パラレルワールド新聞:　「What does a change in House speaker mean for Ukraine aid?」　＜ー下院議長関連のお話です　

今回は「What does a change in House speaker mean for Ukraine aid?」についてコメントさせていただきます。

先日、下院議長が変わったらウクライナ支援はどうなのよ、とコメントしましたがCBSでも話題に、ということですね：　↓

CBS News: 8 Oct,2023

「What does a change in House speaker mean for Ukraine aid?」

The future of aid to Ukraine hangs in the balance as House Republicans debate who will be their next speaker.
＆
The selection of a successor to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy will play a big role in funding the U.S. provides to Ukraine. The White House and many lawmakers want additional funding to be passed while Congress will be hammering out its spending bills to avoid a mid-November government shutdown. But for now, Congress is paralyzed without an elected speaker.

なんですよ～。

Ukraine has become an increasingly contentious issue in the Republican conference, where hardline conservatives hold outsized sway. 

ウクライナは焦っているでしょう。

After McCarthy was ousted Tuesday, President Biden expressed concern over the future of aid to Ukraine, and said he plans to make a "major speech" on Ukraine at a yet-to-be-announced date. The president did not directly answer how much longer the U.S. can fund Ukraine without additional authority from Congress.

大統領側にはデープステイトがついていると思われ、本来は無限大に支援したいはずですが、今回の議長が変わったので「？」となりました

GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, who announced his candidacy Wednesday…Asked whether he'd put a Ukraine package on the floor if he's elected speaker, he replied, "I'm against that," and added that "the most pressing issue on Americans' minds is not Ukraine, it's the border situation and crime on the streets," he told reporters Wednesday. "So let's address those."

ある意味、現実的。

Republicans for Ukraine, a pro-Ukraine project of the conservative nonprofit group Defending Democracy Together, gave Jordan an "F" on its congressional report card on his overall support of Ukraine, noting that in six votes for Ukraine aid, he supported only the first and voted no on the rest.

つまり、米国はこれからもっと荒れるでしょう。

.The good news is basically we can probably support Ukraine the way we've been supporting Ukraine for the next couple months, but then the money's gone," and the president can't give Ukraine the ammunition and supplies it will desperately need, said Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
＆
Without U.S. assistance, Ukraine could run out of ammunition in the dead of winter, he said. If Ukrainians can't rely on being resupplied with air defense munitions, then they will have to choose between protecting their population and protecting troops on the front lines, he said. "And that means a lot of Ukrainians are likely going to die."

パラレルワールドでも同じ考えです。実現したらどうすんのよ？　という感じです。

it'll cost a lot of lives and be incredibly costly for the reconstruction of Ukraine ... worst of all, it may potentially turn the tide of war," Bergmann said.

うぅ～

The president told reporters Wednesday there may be another way to assist Ukraine financially without additional support from Congress, but he didn't elaborate.

このあたりが、下院議会の力ですね。

The U.S. has already given approximately $113 billion in security, humanitarian and economic assistance to Ukraine since Russia's war began.　

2023年10月8日現在、米国はウクライナに対して軍事支援、人道支援、経済支援などを含む総額約11兆円の支援で、米国一国で日本の軍事予算のほぼ2倍の額です、で？　これから中東でも問題が大きくなれば、アジアに手は回らないでしょう。

台湾有事で米国は当てにできないとパラレルワールドの住民は考えています。

また、風のうわさで、タイミングをみるとハマスとイスラエルの件も下院議長の件と関連性がある気もします。　つまり、ハマス支援の国が米国へ揺さぶりをかけている可能性が濃厚ともパラレルワールドでは考えられています。

検索キー:　What does a change in House speaker mean for Ukraine aid?