ウクライナ速報【英紙タイムズがスクープしたロシア連邦保安庁のリーク文書がこれです】（後半）英字怪文書

※本投稿記事は真偽不明なフェイク記事です。ご注意ください※

 

 

 

 

★★★★★ロシア連邦保安庁のリーク内部文書（後半）

執筆者：元ロシア連邦保安庁官員であるかもしれん

英語翻訳：ジャーナリストChristo Grozev氏

日本語翻訳：俺氏、イケメンいやフツメンであるかもしれん

 

 

【Christo Grozev氏とはブルガリアの調査ジャーナリスト、1969年5月20日生まれ、メディア専門家、メディア投資家でもあり、ベリングキャット（イギリスの調査報道ウェブサイト）のロシア調査主任、安全保障上の脅威、域外の秘密工作、情報の武器化に焦点を当てている。

2018年に英国で起きたノビチョク剤毒殺事件の容疑者の身元に関する調査により、彼と彼のチームは調査報道に関する欧州報道賞を受賞した。Grozevは、オープンソース、ソーシャルメディア、その他の利用可能なデータを調査に使用することで知られています。

オーストリアのウィーンを拠点に、彼は特に、2014年のマレーシア航空17便の撃墜に関連する2人のロシア高官、2016年のモンテネグロのクーデター計画に関与したGRU将校、2018年のセルゲイとユリアのスクリパレス容疑者の3つの毒殺、2020年のアレクセイナバルニ氏の中毒などを識別する調査を執筆しています。】

 

◆以下本文（後半）◆（ロシア語原文のままで加筆修正しておりません）

 

18. 包囲され続ける？ここ数十年の同じヨーロッパでの軍事紛争の経験（ここではセルビアが最大の実験場）によると、都市は何年も包囲され、機能さえすることができる。ヨーロッパからの人道的輸送隊は時間の問題である。

19. 私たちは6月という条件付の期限を設けている。条件付きとは、6月になると経済がなくなり、何も残らないからだ。大体、来週にはどちらかに転機が訪れるだろう。単に、このような過緊張の状況にはなり得ないからだ。分析はありません - それは混乱を計算することは不可能である、ここでは誰も確かに何も言うことはできません。直感的に、さらには感情で行動する - しかし、これはあなたのためのポーカーではありません。しかし、これはあなたのためのポーカーではありません。突然、いくつかのオプションが通過することを期待して、金利が上昇します。問題は、我々も計算を誤り、一手ですべてを失う可能性が出てきたことだ。

20. 大体、この国には出口がない。可能性のある勝利のオプションがなく、敗北がすべて、まったく出撃していないだけだ。彼らは100％、前世紀の初めに、弱い日本を蹴落として手っ取り早く勝利を得ようと考えたら、陸軍が大変なことになった、ということを繰り返した。そして、最後まで戦争を続け、ボルシェビキを「再教育」のために軍隊に入れ始めた--なにしろ、彼らは大衆の誰にとっても興味のない、はみ出し者なのだから。そして、誰にも知られていないボルシェビキが、反戦スローガンを掲げて、こんな風に始まった．

21.

22. プロから：「罰金箱」を前線に大量に送り込むというヒントさえも通らないように、あらゆる手を尽くした。そこに囚人や「社会的に信頼できない」政治犯を送る（国内の水に手をつけないように）-軍隊の士気はただただマイナスに向かうだろう。そして、敵はやる気満々です、ひどくやる気満々です。彼は戦い方を知っている、そこには十分な中堅指揮官がいる。武器もある。支援もある。我々は、単に世界の人的損失の前例となるであろう。それで終わりです。

23. 最も恐れていること：トップは、古い問題と新しい問題を重ね合わせるというルールに従って行動する。大きくはこのような理由で、2014年のドンバスが始まった--クリミアでのロシアの春の話題から欧米人の注意をそらす必要があったので、ドンバスの危機は、すべての注意を自分に引きつけて、交渉の対象となるべきだったようだ。しかし、さらに大きな問題があった。そして、エルドアンをサウスストリームの4本のパイプに押し込むことを決め、シリアに入った--これはソレイマニが問題解決のために意図的に偽の入力をした後である。その結果、クリミアの問題は解決できず、ドンバスの問題もあり、サウスストリームは2パイプに縮小し、シリアは別の頭痛の種をぶらさげた（出ればアサドを解体され、馬鹿にされるが、座ることも困難で無駄である）。

24. ウクライナ電撃戦」なんて誰が思いついたんだろう。本当の入門情報があれば、少なくとも当初の計画には賛否両論あること、多くの再確認が必要であることを示すはずだ。いろいろとね。今、私たちは首から上の部分に糞をした。そして、何をすべきかは明らかではありません。「脱亜入欧」や「脱軍事化」は分析的なカテゴリーではない。なぜなら、任務の達成度や未達成度を判断するための明確なパラメーターが存在しないからである。

25. 今、それはいくつかのクソアドバイザーがいくつかの制裁を減らすために要求するヨーロッパとの紛争を開始するためにトップを説得することが見られるままである。あるいは削減か、戦争か。もし彼らが拒否したら？1939年のヒトラーのように、本当の国際紛争に巻き込まれる可能性は排除できない。そして、その時、我々のZは鉤十字で比較されることになるだろう。

26. 局地的な核攻撃の可能性はあるのでしょうか？あります。軍事的な目的ではなく（これは防衛のための画期的な武器です）、他者を威嚇する目的で行われます。同時に、すべてをウクライナに向けるための土壌が準備されている。ナリシキンと彼のSVRは今、そこで密かに核兵器を作ったことを証明するために、地球を掘っているのだ。くそっ、彼らは今、我々が長い間研究し、解体してきたものを叩いているのだ。ここでは膝の上で証拠を描くことはできないし、専門家やウランの存在（ウクライナには劣化した同位体238がたくさんある）は何の意味もないのだ。そこでは生産サイクルがあるので、無闇にできないのです。ダーティ」な爆弾も気づかないうちに作れないのに、古い原発で兵器級のプルトニウムを生産できる（REB-1000のような原発では反応の「副産物」として極少量生産）--だからアメリカはIAEAを巻き込んでそこにそういう管理を導入した、この話題にしゃぶりつくのはバカだ、ということです。

27. 来週はどうなるかわかりますか？まあ、2回目以降も。今、私たちは空腹の90年代を見逃し始めるように、それは私たちをカバーします。オークションが終了している間、ナビウリナは通常のステップを踏んでいるように見えたが、これはすべて、ダムの穴を指で塞ぐようなものである。しかし、これはダムの穴を指で塞ぐようなものだ。ダムはまだ決壊し、さらに強くなる。3日後、5日後、10日後、何も決まらない。

28. カディロフは理由があって蹄を打つ-そこには自分たちの冒険がある。彼は最も影響力のある無敵のイメージを自分のために作り上げた。そして、それが一度でも倒れれば、自らの民衆によって倒されることになる。彼はもはや勝利のティップの持ち主ではないだろう。

29. 我々はさらに前進する。シリアを。"奴らは持ちこたえるだろう、ウクライナで全てが終わる-そしてそこでシリアで我々は再び全ての陣地を強化する" そして今、いつでも、彼らは資源を使い果たすためにコンテントをそこに待つことができます - そしてそのような熱は設定されます... トルコは海峡を封鎖する-飛行機でそこに物資を輸送するために、それはお金でオーブンを加熱するようなものです。

30. このすべてが同時に起こっていることに注目してほしい。私たちには、すべてを一つの山にまとめる時間さえない。43～44年のドイツのような状況になっているのです。すぐにスタートで。この過労からすでに迷子になっていることもあり、すべてが夢であったと思えることもあり、すべてが以前と同じであると思えることもある。

31.

32. ところで牢屋では、もっとひどいことになる。今ナットは、血まみれのイコールにように締め始めるでしょう。どこもかしこも。正直なところ、純粋に技術的に、これは状況を維持するための唯一のチャンスです - 私たちはすでに総動員のモードになっています。しかし、そんな体制で長くはいられないし、タイミングもあいまいで、当面は悪くなる一方だろう。動員から、経営は必ず迷走する。そう、そして想像してみてください、スナッチで100メートル走れるのに、マラソンの距離まで行って思いっきりジャークを出すのはまずいですよね。ここでは、百メートルを走るように、ウクライナの質問で急ぎ、クロスカントリーのマラソンに合わせました。

33. と、いうのが、ごくごく簡単な話です。

34. 皮肉屋から、私はVVプーチンが全世界を破壊する赤いボタンを押すとは思っていないことだけは付け加えておく。

35. まず、決定を下すのは一人ではなく、少なくとも誰かが飛び降りることになる。そして、そこには多くの人がいる。「一人用の赤いボタン」は存在しない。

36. 第2に、そこではすべてがうまく機能しているかどうか、疑問がある。経験上、透明性と管理性が高ければ高いほど、欠点を発見しやすくなる。そして、誰がどのようにコントロールしているのかが明確でないところでは、常に華麗な報告がなされる-そこでは、すべてが常に間違っているのだ。赤いボタンのシステムが宣伝通り機能しているかどうかはわからない。さらに、プルトニウムの装荷は10年ごとに変えなければならない。

 37. 第三に、これは最も下劣で悲しいことですが、私は個人的に、連盟評議会のメンバーではなく、彼の最も近い代表や大臣を自分に近づけさせない人の、自分を犠牲にする覚悟を信じません。コロナウイルスや攻撃を恐れて、それは問題ではありません。最も信頼できる人を近づけるのが怖いのなら、どうやって自分や愛する人を滅ぼす勇気があるのでしょうか、包括的に。

38. 何かあれば - 尋ねるが、私は数日間答えることができません。我々はラッシュモードであり、より多くのタスクがあります。

39. 一般的に、私たちのレポートは、元気ですが、すべてがpi_duで飛ぶ。

40. 今まで、このグラグ.ネットのソースが悪態をついたことはなく、短く、要点を絞って書いている。しかし、今でも彼は...

 

 

【前半はこちらへhttps://note.com/yuhkikun/n/nb3e1a949f6c0

※どちらも英紙タイムズがスクープした真偽不明のフェイクニュースです】

 

 

 

1.  18+ One of the insiders from the special services of the Russian Federation, I will publish without edits and censorship, because this is hell: “I’ll be honest right away: I have hardly slept all these days, almost all the time at work, my head is a little floating, like in a fog. And from overwork, sometimes I already catch states, as if all this is not real.

2.  To be honest, the Pandora's box is open - a real global horror will begin by the summer - global famine is inevitable (Russia and Ukraine were the main suppliers of grain in the world, this year's harvest will be smaller, and logistical problems will bring the catastrophe to a peak point).

3.  I can't tell you what guided those at the top when deciding on the operation, but now they are methodically lowering all the dogs on us (the Service). We are scolded for analytics - this is very in my profile, so I will explain what is wrong.

4.  Recently, we have been increasingly pressed to customize reports to the requirements of management - I once touched on this topic. All these political consultants, politicians and their retinue, influence teams - all this created chaos. Strong.

5.  Most importantly, no one knew that there would be such a war, they hid it from everyone. And here's an example for you: you are asked (conditionally) to calculate the possibility of human rights protection in different conditions, including the attack of prisons by meteorites. You specify about meteorites, they tell you - this is so, reinsurance for calculations, nothing like this will happen. You understand that the report will be just for show, but you need to write in a victorious style so that there are no questions, they say, why do you have so many problems, did you really work badly. In general, a report is being written that when a meteorite falls, we have everything to eliminate the consequences, we are great, everything is fine. And you concentrate on tasks that are real - we don’t have enough strength anyway. And then suddenly they really throw meteorites and expect that everything will be according to your analytics, which was written from the bulldozer.

6.  That is why we have a total piz_ets - I don’t even want to pick another word. There is no protection from sanctions for the same reason: well, it’s quite possible that Nabiullina will be sewn up with negligence (rather, the switchmen from her team), but what are they to blame for? No one knew that there would be such a war, so no one prepared for such sanctions. This is the reverse side of secrecy: since no one was told, then who could calculate what no one told about?

7.   

8.  Kadyrov is going crazy. And the conflict almost started with us: perhaps even the Ukrainians threw in misinformation that it was we who handed over the routes of Kadyrov's special forces in the first days of the operation. They were covered there on the march in a terrible way, they had not yet begun to fight, but they were simply torn to pieces in some places. And off we go: it was the FSB that leaked the routes to the Ukrainians. I do not have such information, I will leave 1-2% for reliability (it cannot be completely ruled out either).

9.  Blitzkrieg failed. It is simply impossible to complete the task now: if Zelensky and the authorities were captured in the first 1-3 days, they seized all the key buildings in Kyiv, they gave them the order to surrender - yes, the resistance would subside to the minimum values. In theory. But what's next? Even with this ideal variant, there was an unsolvable problem: with whom to negotiate? If we demolish Zelensky, well, with whom should we sign agreements? If with Zelensky, then after we demolish it, these papers are worth nothing. Opposition Platform for Life refused to cooperate: Medvedchuk is a coward, he fled. There is a second leader there - Boyko, but he refuses to work with us - even his own people will not understand him. They wanted to return Tsarev, so even our pro-Russians turned against him. Return Yanukovych? But as? If we say that it is impossible to occupy, then any of our authorities will be killed there in 10 minutes, as we leave. Occupy? Where are we going to get so many people? Commandant's offices, military police, counterintelligence, security - even with minimal resistance from the locals, we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist.

10. What now? We cannot announce mobilization for two reasons:

11. 1) Large-scale mobilization will undermine the situation inside the country: political, economic, social.

12. 2) Our logistics are already overstretched today. We will drive a many times larger contingent, and what will we get? Ukraine is a hefty country in terms of territory. And now the level of hatred towards us is going through the roof. Our roads simply won't be able to handle such supply caravans - everything will come to a standstill. And we won't manage to pull it out - because it's chaos.

13. And these two reasons fall out at the same time, although even one is enough to break everything off.

14.  

15. Losses: I don't know how many there are. Nobody knows. For the first two days there was still control, now no one knows what is going on there. You can lose large units in communication. They can be found, or they can dissolve due to being attacked. And there, even the commanders may not know how many of them are running around somewhere nearby, how many died, how many are in captivity. The number of deaths is definitely in the thousands. Maybe 10 thousand, maybe 5, or maybe only 2. Even at the headquarters they don’t know for sure. But it should be closer to 10. And now we don’t count the LDNR corps - they have their own accounting.

16. Now, even if Zelensky is killed, taken prisoner, nothing will change. There is Chechnya in terms of hatred towards us. And now even those who were loyal to us are against it. Because it was planned from above, because we were told that there would be no such option, unless we were attacked. Because they explained that it was necessary to create the most credible threat in order to peacefully agree on the right conditions. Because we were initially preparing protests within Ukraine against Zelensky. Excluding our direct entry. Intrusions, to put it simply.

17. Further civilian losses will go exponentially - and resistance to us will also only increase. They already tried to enter the cities with infantry - out of twenty landing groups, only one had a conditional success. Remember the assault on Mosul - after all, this is the rule, so it was in all countries, nothing new.

18. Keep under siege? According to the experience of military conflicts in the same Europe in recent decades (Serbia is the largest testing ground here), cities can be under siege for years, and even function. Humanitarian convoys from Europe there are a matter of time.

19. We have a conditional deadline of June. Conditional - because in June we have no economy left, nothing remains. By and large, next week there will be a turning point in one of the sides, simply because the situation cannot be in such an overstrain. There are no analytics - it is impossible to calculate the chaos, here no one can say anything for sure. Act intuitively, and even on emotions - but this is not poker for you. Rates will rise, in the hope that suddenly some option will shoot through. The trouble is that we, too, can now miscalculate and lose everything in one move.

20. By and large, the country has no way out. It’s just that there is no option for a possible victory, and defeat is everything, sailed at all. They 100% repeated the beginning of the last century, when they decided to kick weak Japan and get a quick victory, then it turned out that the army was in trouble. then they started the war to the bitter end, then they began to take the Bolsheviks for "re-education" into the army - after all, they were outcasts, uninteresting to anyone in the masses. And then, the Bolsheviks, who were not really known to anyone, picked up anti-war slogans and it started like this ...

21.  

22. From the pros: we did everything so that even a hint of the mass sending of "penalty boxes" to the front line did not pass. Send convicts and "socially unreliable" political prisoners there (so that they don't mess with the water inside the country) - the morale of the army will simply go into the negative. And the enemy is motivated, terribly motivated. He knows how to fight, there are enough middle-level commanders there. There are weapons. They have support. We will simply set a precedent for human loss in the world. And that's it.

23. What we are most afraid of: at the top, they act according to the rule of overlapping the old problem with a new problem. Largely for this reason, the Donbass of 2014 began - it was necessary to divert the attention of Westerners from the topic of the Russian spring in Crimea, so the Donbass crisis, it seems, should have drawn all the attention to itself and become the subject of bargaining. But there were even bigger problems. Then they decided to push Erdogan into 4 pipes of the South Stream and entered Syria - this is after Soleimani gave deliberately false inputs in order to solve his problems. As a result, it was not possible to close the issue with Crimea, there are also problems with the Donbass, the South Stream has shrunk to 2 pipes, and Syria has hung with another headache (if we go out, they will demolish Assad, which will make us look like idiots, but it’s also difficult and useless to sit).

24. I don't know who came up with the "Ukrainian Blitzkrieg". If we were given real introductory information, we would at least indicate that the original plan is controversial, that we need to double-check a lot. A lot of things. Now we got into the shit somewhere up to the neck. And it is not clear what to do. "Denazification" and "demilitarization" are not analytical categories, because they do not have clearly defined parameters by which one can determine the level of accomplishment or non-completion of the task.

25. Now it remains to be seen that some fucking adviser will convince the top to start a conflict with Europe demanding to reduce some sanctions. Or reduce, or war. What if they refuse? Now I do not rule out that then we will be drawn into a real international conflict, like Hitler in 1939. And then our Z will be compared to us with a swastika.

26. Is there a possibility of a local nuclear strike? Yes. Not for military purposes (it will not give anything - this is a defense breakthrough weapon), but with the aim of intimidating others. At the same time, the soil is being prepared to turn everything to Ukraine - Naryshkin and his SVR are now digging the earth to prove that they secretly created nuclear weapons there. Damn, they are now hammering on what we have long studied and dismantled: you can’t draw evidence here on your knee, and the presence of specialists and uranium (Ukraine has a lot of depleted isotope 238) is nothing. There the production cycle is such that you can’t do it imperceptibly. You can’t even make a “dirty” bomb imperceptibly, but the fact that their old nuclear power plants can produce weapons-grade plutonium (plants like REB-1000 produce it in minimal quantities as a “by-product” of the reaction) - so the Americans introduced such control there with the involvement of the IAEA, that sucking on the topic is stupid.

27. Do you know what will happen next week? Well, even after two. Now it will cover us so much that we will start to miss the hungry 90s. While the auction was closed, Nabiullina seemed to be taking normal steps - but this is all like plugging a hole in a dam with a finger. It will still break through, and even stronger. Nothing will be decided in 3, 5, or 10 days.

28. Kadyrov beats his hoof for a reason - they have their own adventures there. He created for himself the image of the most influential and invincible. And if it falls once, it will be taken down by its own people. He will no longer be the owner of the winning teip.

29. We go further. Syria. "The guys will hold out, everything will be over in Ukraine - and there in Syria we will again strengthen everything in positions." And now, at any moment, they can wait there for the contingent to run out of resources - and such a heat will set in ... Turkey blocks the straits - to transport supplies there by planes, it's like heating an oven with money.

30. Notice that all this is happening at the same time, we don’t even have time to bring everything into one heap. We have a situation, like in Germany in the 43-44th. At the start right away. Sometimes I am already lost from this overwork, sometimes it seems that everything was a dream and it was a dream, that everything is as before.

31.  

32. In prisons, by the way, it will be worse. Now the nuts will begin to tighten so that to the bloody ichor. Everywhere. To be honest, purely technically, this remains the only chance to keep the situation - we are already in the mode of total mobilization. But you can’t stay in such a regime for a long time, and we have ambiguity with the timing and it will only get worse for now. From mobilization, management always goes astray. Yes, and imagine: you can run a hundred meters in a snatch, but it’s bad to go to a marathon distance and give a jerk with all your might. Here we rushed with the Ukrainian question, as if we were running a hundred meters, and fit into a cross-country marathon.

33. And that's what I'm talking about very, very briefly.

34. From the cynical, I will only add that I do not believe that VV Putin will press the red button to destroy the whole world.

35. Firstly, there is more than one person making a decision, at least someone will jump off. And there are a lot of people there - there is no "one-man red button".

36. Secondly, there are some doubts that everything is functioning successfully there. Experience shows that the greater the transparency and control, the easier it is to identify shortcomings. And where it is not clear who controls and how, but always bravura reports - everything is always wrong there. I'm not sure if the red button system works as advertised. In addition, the plutonium charge must be changed every 10 years.

37. Thirdly, and this is the most vile and sad thing, I personally do not believe in the readiness to sacrifice oneself of a person who does not let the members of the Federation Council, but his closest representatives and ministers, come close to him. For fear of the coronavirus or an attack, it doesn't matter. If you are afraid to let the most trusted people near you, then how will you dare to destroy yourself and your loved ones, inclusive?

38. If anything - ask, but I can not answer for several days. We are in rush mode, and there are more and more tasks.

39. In general, our reports are peppy, but everything flies in the pi_du.

40. Never before has this Gulagu.net source swearing, writing short and to the point. But even now he...

 

 

【文書の出所：https://pastebin.com/2agMRGmd、ロシア語から英語の翻訳：ジャーナリストChristo Grozev氏】