自治体をトリアージ

※トリアージ：フランス語の「triage」から由来しており、「選別」と言う意味を持っています。災害時の医療の優先順位を指すことで言葉が広まった。

限界集落を吟味し「トリアージ」する。生かす地域（自治体）にはコンパクトシティ化を促す政策誘導を提言。

地殻変動を伴う地震は今までと違う、しかも限界集落が多い。そういう場合、「元のまま」ではなく、それを機に「コンパクトシティ化」をすすめるべきでは？という議論が起こっている。
そこで。
そもそも少子高齢化、人口減の中でコミュニティを保つため（決して壊すためではない）、いわゆる「ポツンと一軒家」的な発想はNGで、
機能や住む場所を町の中心部に集約して、高齢者も単身者も移住者もそこで暮らせば高齢者も免許返上で暮らせる、移住者もどこに住めば良いのか分かる・・・町が行政がタウン化した建物を整備することで、民間不動産の変な中抜きや要らないサービスを省き適正料金で（例えば５万円フラット）住める。福祉的要素が強い場合は補助金を用意。・・この金額が分かりやすいが実はポイントで、動機付けにもなる。少数への莫大な税金（多数から取る）をかけてのインフラ整備も必要がなくなる→この予算を別の分野（子育て支援や高齢者福祉等）に回せる。（高齢者の終の棲家としてのセーフティネットとして、また新婚家庭への割安な住居提供も兼ねる・・・高齢化対策と少子化対策も視野に入れる）

限界集落は、何もしなければ消えゆくのみなので特段の解決策がないのであれば、消えてもらう。（継ぎ接ぎしてインフラ整備をする、莫大な税金を使うなら他の施策へ有効活用したい）
それをスピード感を持って推進し、まちづくりをデザインし他の自治体と差をつけるには「コンパクトシティ」の本気度が問われる。

小さな自治体は国や県の補助が無いと予算も少ないので、国がリードすることで「残すまち」「消えるまち」を【トリアージ】して、掛かるべき予算を集中し無駄を省き実行可能にする。そのためにどこかに先行事例、モデル都市（田舎だけど）を実証実験でもやるべきだ。（トヨタのウーブン・シティ(Woven City）のように）
トリアージされる限界集落に掛かるべきであろう費用を、新しくコンパクトシティ化する自治体・行政に振り分ける。（無駄金は発生させない）
・・・もっとも民間がその不便な限界集落を再開発したいというなら民間の予算で開発してもらえば良い。（国内企業に限る、投資ファンドに海外資本が入っていても所有権が無ければ認可）

ただ、ファーストペンギンが現れないと日本の行政、政治風土的は厳しいかもしれない。

都会

Triage municipalities
*Triage: Derived from the French word "triage", meaning "selection". The word spread to refer to medical priorities during disasters.

Examine marginal villages and "triage" them. Recommend policy guidance to encourage compact city development in regions (local governments) that will make the most of it.

Earthquakes that cause crustal deformation are unlike anything we've seen before, and there are many marginal settlements. In such cases, shouldn't we take advantage of this opportunity to promote ``compact cityization'' instead of ``keeping things as they were?'' There is a debate going on. Therefore. In the first place, in order to maintain the community in the face of a declining birthrate, aging population, and population decline (not to destroy it), the idea of so-called "detached houses" is no good. If people, single people, and immigrants can live there, elderly people can live there after giving up their driver's licenses, and immigrants can also know where to live... By establishing buildings that the government has turned into towns, the strange situation of private real estate can be avoided. You can live at a reasonable price (for example, 50,000 yen flat) by eliminating middle-income and unnecessary services. Subsidies are available if there is a strong welfare element. ...This amount is easy to understand, but it is actually a key point and can be a motivator. There will be no need for infrastructure development at the cost of huge taxes on the few (taken from the majority) → this budget can be diverted to other areas (childcare support, welfare for the elderly, etc.). (It will serve as a safety net for the elderly as their final home, and also provide inexpensive housing for newlywed families...We will also consider countermeasures against the aging population and declining birthrate.)

Marginal villages will simply disappear if nothing is done, so unless there is a particular solution, we will ask them to disappear. (If we are going to build infrastructure in a patchwork manner, and if we are going to spend a huge amount of tax money, we would like to use it effectively for other measures.) To promote this with a sense of speed, design town development, and differentiate ourselves from other local governments, we need to create a "compact city." 's seriousness is questioned.

Small local governments have small budgets without support from the national or prefectural governments, so by taking the lead, the national government can [triage] which cities will remain and which will disappear, concentrating the necessary budget, eliminating waste, and making it more viable. . To that end, we should conduct a demonstration experiment using a precedent case or a model city (although it is in the countryside). The costs that would otherwise be incurred for marginal villages being triaged (as in Toyota's Woven City) will be allocated to local governments/administrations that will newly transform them into compact cities. (We won't waste money)...If the private sector wants to redevelop an inconvenient marginal village, it would be fine to have it developed using private budget. (Approved only for domestic companies, even if the investment fund has foreign capital, if there is no ownership)

However, if the First Penguin does not appear, Japan's administrative and political culture may be difficult.