,'' ``club activities,'' ``part-time jobs,'' ``the activities of youth typical of university students.'' Love, encounters, everything was taken away from me. This is also because ``it would be difficult to infect the elderly.'' However, if you look at the numbers (refer to figures from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and the Hiroshima Prefectural Medical Team), people in the same age group as their original life expectancy are disappearing. In fact, the number of elderly people dying due to forced prolongation of their lives has temporarily decreased. (The rebound increases later on...naturally, but life expectancy is fair.) Three years for an impressionable child is comparable to 10 or 20 years for an elderly person, or even an adult. For children who were adolescents and those who spent their university years fully remote, what kind of impact will there be on their character and personality development when they become adults? Everything is the responsibility of adults. So-called "experts", "TV media have the same attitude of disseminating recent weekly magazine reports", "politicians, Tokyo Governor Koike and the prefectural governors who followed her"...they all sum up the fact that the declining birthrate has progressed. Did he reflect? (The decline in the birthrate is clearly visible in the numbers. It goes without saying, but don't meet up, don't have long-distance relationships, don't go out drinking, don't have close contact, keep your distance... you can't even meet people, let alone have children.) (I'm not saying this now, but I've been saying this with a nurse acquaintance since the beginning.) At the beginning, I didn't know what kind of illness it was. (There were a certain number of people who died of pneumonia after getting sick) It was more than just influenza.There were experts who said so.Then why do you think so?Actually, the inn I knew had been hosting guests from Wuhan until the day before ( (I didn't even know the name of the place Wuhan yet), but no one got infected with the coronavirus, and even after it started appearing on the news later, no one got out of there. (This means that in countries where there is no concept of "stiff shoulders" In addition, if hospitals were to deal with the same level of influenza as in previous years (there would be no outpatient clinic for fevers!), they would not have to waste a huge amount of taxpayers' money, but instead would do half-hearted "interviews" with public health center and public office staff. I didn't have to exhaust myself with labor that was clogging me up (well, I had to pay a lot of overtime).In fact, waiting made things worse, people were sent around just because they tested positive, and pregnant women weren't able to give birth normally. Can politicians, experts, and the media take responsibility for people who "died" because it's too late (because of useless regulations when they shouldn't have died)?Aren't they worth dying for?Summary too. If not, there would be no remorse. They would only disagree with one side's opinion and not maintain fairness. It was really a policy and doctrine that was centered around some doctors, and was a political inducement that did not care about the lives of children. Mr. Hagiuda closed the school. I appreciate that they reopened the school. (The impact of Mr. Abe's decision to close all schools was too strong.)

Don't cross prefectures, don't go drinking, don't talk, don't have close contact, keep distance! Isn't this a movement to promote a declining birthrate? In fact, the declining birthrate has progressed by several years all at once. On the other hand, I am disappointed in the ``Children and Families Agency'' and ``different-level countermeasures against the declining birthrate.'' I wonder if it's because of the corporate culture that the place of responsibility is ambiguous...

As the birthrate continues to decline, the time has come to consider creating a society that can survive even with a declining population. In order to win the competition among local governments, it is necessary to take action sooner than other local governments.

*Measles, chicken pox, and mumps were all three diseases that children were bound to contract if they attended kindergarten. Rather, the trend was that ``it would be difficult for adults to contract the disease, so we should prevent it from occurring in children.'' No expert has mentioned a single case of such a situation during the coronavirus pandemic, and they say that various diseases are becoming more prevalent after the coronavirus outbreak. It's kind of like that already.

*Population decline: The inflow and outflow go up and down every year, but the numbers are not large. The number of children being born has decreased due to the coronavirus, but the numbers are still visible. The biggest figure in population decline is "natural decline." Even if the number of deaths increases by about 20, 200 people will die, which will continue until the baby boomer generation leaves. Unless tourism promotion, regional revitalization, and regional revitalization are considered based on this premise, the premise becomes questionable. On the other hand, local governments and consultants who do not say so are suspicious. It's one of those ridiculous things where the government acts as the organizer of a group party and calls it a ``town party''. Isn't it done in your town?