240527 反・単純化

実は
セッティングの話が大嫌い

何故なら
変数が多過ぎるから

こう聴いて
あぁ分かります
とか
あーなるほど
と言ってくれる位

理解度と解像度が高ければ
問題は起きないのですが

食い下がる人とか粘る人
居るじゃないですか

もしかしたら
そういう人達との会話が
嫌いなのかも

セッティングの話自体は
そんなに嫌いじゃないけど
食い下がられたり
粘られるのが嫌いなのかも

例えばハイパス

テレ使いで50'sだと不可避に近い話題で
チャキチャキを設計に組み込む前だから
パーツ選びが重要なのは分かります
が
ココにも変数が沢山転がって居る訳です

ボリュームを
どの様に使いたいのか
キルスイッチ的？
ゲインコントロール的？
グリッター抑制に？

用途が変われば
用意も変わるし
用具が変われば
用法も変わる訳です

コンデンサーは何を？
コレはテックさんの領域なので
正直に言っちゃうと
ワカンナイ
が適切な答えなんだけど

コレでは訊き手は満足シない
だから交換時に
それと無く伺っておく訳です

240527 Anti-Simplify

Actually.
I hate talking about setting up.

Because
There are too many variables.

Listen to this.
Oh, I get it.
and
"Oh, I see.

If the level of understanding and resolution is high enough
I don't have a problem.

But there are people who are reluctant or persistent, right?

Maybe...
Maybe you don't like to talk with people like that.

I don't mind talking about the setting itself.
but maybe I don't like being talked down to or persisted with.

High pass, for example.

It's a near-inevitable topic when you're a tele user and you're 50's.
It's before they were incorporated into the '70 design.
I understand the importance of parts selection.
but
There are a lot of variables lying here, too.

How you want to use the volume
How do you want to use it?
Is it a kill switch?
Gain control?
To suppress glitters?

If the application changes
the preparation will also change.
If the tools change
And as the tools change, so do the methods.

What about condensers?
This is the domain of the techs.
I honestly don't know.
is the proper answer.

But this doesn't satisfy the questioner.
That's why, at the time of exchange
I'm going to ask him without hesitation.

by DeepL