■■Professor Tatsuru Uchida and “New Nazism”■■
Gang stalking is sometimes referred to as a "solo holocaust," which is a tense expression. Until I experienced it myself, I had only heard the name, but to be honest, I didn't believe it 60% of the time.
It was about two years ago that an NPO expert pointed out that I was a "group stalker." After receiving your comments, I started taking action, thinking, ``I have to do something,'' but now that I think about it, I think I tended to rest and take it easy. Even if you understood it in your head, you may have felt like you weren't taking it seriously. The company's characteristics were described as ``rapidly expanding'' and ``continuing to the end.'' What is "the last"? I was told that I couldn't move, that I had to shut myself up in my room, and that there was no stopping me. Describing and publishing facts is a stressful act considering the halation that will ensue. It has become a well-known difficulty that it inflicts a great deal of damage on the people who write. The serious nature of this is a part of the act of public knowledge of facts, so please forgive me for taking it to a certain degree of seriousness.
I am at the bottom of the social ladder. My position here is to make everyone aware of the situation, and since the uproar did not just start yesterday or today, it has spread throughout society, so I would like to write about it in a light-hearted manner. Be careful not to lose respect.
Also, there is a big hurdle standing in the way of sharing consensus with everyone. I don't know the URL of the primary source. I am unable to check and respond to your responses. The information provided to the stalker and the world view and historical view developed through that information are unlikely to match mine. This is called COINTEL PRO. However, unfortunately, there are some facts involved, and I think this is causing mistrust. It's floating around on social media forever, and I think I have no choice but to carry it with me throughout my life. There is a first stage to the ongoing gang stalking, and the period is longer than the gang stalking. The gang stalking has been going on for nearly three years, and the disturbance itself has been going on for eight years now, including the first part. However, Itsuki Uchida has been the main conductor from its inception to the present. (Please refer to "ABOUT IT" for details on the beginning.
"ABOUT IT - re-published version -" https://note.com/xr448/n/n92c59ebc6c36
"ABOUT IT - re-published version -" (English version)
https://note.com/j_oot/n/n2225c0427c06)
Personally, I have felt that it is the most concise and comprehensive expression that is more consistent than any other consideration. This is a consideration from before gang stalking started.
Before the uproar started, I was a loyal reader of Uchida Sensei. There was a time when I read all the books written by Japan's leading experts one after another. Wasn't this your first film criticism book? I remember being unilaterally empathized with him. I think you can see in your insight that it is difficult to balance the subjectivity of the first person in the uproar while at the same time being the objectivity of a third party.
Now, I would like to introduce the changes.
(You may have criticized the preamble for being long and dense. I thought it would be easy to read since I linked it from today's greetings, but I will check it. Please wait a moment.
Thank you for providing the information. I am always indebted. )
(*I think most of the negative information posted is about myself, but what do you think? Thank you for your consideration.The issue of omissions, including honorifics in translation, is I wonder if there is...)
（Thank you very much for your cooperation. I am very grateful for your help every time.）
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
(*The message below is from ``Question - Reposted Version''. This is the text that was made known to everyone along with the English version a while ago. At that time, we will also confirm the ``innuendo'' message with everyone. )
(*In order to make it easier to understand, we would like to bold the parts of the text that are related to the commotion at the time of posting.However, there may be some criticism.If we judge that there are many opponents, I would like to amend it as per the above. Thank you for your consideration.)
■1 year and 4 months since the riot started
I'm away. Sensei's message to me is causing more and more controversy. On the other hand, there are also voices of criticism and restraint.
The event will reach its peak by calling for a message for me on TV based on the broadcast theme. The teacher will then be asked to explain the commotion.
In chronological order. Signed approximately 20 days before airing.
〇This is a teacher's post
【So far, I have finished two manuscripts. One is an abstract for the Pediatric Nursing Society. One is about the ``Tsukui Yamayurien Incident,'' which I contributed to ``Image,'' which is published by the theater company ``Kinhen.'' About how this bizarre political creature called the "patriotic libertarian" emerged. Ha, I'm tired. A little rest.】
↓
2 days later
〇This is a teacher's post.
【Retouched 4,500 characters of the GQ manuscript. Talk about conspiracy. Didn't you write about this in last month's issue? whatever. I need to write down what's wrong with conspiracy charges whenever I have the chance. What frightens me is the premise of the law's enactment that ``many people within the country are looking for an opportunity to collude in an attempt to destroy the country.'' 】
（This is a manuscript）【I know from experience that there are a certain number of people in this world who can be as despicable and violent as they want when they know that there is no fear of punishment or retaliation. They have no role in normal civil society, but the crime of conspiracy gives them the illusion that the government is expecting them to play an active role.】
（Continued）【Uematsu, the suspect responsible for the mass murder at Yamayuri Garden in Sagamihara, sent a letter to the Prime Minister and the Speaker of the House of Representatives before the incident, in the hope that he might receive permission to kill from them. That's why, even after the incident, he kept saying things like, ``He won't be given the death penalty because he's protected by those in power.''】
（Continued）【Of course, this is nothing more than a delusion, but what fueled the delusion was hate speech, abuse of welfare recipients, the argument that ``sickness is one's own responsibility,'' anti-Korean and anti-China books, and the Specified Secrets Protection Act. The premise of the crime of conspiracy is the recognition that ``the country is full of anti-Japanese forces.'' They really exist here and now.】
Words such as ``100 lies,'' ``impression manipulation,'' and ``child'' come up from people who know the context, starting from the top.
↓
Another day later
〇【Submitted manuscript to GQ. Regarding conspiracy charges. For the time being, this law will be operated in a ``one punishment, 100 commandments'' manner, arbitrarily selecting anti-government figures and punishing them arbitrarily, causing fear in the media, and mutual surveillance and mutual distrust among citizens. I think we aim to support the planting of Mutual monitoring and reporting by citizens is the cheapest way to monitor.】
（※“one punishment, 100 commandments”…Punishing one serves as a warning to all the others.）
↓
10 days later
〇【At the request of Mr. Kanamari from Gekidan Heihen, I contributed an article about the ``Sagamihara Incident'' to ``Image.'' Although the incident itself has already begun to be forgotten, the distortions in Japanese society that this incident exposed are becoming more severe day by day.】
(※This is one of the most typical texts addressed to me and is presented multiple times.)
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
『○○○The monster called libertarian』
（Excerpt of the part that seems to be a message specifically addressed to me）
The biggest shock of the Sagamihara mass murder was that Suspect Uematsu sent a letter in advance to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tamori Oshima, foretelling the crime.。
He hoped that his actions would be perceived as ``favorable'' by the government and the majority in the Diet, and that he would receive approval and protection from those in power. Even after his arrest, the suspect continued to make statements to the effect that ``I will not be sentenced to death because I am protected by those in power.''
Of course, this is just the suspect's imagination. However, this is not a delusion that has no basis in reality. This is because there are certainly realities within contemporary Japanese society that strengthen his delusional formation.
Immediately after the incident, announcer Yutaka Hasegawa posted on his blog in September 2016, ``Make all self-employed artificial dialysis patients pay the actual cost! If you cry that it's impossible, just kill them! The current system will destroy Japan. He posted an article titled "That's it!"
There are still certain social regulations in place against openly discriminatory remarks against seriously ill or disabled people, and in the case of celebrities, they receive some criticism and are subject to social sanctions. Discriminatory and offensive statements against socially vulnerable groups, such as Japanese and Koreans, welfare recipients, and LGBT people, are aired with almost no penalty.
One person who stands out is Rep. Satsuki Katayama, who has been complicit in spreading the unsubstantiated urban legend that welfare recipients live on a ``real annual income of 4 million yen,'' and has repeatedly made statements bashing welfare benefits. Recently, he has complained about NHK's news content based on fabricated posts, trying to raise public opinion that welfare recipients are social welfare "free riders." Of course, there is also the issue of whether the person himself ``believes'' that way, but there must also be a practical strategy at play in that if he publicly declares ``that kind of thing,'' he will gain votes in the election.
In the United States, President Donald Trump is the epitome of ``bashing the weak.'' Trump was supposed to have appeared on the scene carrying the wishes of the poor whites of the Rust Belt, but the policies he implemented after taking office were all about favorable treatment for the wealthy, including exclusion of immigrants and pressure on foreign companies to relocate to the country. 's ``employment measures'' are not bringing any benefits to the socially disadvantaged people who are here now.
I understand that the ``bashing of the weak'' that is happening in Japan today is a result of American-originated libertarianism drifting ashore in Japan and becoming decadent in an insidious way that is unique to Japan.
Don't count on sympathy or public support from others. We don't need a medical insurance system (medical care is a "service", so you should spend money to buy it. Those who don't have money will die). We don't need public schools (education is a "service", so you should spend money to buy it. Those who don't have money should either work to earn tuition fees or borrow money at interest). He says that there is no need for a social welfare system (those who can't live without the help of others should die), which is quite inhumane, but he says that it's just as if the bottom of the bucket has dropped.
However, in Japan, we cannot say that much (even if we think so in our hearts). You might blurt it out in a drunken state at a bar counter, but it's hard to say it in a public position.
In order to address this lack of thoroughness, Japanese libertarians adorn themselves with ``xenophobic'' ideology. They then try to make sense of the story by introducing the mysterious theory that the poor, the sick, the disabled, and welfare recipients are all essentially "foreigners." It is.
Suspect Uematsu repeatedly made self-defenses such as saying that he had done this ``for Japan'' and that ``society should have approved of it,'' and claimed that the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister had given them ``government permission'' to ``dispose of those who harm the national interest.'' There was a logical necessity in applying to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. He intuited that he was a political freak called a ``XXXX libertarian,'' and that many of the current Japanese political leaders were, to varying degrees, ``like him.''
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
↑
Criticisms such as ``lies'' and ``bullying'' continued against the teacher.
Even the next day.
Regarding conspiracy charges, the article ``You can see the omnipotence of those in power.''
``The powerful feel a sense of omnipotence when no one criticizes them for doing irrational and inappropriate things. By imposing drudgery on his subjects, he sought to confirm his omnipotence."
（※P.S. This is a message repeated by Mr. Uchida)
and,
〇 【Morning practice. The conspiracy charge was passed. This law gave the government a law that allowed them to detain as many people as they liked. We are rapidly approaching Singapore, which many of the congressmen who support conspiracy charges envision as a "utopia." 】
↑
Some people criticized it as ``corporal punishment'' and ``assault.''
〇3 days after the above. Appeared on TV.
【The replies that came to my Twitter the morning after I was found guilty of collusion were amazing.】
【"Get out of Japan"】
【”A society where citizens monitor citizens has arrived.”】
【Really, the channel opened by conspiracy charges is that the government encourages citizens to snitch on other citizens, to blackmail them, to abuse them, and to view their neighbors as enemies.
[Actually, this is only a small part of what happens in a surveillance society.】
【The scariest thing is tipping off by citizens.】
【Even in the case of the Gestapo (Nazi secret police), it was almost always neighbor informing neighbor.】
【What they are doing is consistently trying to instill in the public the impression that parliamentary deliberations are meaningless. I'm complaining with all my body that we don't need a legislature,】
【No matter how much opposition parties oppose this time, the laws decided by the Cabinet will definitely pass.】
】
【Indeed, ``dictatorship'' refers to the same form in which the law enforcement agency and the enacting agency are the same.】
↑
While messages sent through television have received a lot of support, they have also received criticism such as ``appropriation of power,'' ``personal attacks,'' and ``malice and hatred.''
(*Additional note: The series of messages were also continuously sent by Mr. Uchida)
●Reaction after uploading the above text.
It's been about 1 year and 10 months since now, but I'd like to write down my reaction at the time. With the help of others, I was later able to confirm the facts of the communication that required an explanation from the flow of this article's appearance on TV. However, after 3 days, negative messages start appearing here and there.
〇After checking the facts, the teacher will sign the letter.
〇My reply to
【I guess the message was that "I didn't get him to admit it because of your power." I didn't feel like I "made him admit it," but what he really meant was that he was relieved.It's a pathetic story, but what happened was that the negotiations went well. I am now aware that I can only say that none of this was my own strength, and at this time as well, other people encouraged me to answer this question.】
↓
〇3 days later, the teacher...
【There is a movie called Denial that depicts the holocaust falsehoods. This film adaptation of a true story takes advantage of the fact that historical revisionism takes advantage of the fact that any delusional theory appears to have some academic basis as long as it is brought into debate as to whether it is right or wrong. Historical revisionism says, ``If you bring both arguments together, you win.''】
（Continued）【The Japanese title of Denial is "Negation and Affirmation". By suddenly introducing both theories, we have given the historical revisionists the upper hand. Did the distributor come up with the title without seeing the movie, or was there malicious intent? However, this roundabout support for delusional theories by ``listening both theories'' seems to be a common practice in the Japanese media these days.】
From this point on, the words ``hoax'' and ``lie'' begin to appear frequently in the teacher's messages.
〇Mr. Uchida
【Hmm. The truth is becoming more and more obscure. But it's been a while since I saw his name, Dario Argento.】
for,
〇my message
【For Mr. Sato, if there is a misunderstanding of the facts or a difference of opinion, I would like you to point it out concretely, instead of calling it an abstract "lie" or "hoax." I mentioned my weaknesses above, but I never imagined that I couldn't make a single mistake. Please feel free to point it out. 】
This question and the teacher's message form a parallel line.
■The following is material from my article "◆The Relationship between Dr. Uchida and the Riots, and Recent Messages ◆".
● Privatization of power
This theme has been criticized by many people even before gang stalking began, and the response of the critic's message and Dr. Uchida's message to the critic has been dealt with in other records.
0Uchida, this is a repost of Dr. Uchida's.
[As long as the LDP is in power, this "privatization of power" will be repeated without remorse, and government offices will be forced to cover up, falsify, and make excuses for it. The nation is breaking down. The country and its people are now being questioned. ]
〇Uchida, Dr. Repost.
The blatant "pressure and discovery" to show the movie "The Specter's Grandchildren". A chill ran down my spine. This is happening in what Prime Minister Kishida and other LDP leaders call "free and democratic" Japanese society. This is not something that can be dismissed with a "well, it happens. Those who threaten freedom and democracy are stirring in the background.
(*"The Specter's Grandson" is a documentary film about the former head of Abe, who is used as a sign for Dr. Uchida.)
〇
This is a repost of Dr. Uchida's.
["Both Prime Minister Kishida and the LDP are holding their bellies and laughing like gibberish. They are laughing in their bellies. Even if they do whatever they want with their power, even if they make a fortune from the Olympics, even if they collude with the Unification Church, even if they cover up and falsify information and send good government employees to their deaths, everyone will cleanly forget about it and support them. "]
[>"That is why Japan is so broken. Is this really the way to go? "]
[(* Who is "PM Kishida" referring to?
〇This is a repost from Dr. Uchida
["Abenomics is not a failure. If it had failed and the economy was getting worse, we would have lost the election and lost power a long time ago. Abenomics was a success."]
↑
This is Dr. Uchida's message.
[This is typical powsercracy narrative. "The fact that we are in power now is because all our policies are correct and therefore we have the will of the people. All criticism of us is dismissed on the basis of the fact that we are in power.
This is a serious disease that is afflicting contemporary Japanese society.
(*[Abenomics] is the general term for the economic policies taken during the Abe administration. Abe" is a typical signifier for Dr. Uchida.)
〇This is a message from Dr. Uchida.
[The current Japanese media, in the name of "freedom of speech," uncritically overlooks the fact that "people in power" and "loud voices" dominate the field of speech. In the name of common sense, don't you think that it is part of the media's job to correct language that is offensive to public decency, saying "Enough is enough"? ]
(continued) [I think what is critically lacking in Japanese medicine today is "common sense". The judgment that "it is insane" is not a realistic deterrent. A society in which "insane behavior" cannot be deterred unless it is based on law or unless it is suppressed by force is a "barbaric society. ]
〇Repost of your criticism of Dr. Uchida
"It's sad, but I guess the old "the more you bully, the more the adults will do as they are told" method is effective in this country. "
↑
This is Dr. Uchida's message to you.
[This is really true. No matter how unreasonable a politician is, the public will infer that "he must be doing so because he is so powerful that he cannot be punished for being unreasonable. So the rule of thumb that "the most effective way to get into a position of authority is to try to be overbearing" holds true. ]
● Fascist system
〇This is a repost of Dr. Uchida's repost.
(The repost here is a criticism of fascism raised against Dr. Uchida, a series of them.)
[German government agencies
"Today, July 20, 1944, is the date of Hitler's assassination attempt. Some military officers attempted a coup against Nazi rule. The result was a failure, and many people allegedly involved in the incident were executed (image). And among them were 13 officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs."]
(*Who is "Hitler" referring to? Who are "some officers of the army" referring to?)
(continued)
[>"Within the German Foreign Ministry, there is a wall that bears the names of and commemorates the Foreign Ministry employees who were executed for opposing the Nazi rule in this incident and other ways, as well as those who have died in the line of duty. They are an example of courage and responsibility, and to guide them in their duties to this day and in the future, the wall is purposely located in a conspicuous place in the building where it can be seen by the staff. ]
(*[Wall that has been opposed and executed] [Wall that has been marked with names and memorialized])
〇My notes.
[(In chronological order. The criteria for masking account names and icons are divided according to whether or not you are aware of the existence of the disturbance. Approximate judgment here)]
[Retweeted by Dr. Uchida
(The Diet is in dispute over whether the administration put pressure on news programs. On that subject)
>I vividly remember the time when the ghost of fascism came out. It was a tirade that twisted the Broadcasting Act, but if there was one, it was a fabrication by his subordinates, and he put the blame on the weak. How despicable! ]
> (* This is a matter that is now often linked and mentioned in my rant.)
〇This is a repost of Dr. Uchida's.
Message in quoted repost
"One of the main reasons why Nisei legislators have expanded so much in our country is probably the low politic morality of those who hold up delegates as "our beneficiary agents". Such industry people have not discovered a shred of value in "the ideal principle of democracy" from the beginning, and second-generation legislators are easier to govern."
↑
Repost's message
[Luchino Visconti's "The Brave Men of Hell" depicted the process by which a German family of corporate executives supported the Nazis for their own benefit. That is how they ended up destroying the country.】
■Excerpts from recent texts
Interview with Japan Monthly, "Ukraine and Palestine”
[Prime Minister Netanyahu called Hamas "the new Nazis," and in his speech he expressed a dualistic understanding of good and evil: "We are the people of light and they are the people of darkness. Israel's Minister of Defense even went so far as to say "We are fighting beasts in human form (human animals). According to Israel, this battle with Hamas is not a "normal war" between two nations to protect their respective national interests, but a "mythical war" in which humans are fighting the devil. Then it is no wonder that Israel's attack on Gaza is unstoppable. Because the other side is not human. ] (*corrected typo)
（※'What is going on in the riot'...Dr. Uchida's instructions to the stalker, incitement.）
（※We are fighting against human animals." [Mythical war in which humans are fighting demons, not a "normal war"] [No wonder then that Israel's attack on Gaza is unstoppable. The other side is not a human being."] ("Nazis," "good/evil dualism," "beasts," and "normal" ...... are all quoted words and symbols that have been used in this uproar.)
【The top priority is a ceasefire as soon as possible to protect the lives of the people of Gaza who are still being killed at this very moment. "This is not a matter of words, it is a matter of time," is what Dr. Liu of The Plague tells the experts who are forever debating whether the disease is a plague in the face of the spread of infection. I think the same can be said about Gaza today.】
（※"Take time away from minorities," "time is death," and "prolong it," are frequent messages from Dr. Uchida. The "plague" is another symbol that has been used in the uproar.）
【Russia also appears to be regressing to a premodern paradigm. Putin invaded Ukraine on a platform of "de-Nazification".】
（※[regresses to a pre-modern paradigm]...One of the criticisms of Dr. Uchida's uproar, and one of the contents of his command. It is frequently mentioned.）
【The problem is not so much the rationality of the peace agreement itself, but rather public sentiment. It is the "negative emotions" such as anger, hatred, and humiliation that drive people most strongly.】
（※It is both an explanation of populism and Nazi propaganda, but it is also one of the critiques of Dr. Uchida's uproar, and one of command. It is one that is frequently）
【"The Fukuda Village Incident" was such a film. We "make offerings" through stories about the dead. That is, we do not just label the dead as "good guys" or "bad guys," but we tell stories about the "depth" of human beings that cannot be summed up in a single word.】
（※The "Fukuda Village Incident"...also known as the "Korean Massacre". It is a historical hate crime caused by a hoax such as "Koreans sprinkled poison in a well". This is the message that was sent out twice when you responded that "you are being attacked by psychic powers from me" was a "hoax.
Who are [the dead]? [It labels the dead as "good" and "evil"]. As a reference, the above-mentioned [dualism of good and evil]. It will be easier to read if you recall the doublespeak of "war is peace" and "obedience is freedom.）
【Currently, Japan-Korea relations are improving, and I believe that this is due to the accumulation of such cultural efforts behind it. No matter how long it may take, we must calm negative national feelings through the repose of the dead and consolation of the living, and break the "curse" of the cycle of hatred between the nations.】
（※This one is the opposite of what is mentioned above. The "curse" of the cycle of hatred must be broken. Obedience is freedom. I hope this reminds you of Doublespeak.）
【Now Israel refuses to coexist with Palestine, but the modern state of Israel was created in the first place because of Europe's refusal to coexist with the Jews, which was a distant cause. The root of the problem is human intolerance, the inability to "coexist with others". This gave rise to modern anti-Semitism, which gave rise to the Palestinian problem, which gave rise to the current massacre in Gaza, and is even giving rise to a new anti-Semitism.】
（※ Doublespeak. It is written that the opposite is reversed. [The root of the problem is human intolerance, the inability to "live in harmony with others." This gave rise to modern anti-Semitism, which gave rise to the Palestinian problem, which gave rise to the current massacre in Gaza, and which is even giving rise to a new anti-Semitism]. See above [New Nazis].）
[The answer is easier said than done. Anti-Semitism and the Palestinian issue are the same root problem. It is the "heart that refuses to live with others" that has created both of these. As long as people succumb to such weak sentiments, the same kinds of problems will reproduce endlessly. There is no other solution than "to become a person who can live in harmony with others who have no understanding or empathy. ]
（※ Doublespeak. It is written that the opposite is reversed. [Both of these were created by "a mind that refuses to live in harmony with others. As long as people succumb to such weak sentiments, the same kinds of problems will be reproduced endlessly. There is no other solution than to "become a person who can live in harmony with others, even those who have lost all understanding and empathy."）
That is all.
(Dr. Uchida, could you please stop?)
The latter text may have been a little difficult to understand.
(Dr. Uchida, could you please stop?)
As for the latter text, it may have been a little difficult to understand. Therefore, I would like to add a (note) to make it easier for me to convey the message. For those who have known the disturbance in Japan for a long time and have read Dr. Uchida's messages, this one is not so difficult and has a solid intersubjectivity. All of the messages are frequent directives to Dr. Uchida's disturbance. Also, I have read through and briefly by-lined the areas of interest, but I would like to draw them out again in new detail.
I hope this has helped your understanding. I hope that you will forgive me for being so rude as to explain the "insinuation" to Dr. Uchida, even though he has been subjected to "harassment" (according to Dr. Uchida) for many years and even though he is in a position to make you aware of the incident.
I have a question for Dr. Uchida. I think this is probably the most confusing part of the text for foreign readers, so I would like to know your answer.
【Postscript】
It saddens me that I cannot be flexible in responding to your responses, but please allow me to repost Dr. Uchida's reaction to our interpretation of the text here on the day we first asked the "New Nazis" question. This one was also confirmed by another person to be valid in the context of the uproar.
〇Message from Dr. Uchida.
【Children's ears are truly amazing.】【It's a faithful reproduction of the pronunciation.】
↓
("Ukraine and Palestine" -> message of confirmation -> subsequent message.)
(I'm adding this person's name as it came up earlier)
〇This is a message from Dr. Uchida
I also introduced it in real time.
[I am going to write about the Camusartre controversy, but I inadvertently started thinking about "Why didn't Heidegger have a heart-to-heart with Nazi Germany?" and I haven't gotten to the controversy yet this month.］
（※［Heidegger] ...a philosopher who was complicit with the Nazis. Famous for escaping punishment after WWII.）
■Excerpted from "Dr. Uchida's Relationship with the Disturbance, and His Recent Message."
●(continued) 【The game is over when you choose to "protect the organization" by drinking that proposal. It is the very organization that loses because it has let go of its moral integrity from itself in its inability to "protect its fellow man." The individuals that "One Punishment, One Hundred Commandments" attacks are the "leverage" to bring the organization down to rubble.】
●【■■■We had a 3 hour discussion with Mr. It was interesting! There were many "between you and me" stories that surprised me and made me laugh out loud. But, unfortunately, this can't be put into print, can it? My hypothesis of "people are rushing to death to get out ahead of death" intertwined with Mr. ■■'s diagnosis that Japan is "already a living corpse".】
（※(I would appreciate it if you could read the patterns rather than the meanings of the individual messages.)
Many people would agree that Dr. Uchida is one of Japan's leading intellectuals and establishers, holding important positions such as university chancellor and many other organizations, and his writings have been adopted for use in textbooks. Of course, I am one of them. As my privileged position indicates, I have left comments and texts that are conducive to the good of Japan. Why would someone in such a position give guidance that would lead the world and Japan in a direction that is ostensibly the opposite of what it is supposed to be (the "dissolution," "death," "new Nazis," "intolerance," "regression," "cycle of hate" mentioned above, and, as you confirmed in your response to me, the "Korean genocide" orientation)?
Thank you for your time and I would appreciate any clarification you could provide.
●Re-reading "Fascism of Love and Illusion”
【But most of all, I was surprised because the ideology of the main character, Fuyuni Suzuhara, who is called a "fascist" by the media and who takes the fight to America, is the very "accelerationism" of today.
Accelerationism is a post-capitalist ideology that emerged in the United States and has become the dominant ideology among young businessmen in Silicon Valley, I hear.
Capitalism has reached its limits. But with the interference of those who advocate human rights, political correctness, and environmental protection, capitalism has become somewhat "bearable," and because of this, it is rather prolonged. Instead, it is better to end capitalism at once. To do so, the social welfare and insurance systems should be abolished, and both medical care and education should be commodified so that those without money cannot receive them. In this way, it is a ruthless and hard idea to weed out the weak individuals and build a new post-capitalist world with only those strong people who can survive.
Fuyuji Suzuhara speaks of this idea as it is.
"The only important thing is that human beings have become too far removed from animals. Man is just an animal. (...) I will turn man back into an animal." "The delusion that we must be happy is tormenting the slaves," Suzuhara muses, so "we should thoroughly destroy Japan once and for all."
Modern Japanese will no longer feel much discomfort with this novel's development, as a large number of the Japanese public applauds this destructive ideologue and begs for his rule. A significant number of Japanese already applaud politicians who scoff at "human rights and political correctness" and tell them that weak individuals should just die in the streets. Either they believe themselves to be "strong enough to survive," or they are so desperate that they are willing to "die for them.】
That is all for your introduction.
I believe that the above theme, "Retreat to the Premodern Paradigm," has been summarized as central in the very first question I asked you.
●Complex Systems and the Joy of Destruction."
【(There is a strict boundary between the world of politics and business and social common capital that must not be overcome. At some point, the Japanese have abandoned that common sense. Perhaps seeing a long-standing robust system radically changed with only a few inputs (even when you are the victim of it) may give you a kind of omnipotence. I was taught by my Aikido master, Hiroshi Tada Sensei, that destruction can be done with 1/100th of the power it takes to create. Therefore, those who seek omnipotence quickly will always be destructive. So continued the teacher's teaching.
There are too many people in the world today who are whored by the sense of omnipotence gained by destruction. At the beginning of this year, I would like to reiterate my teacher's teachings. 】
（※ Frequent theme. See, for example, the above [regarding conspiracy, "The omnipotence of those in power can be seen"].）
●The Ukraine Crisis and "Defiance"
(*The picture "[Ukraine] = me, [Russia] = teacher" was often used in the invasion of Ukraine.
Since the beginning of the Russian military invasion of Ukraine, I have been asked by various media outlets for my opinion.
This time, however, the situation is completely different. Everyone senses that something different is happening.
Albert Camus wrote at the beginning of his lengthy philosophical book, "The Rebellious Man," that even when events are similar, people sometimes act in ways they have never done before when they intuit that something is different at a certain time. A slave who has always obeyed his master's commands with obedience may one day suddenly say, "I can't follow this order. "I have been obeying in silence until now, but I can't follow this one," he says.
（※[Albert Camus] ["The Rebellious Man"] will be a word frequently used by the teacher. I wonder who...）
This could be read as saying something about the current relationship between Ukraine and Russia. But what Camus is writing here is that when people choose to rebel against acts of territorial aggression, they are not simply impelled by a feeling of "I can't take it anymore." One chooses rebellion when one feels that if one accepts this, one will lose more than one can repay on one's own. That was Camus' view.
When it comes to something that can be done only by one's own endurance of humiliation and acceptance of pain, one does not necessarily choose "rebellion.
It is not psychologically difficult to accept a violation of one's rights if one thinks, "If I alone suffer, that's all I have to do. I might do that. So, people choose "rebellion" even at the risk of death because they feel that if they accept the violation of their rights here, it is not their rights or freedom alone that will be lost.
Camus continues.
"A person accepts to die, and sometimes dies in defiance, because he believes that it is for the sake of a 'good thing' that is beyond his own personal destiny. A person would rather die than deny the right he is protecting because he places that right above himself. A person acts in the name of a value because he feels that he shares that value with all, even if only vaguely." (Ibid., p.425)
I agree. So the rebellious man is not alone. For through that battle of rebellion, he is potentially connected to all.
But if Camus were alive today, I think he would say that those who are fighting in Ukraine, or those who are shouting "anti-war" in Russia at the risk of imprisonment, are not necessarily doing so out of "patriotism". They are fighting for a higher value than that, he said.
Actions for patriotism and actions for higher values are outwardly very similar. Sometimes they are so similar that they are almost indistinguishable.
We are not usually particularly moved when we see people from other countries exuding patriotism. We are usually not particularly moved when we see people from other countries exuding patriotism: "Oh, I see. You love your country so much? I'm glad you like your country so much," or "That's silly.
As a result, the "Mere Old Man" was able to make a very good impression on the people of Japan.
That is why I do not understand the motivation of those who are now fighting "defiance" in Ukraine and Russia as "patriotism". I think they are fighting for "higher values" than that.
We cannot take our eyes off those who are fighting the fight of defiance because we feel that through their fight they are simultaneously defending the rights of those of us who are far away, faceless and nameless. Therefore, we should not isolate them.
Yes, it is irrational.
But what we lose when these rebels are defeated is not the level of wheat and corn imports or natural gas supplies. Something more essential will be lost. We probably know that intuitively.
(* It's a beautifully drawn out theory...and I think your logic is consistent and easy to understand.
(I may have been reproached earlier, perhaps by some of you overseas. My apologies. This sentence from yesterday was ringing in my head. Sometimes what I read comes out as an influence.)
(I have heard that there is a big gap between Japanese and foreign audiences. I have been stumbling and struggling to fill the gap, but I think that if I were to make an assertion through the news media of the other side, it might mean that Zelensky is advocating his point of view in the Russian press, following your aforementioned example.
To you all, I may be the object of hatred. On the other hand, I can say that the parties involved, i.e., the teacher and I, are in agreement in our view of the noise. I have felt a twisted sympathy and incredible discomfort with the insights spelled out noiselessly by the teacher. One of the most objective and comprehensive views, he said. But now the situation is that the rest of us are seeing it through a vision that could be described as the opposite. Perhaps that is what I mean when I say that my words are not being understood at all. The "ESP" problem may be similar. While the parties living in reality share the same understanding, either by mutual consent or protest, I think we can see the media as supplying a different kind of information. To borrow your example, within Russia and Ukraine, the "war of aggression" is viewed with the same historical perspective. But the rest of the world is united in the consensus that Ukraine is a Nazi state.
I sometimes wonder if one clue might be the question of when the feeling in your text existed in your mind. I imagine, though I cannot see it, that it probably corresponds to the sense of discomfort you all had when you first encountered this disturbance. It is my own experience on the Internet that human perceptions can be easily distorted. Putting my own inadequacies aside, it is not an easy story to think about how Zelensky can get you all to acknowledge his claims through Russian state broadcasting. There is another story that exists, and it is in this record, which is going on with the parties involved, not anyone else, writing about the parties and with the confirmation of third parties who knew what was going on at the time. We are doing this with the hope that you will know that.)
〇 For your reference
・From "ABOUT IT"
[Sexual harassment is really about "confirming your power by making the other person do something they don't want to do," so "This kind of behavior is painful to the opposite sex" is meaningless. Because it is painful for the receiver, it is enjoyable for the doer."]
・From "Complex Systems and the Joy of Destruction"
[I was taught by my aikido master Hiroshi Tada Sensei that "destruction can be done with one-hundredth of the power it takes to create. Therefore,those who seek omnipotence quickly must destroy. So continued the teacher's teaching.
There are too many people in the world today who are lewd with the sense of omnipotence gained by destruction.
・The New Nazism in this article, "Ukraine and Palestine.
・In "Fascism of Love and Illusion,"
[It is a ruthless and hard idea to weed out the weak individuals and build a new post-capitalist world with only those strong people who can survive.
[Fuyuji Suzuhara speaks of this idea as it is.
"The only important thing is that man has become too far removed from animals. Man is just an animal. (...) I will turn man back into an animal." Suzuhara muses, "The delusion that we must be happy is tormenting the slaves," so "we should just thoroughly destroy Japan once and for all."]
〇Since we were able to confirm your response after updating this text (we were also able to see that you shared the same meaning with a third party), we would like to post it as a record of the exchange that took place.
I [would like to record this in near real time]
↓
Dr. Uchida's message in his repost
[I didn't know he was a neo-Nazi and
I didn't know he was a Unification Church
Such security clearance for Mr. Koichi]
([Unification Church]...a cult-like new religious organization that has been called into question for its cozy relationship with the ruling party. Often used as a metaphor for this disturbance.
Who is [Mr. Takaichi]...
(Last but not least, we would like to ask for confirmation of today's work by someone who has known about the turmoil since the beginning and is familiar with Dr. Uchida's messages. We apologize for the trouble we have caused you every day, but we would appreciate your cooperation.)
I had this conversation at Kurayoshi's brackish water airport.
（※I would like to take this as another "reference to the disturbance," but rather as the meaning of the table of doublespeak. George Orwell created the language space of "1984" as something "scarier than a bomb" (I just checked the quote on the Internet), and I think that the representations, including words, also played a major role in this riot, as if they were the main characters.）
（Regarding the text here, we have read it as a supplement to the overarching theme of "poverty" but not as dense as the meaning of the doublespeak table. Depending on your response, we may consider deleting it.）
In order for the Common to exist, we must first secure a rich public good, a "public good that everyone can use". That is why we "take out" in the launching of a common. The public can only be launched when all members offer a portion of their private property and renounce a portion of their private rights. Therefore, if there are people who want to take more out of the public good than they have contributed, it is only natural, but if the majority of the members want to collect exactly what they have contributed, the common will not be established.
・『ABOUT IT』
（(hinted by Dr. Uchida) [Writing only about the phenomenon it caused, information was spread in the community that "there is a 'welfare' among my friends." Of course, I am not acquainted with him
I receive criticism from many people."]
From then on, the teacher will submit symbols indicating "welfare," "homeless," "unemployed," "poverty," and so on. The teacher will submit symbols that indicate "welfare," "homeless," "unemployed," "poverty," and so on. For those who do not share the context, it is a social welfare message."]
- This is Dr. Uchida's post mentioned earlier in this paper.
[Since the 2010s, "organizational management" has been defined as "creating a top-down organization," "heavily employing those who agree with the agenda of the top management and eliminating those who object," and "finding and punishing those who are not working for their salary and free-riders in the system."]）
"This is mine. Nobody touch it." The very mindset of refusing to share pushed up GDP and became the thrust of rapid growth. The "privatization of everything," the pursuit of "selfhood" without sharing anything or coming to terms with anyone, was regarded as the "absolute good" in capitalism. The result is now.
It is almost 30 years since the bubble burst. Since then, Japan has been getting poorer and poorer, but the mindset of "not sharing one's wealth with anyone" has not changed. Common was a public good to enrich each and every person's life. But nowadays, everything is labeled by its owner, and there is no common available to everyone.
When I was a child, Japan was in "republican poverty. We were poor, but everyone shared many things. Everyone used what they needed and in turn took care of the children of other families. Japan is now poor again. Therefore, I think it is time to rebuild the system of depositing goods and services to the public and allowing those who need them to use them, as it was done back then.
（※ This has been a consistent theme sent to me by the teacher.
〇Refer to:
・From "◆Uchida Sensei's Relationship with the Riots, Recent Messages◆" and "● Poverty"
【When I asked the teacher who messaged me that he "killed your friend" why) [Like Hirakawa Sensei, for accuracy, here are some other messages from Uchida Sensei to me. Here is today's tweet.
＞Street business."】
・From a newspaper article
(Influencer creates a huge firestorm with his eugenics comment, leading to NPO groups and the Ministry of Health and Welfare announcing that the welfare system is a system guaranteed by the Constitution.
【He said, "If there is money to feed the welfare people, I think they should save the cats" and "I don't benefit if the welfare people live, but the cats benefit if they live. He also stated that lives he does not need are "light" and that he "doesn't care about the lives of homeless people," and "I'm sorry to say this, but wouldn't it be better if they weren't here?" He also said, "I'm sorry to say this, but wouldn't it be better if they didn't exist?" and "I'm sorry to say this, but it wouldn't be better if they didn't exist.】)
（Although this is a departure from the theme of "The New Nazism," I would like to introduce it in relation to the theme we discussed earlier, "Thought and Practice. I may later move it to another text.）
●About the Covid Special Measures Law
（※Although the disturbance itself started before the corona, there were people who pointed out the influence of the corona and its correlation during the overheating phase, and I think it was vaguely but commonly understood by everyone.）
（※ corona＝covid）
The LDP and DPJ have agreed to revise the proposed amendment to the Law Concerning Special Measures against the New Type of Coronavirus, and the controversial prison sentence for those infected who refuse to be hospitalized has been removed. Although I felt a little relieved, I was very uncomfortable and uneasy with the provision in the original proposal that those who refused hospitalization would be imprisoned for up to one year or fined up to 1,000,000 yen.
These are just a few examples of the dangerous nature of the current administration.
It is reasonable for governments and municipalities to demand that citizens limit their private rights in emergency situations. But only if the public authorities have done all they can do and there is nothing left to do but to ask citizens to behave in a public manner.
While many citizens may have been angered by the shifting of responsibility for the spread of infection to "lack of effort on the part of citizens,"an even bigger problem is the idea that infected people are "criminals" and hospitals are "prisons," which is submerged in this idea.
The reason for likening the infected to criminals is that the drafters of this amendment believe that health is the result of self-effort. Those who lack that effort are the ones who become ill. Therefore, the sick must take "responsibility for becoming ill. If one did not think so, even subconsciously, such a statement would not come to mind. And if illness is one's own responsibility, then it is only a short distance from there to the eugenic idea that "public assistance should not be provided for the sick".
（※I am on welfare protection. Incidentally, the theme that occurred as an offensive point of view about me in the initial stages, and which came under fire and was associated with the publication of the book (Dr. Uchida also participated in the interview), was the theme of depression.）
The ruling party members believe that the restraint on eating and drinking does not apply to them, and that they deserve priority treatment that ordinary citizens are not allowed because they are the "elite". They probably innocently believe that public resources should be distributed preferentially to "those with power." Therefore, they demand an "obligation" not to spread the infection before they recognize the "right" of the "powerless" (which includes corona patients) to seek public assistance.
This administration is indeed coherent in its political philosophy of "the strong take all and the weak do nothing.
（※Refer to
The connection between the Corona and the riots can be briefly explained as a defense mechanism of "displacement" in which people's threatening stress is amplified by the state of emergency and directed toward the weak who are less able to resist. This is what I think happened. I found a site that explains the psychology of the subcorona. I have often pointed out that this regulation is also at work in Israel, which attacks Palestine, across history.
・From my article "◆The Relationship between Dr. Uchida and the Riots, and Recent Messages, ◆”Attack Systems”
Here is the teacher's comment. 【I wrote a review of "Target" in "Friday Weekly". I limited my discussion to the practical question of how political violence is exercised.
Political violence is characterized by "the concentration of attacks on private individuals, separating them from the organizations to which they belong" and by "the arbitrary choice of targets" in order to achieve a "one-punishment, one-hundred-commandment" effect.】
（※One hundred commandments" is a motif often used by teachers when discussing this riot. One hundred commandments" means: ...... that by punishing one person for a transgression, you make it a commandment for many others.
To punish one person for a relatively minor offense, and to make it a commandment for many others by demonstrating an attitude of not overlooking even the slightest transgression.)
(Today's report was written partly because the original act itself is hard, but when I read it again, I think it tended to be too explanatory and lacked room to spare. I may have made you feel harsh. My apologies. I would like to end today with this. Thank you for your understanding and forgiveness.）
●Crisis of Crisis
There used to be a magazine called "Shincho 45. At some point, the magazine changed to a far-right tone, began to publish articles of poor quality, and eventually ceased publication. When it was still a decent magazine, they used to let me write long stuff.
"The crisis, you know, that started to take off in the 20th century," he told me, and I thought, "Oh!
However, at that time the theory of happiness stopped being the subject of philosophy, and instead the theory of crisis came to the foreground. At that time, we both thought this and that about the historical reasons why crisis theory became popular at that time.
When the value of money is stable over a long period of time, it becomes possible for a class to inhabit that could not exist in other times. It is a race of "high nomads. The conditions for their survival are in place.
This disappearance of the lantiers is the reality of the crisis of the 1910s.
In that sense, Lenin, Mussolini, Stalin, and Mao are all people of the "emerging class" in that they are politicians who came out on the strength of the 20th century "masses. They emerged by kicking the aristocrats of the old era in their "noblesse oblige" morality.
The aristocrats and lantiers of the old world are brought to their knees before a new social vision in which money and military power will now determine the dynamics of international politics.
The arts and sciences, politics, science, adventure, and pleasure, which had been monopolized by the aristocrats and lantiers of the old world, are being taken away from them one after another by a new class of people backed by real power. This sense of helpless subjugation and plunder is perhaps the raw physical reality that underlies the word "crisis. That is how I imagine it.
The traumatic experience of genocide brought about by modern science and technology, the loss of supranational solidarity among the aristocracy that had deterred all-out war between nation-states, the downfall of the class that had been responsible for intellectual innovation and the emergence of the greedy "masses"... When one looks over all these factors, it is clear that this is the case. When we look at all these factors, we can say that it was a situation that deserves to be called a "crisis" when it became a reality at once.
（※War is Peace" and "Bondage is Freedom"... if you keep in mind the doublespeak.）
Since then, the "crisis" situation that was prototyped at that time seems to me to have maintained the same structure for the past 100 years, albeit with various changes in design. If you will forgive me for putting it very roughly,I see the struggle of ideas over the past 100 years as a process in which the "ideology of making enemies," which aims to divide the world into simple logical and schematic dualisms of right and wrong, reason and nonreason, good and evil, and the "ideology of not making enemies," which accepts the coexistence of diverse values dedicated to the individual and the group, have been in a struggle against one another. The "thought of not making enemies" that embraces the symbiosis of diverse values dedicated to the individual and the group can be seen as a process of confrontation. I think that. The war situation is consistently dominated by "dualistic," confrontational thinking and the other-blaming, aggressive language it secretes, driving the "it's okay to be different" thinking of tolerance to the wall. The "no-enemies" philosophy is now on the edge of the ring, with its toes in the "moral ring" and its whole body bowed in a desperate attempt to hold on.
（※See also
"Ukraine and Palestine" in this article
[The "New Nazis"] [Dualistic understanding of good and evil] [We are fighting "human animals"] [Not "ordinary war" but "mythical war" in which humans are fighting the devil]
[Then it is no wonder that Israel is unable to stop the Gaza attacks. It is no wonder that the Israeli aggression against Gaza is unstoppable. It's not a "normal war," but a "mythical war" in which humans are fighting demons. ]）
In the midst of this overall trend, the media narrative has almost always leaned toward the dualism of "right and wrong, reason and untruth, good and evil. This formulaic narrative has, for a time, seemed to improve our outlook on the world. But this clear-cut thinking dislikes things that cannot be explained well. It either pretends that such things do not exist, or sweeps them off the table as something that does exist but is not worthy of observation or analysis. As we repeat this process, only the "things that can be explained well" of the world's phenomena remain on the table, while the "things that cannot be explained well" accumulate voraciously under our feet. Indeed, as far as the tabletop is concerned, the story is very clear. It is too neat and clear. However, the irregular-shaped things that had been knocked off the table were deposited at our feet like sticky filth, having lost their place of destination. This discomfort, in turn, increases our reckless desire to "clear the story" more and more.
（※ Who is [the one I can't explain well]...）
The disease of our time manifests itself in the form of a "flattening" orientation in all spheres. "Flattening" in the political realm is usually couched in the worthing that "the problem is very simple. If we identify the "root of all evil" and gut it, all problems will be solved at once and our society will recover its "pristine cleanliness. If we identify the "root of all evil" and cut it out, all problems will be solved at once and our society will recover its "original cleanliness.
（※See
- "Ukraine and Palestine" in this article...[The issue is national sentiment rather than the rationality of the peace agreement itself. It is the "negative emotions" such as anger, hatred, and humiliation that most strongly impel people. ]）
This political discourse has a strong appeal to the masses. For those who have difficulty explaining their misfortunes, there is no greater frustration-relieving service than naming the culprits, "It's them who are bad. Indeed, our society's political heroes have achieved a high degree of popularity through "over-aggressiveness toward the 'bad' guys. The media has almost completely abandoned the habit of counting the virtues of politicians such as "soft-spoken," "deep-thinking," and "patiently trying to persuade their opponents. I have not seen or heard such statements in the media for quite some time. As far as I can commandeer the media, it seems that what is required of politicians nowadays is, above all, speed, clarity, and boldness.
Yes, these people may be good at sweeping "garbage" off the table. But the "swept away people" (unless they are imprisoned in concentration camps or purged) will ultimately act only to make the policies of their politicians fail.
We should have just learned from the Fukushima nuclear disaster a real-life example of how short-term cost-cutting measures created enormous damage in the long run.
We have fewer and fewer opportunities to experience a discourse that gives us a sense of the depth of intellect, the breadth of vision, and the magnitude of human capacity. I believe this is the most critical symptom of the crisis of our times.
There is no difficulty in shouting "crisis, crisis! It is not difficult to say, "The crisis is here. But it is difficult to answer the practical question, "How do we create a space for dialogue and mutual support so that people can pool their wisdom and share the resources they have in order to avert a crisis? It is very difficult. To create such a space requires, above all, tolerance and imagination toward others, but the very fact that the words calling for "tolerance and imagination" are no longer heard everywhere, that is, the fact that people have come together to block the only way to avert a crisis, is a sad fact. It seems to me that this sad fact is the reality of the crisis in our society.
（※〇See
・"Restoration and Accelerationism"
Accelerationism means (...)An outdated ideology such as "democracy," "human rights," or "political correctness" acts as a brake and < strong>concealing the contradictions of capitalism and rather delaying the end of capitalism. Accelerationism is an attempt to release that brake, to let capitalism run amok to its limits, to hasten its death, and to get "out" of capitalism.
・ [The New Nazism] in this article, "Ukraine and Palestine.
In "Fascism of Love and Illusion," [It is a ruthless and hard idea to weed out the weak individuals and build a new post-capitalist world with only those strong people who can survive.
[Fuyuji Suzuhara speaks of this idea as it is.
"The only important thing is that man has become too far removed from animals. Man is just an animal. (...) I will turn man back into an animal."
"The delusion that we must be happy is tormenting the slaves," Suzuhara muses, so "we should thoroughly destroy Japan once and for all."]）
●Preface to "The Withdrawal Theory
This time, we are requesting contributions on the subject of "On Withdrawal". First, let me explain the purpose of the editorial.
This is because, although "withdrawal" should be a pressing issue at a time of declining national power and dwindling national resources, many people seem to be avoiding discussing it. There is no growing momentum to gather the public's knowledge and discuss "What should Japan's withdrawal look like?
(*What does [retreat] mean...?)
What I mean by "retreat" specifically is to respond appropriately to this reality of declining national power. It is a very non-emotional, measured issue of the kind, like shifting one buttonhole on your belt when you lose weight and your girth dips, or wearing thicker clothes because you feel cold. And yet, the thing is institutionally evaded. Why is that?
Correcting and improving the system can only begin with admitting that the system is flawed. However, the current rulers of our country have stubbornly maintained their position of "never admitting fault. And they have been able to stay in power for a long period of time by maintaining the attitude of never admitting failure. "Never admitting failure" is remembered as a successful experience. Therefore, they cling to their successes.
A discussion of "withdrawal" cannot take place without a precise inspection of the suitability of the policies that have been adopted. No discussion can begin without an examination of which policies have worked and which have failed. But that is something that those who currently form the leadership "just don't want to do".
The second reason is a bit more complicated. The politicians themselves acknowledge the objective fact that "Japan will continue to decline," understand the causes, and have already taken countermeasures, but they are unwilling to disclose this process to the public. However, they are not willing to disclose the process to the public.
We know that the pressing political question is "How to distribute our dwindling national resources to whom?" We also know that the pressing political issue is "How to distribute the dwindling national resources to whom?
So, of course, they have already conceived their own "exit strategy. Without that level of wisdom, they cannot be in charge of the government. But we are not going to talk about it in public. Because it is a plan that will result in a rather unfair distribution of national resources. I agree.
Given the pattern of thinking and behavior of their leadership so far, I think it will be a more thoroughgoing version of neoliberal "choice and concentration," concentrate all resources on the strong and abandon the weak. I do not expect Japan's leadership to be ethical enough to think of other solutions.
(*Who are the "strong" and who are the "losers"...)
But if you unveil your "retreat" strategy of "total takeover by the strong" in a situation where people are suffering from pandemic, inflation, and poverty, you are sure to incur the wrath of the majority of the people. It would indeed be difficult to maintain power if you incur the wrath of the majority of voters. So, I'm going to bellyache about it and keep quiet.
I believe that without any public debate, the "withdrawal plan" has already been drafted and steadily implemented within the government department. And one day, when the "point of no return" is crossed, that is, when there is no longer any possibility of adopting any other option than the government-led "withdrawal plan," the government will reveal its hand: "Japan is sinking, but this is the only way we can survive. Strong>. I believe that such a scenario has been created.
I will write about what kind of "scenario" this is in another article.
(* Who am I calling to...?)
Although they hold up a sign that says "diversity and inclusion," the Japanese people have not yet reached the civic maturity to live in harmony with "others" who differ in race, nationality, language, religion, and lifestyle and culture, nor is there even a national consensus on the urgent need for such a civic maturity in the first place. There is not even a national consensus on the urgent need for such civic maturity in the first place. There is no way that such a country can compensate for its declining population with immigration.
But if it remains as it is now, it will only be useful to the world by presenting an example of what not to do, saying "this is how Japan failed to withdraw".
（※ This is the type of message that teachers have been submitting, not only with this symbol, but I think it is fair to say occasionally up to the present.
I doubt that there are many people who know about the commotion who do not understand what "withdrawal" means.
This was also presented today with a different symbol.
Repost [Infinite Lynch].
↑
This is a message from Dr. Tatsuru Uchida
【There is a gag that goes, "I'll leave it at that for today," which I think is very important. Because civic maturity means being able to judge "differences in degree".】
I am very presumptuous, but since this is a record, I would like to state the facts, and it is my understanding that up to now, some time after you submitted your application, you have returned to normal operation and are now in the process of doing so.
↓
〇The following day (March 14, 2024) is Dr. Uchida's repost.
We would like to record this information in near real time.
[An anecdote was also told in "Jump（Japanese Manga Magazines） 40 Years of History Journey (Part 2)"]
To borrow your words, "We are fighting against human animals" , I realized yesterday that I have not been able to see.
I think that this feeling may have penetrated at least to some extent, if not completely, into the minds of those who read the "personal information" that is updated daily.
On the other hand, this experience is probably familiar to many victims of mass stalking
(This is my repost. (This is my repost, translated into English from another victim's post.)
We have to protect everyone's life. If we don't do it, we will be killed. I imagine that many of you may conclude, "It's one or the other, but let's choose the one with the lowest risk.
However, it is theoretically strange. In the Japanese perception, the nuance of the word "withdrawal" fits perfectly with the sense.
The "withdrawal theory" has been frequently messaged for the past two years, and yet, considering the quality of the risk, the highs and lows of the risk should remain the same.
Here is another article introduced by someone else, but a few days ago, the Pope announced a "white flag" advance to Ukraine. I would like to share with you Zelensky's rebuttal to that.
"This is not the kind of place that effectively mediates between those who want to live and those who want to be destroyed, 2,500 kilometers away."
I am sure this is how the victims of mass stalking feel.)
●naive idea that nothing outside of the Constitution applies to Japan
Since this issue is a special issue on the Constitution, I will give my personal views on the Constitution.
It "ought to be empty words," or, to put it a little less acrimoniously, "what's wrong with empty words?"
Like all types of "declarations," constitutions are empty words. However,it is "empty words to visualize a void to be filled," "empty words with pointing power," "empty words to create reality.
Human beings are wicked, stupid, and intolerable creatures, and there is no hope for their improvement. Because once such a view of human nature is sanctioned, the members of that society will be deeply offended by the self-improvement motive of "becoming better and wiser" in the future.
While it may be realistic to design a system in which all members can "live" in a society in which they are evil, stupid, and liars, the better the system is designed, the less likely the members of that society will be "good, wise, and honest. The better the system, the less likely the members of that society will be "good, wise, and honest".
If there is a society that can function even if all its members are wicked, stupid, and liars, there is in principle only one.
If there is a society that can function even if all its members are wicked, stupid, and liars, there is in principle only one. If God has a bird's eye view of all things, and can see every detail of every member's actions and innermost thoughts, society will function even if everyone is wicked, stupid, and a liar. But man is not God.
If this is the case, the next best thing is to create a society in which all members are regarded as "potential sinners" and their every move is monitored by those in power who are appointed as "God's representatives". A reading of the LDP's draft constitution reveals that this is exactly what they are inferring.
Their view of the nation as "all human beings are wicked, stupid, and liars, so those in full power must monitor everyone" and their view of the Constitution as "when there is a discrepancy between the Constitution and reality, it should be rewritten to match reality" are products of completely isomorphic thinking. They are the product of completely isomorphic thinking.
(*[FYI]
- from NOTE text "Questions"
(continued) [A surveillance society is not a society in which the government exhaustively monitors its citizens, but a society in which citizens monitor citizens, snitch on them, and commit violence when the opportunity arises. Conspiracy is a device to create such a society. The Abe administration certainly excels in the art of using human baseness, weakness, and greed as "leverage" to rule the country.
About Conspiracy, the text of The Sense of Omnipotence of the Powers That Be Seen.
"Power feels omnipotent when it does something unreasonable and improper and no one condemns it. That is why dictators throughout history have sought to confirm their omnipotence by forcing their subjects to suffer utterly senseless hardship. ")
(I am sorry to trouble you so much each time, but I would like to ask for the judgment of someone who has known the turmoil since the beginning and is familiar with Dr. Uchida's message. I am sorry for relying on you, but thank you in advance.)
●Long Interview on "Educational Complexity”, Part 2
A Filipino once said, "It is very practical to be able to use English as well as one's mother tongue. It is very practical to be able to use English as well as one's native language, but it is tragic not to be able to speak the same content in one's native language as one speaks in English. I think this is true. In Tagalog, we cannot talk enough about politics, economics, and academics. We do not have the vocabulary to do so. It does not have the sophisticated rhetoric and complex syntax to do so. I think that is what "language colonization" is all about. From the suzerain state's point of view, it was necessary in colonial rule to "nip in the bud" the local people's creativity, so they were left to learn the suzerain state's language, leaving their native language to slim down. That is the same thing Japan did in Korea and Taiwan. By not allowing them to use their mother tongue, and by forcing them to use the language of the suzerain state, they obstructed their access to the "archives of their mother tongue. But deep submergence in the "archive of mother tongues" is inevitably necessary for the generation of new ideas.
(* I am still forbidden to have a dialogue with people from other countries, so I think I repeat myself to the point of being annoyed that they speak differently and do not understand the rules of speech. I think I have been repeating myself to the point of being annoyed that I don't understand the rules of speech and that my language is different from theirs. I apologize for that. When I first started a dialogue with you, I often spoke in the same way domestically, using the analogy of the "suzerain - non-colonial" view of language." (Something along the lines of, "The oppressed and dominated will not be able to tell their own history in their own language as long as they are in that position.")
↓
〇For your information
This is a message from Dr. Uchida
(When I was beginning to change to my current inferior position, I could not see the situation, I could not physically read the air, and I asked everyone around me, "Can you please tell me the logic of why universal values in the West such as human rights and international law are allowed to be violated?" I asked around to everyone around me, "Could you please tell me the logic behind this? This is Dr. Uchida's reply to that question.
[If citizens rise up and demonstrate, "Lift the emergency declaration," the cabinet will naturally recognize this as "disruption of social order. In other words, the very indication of the people's will that "the issuance of the state of emergency is unjustified" is a devilish device that "justifies the issuance of the state of emergency."]
↓
(There was a message today that touched on this update, so I would like to present it as a confirmation from Dr. Uchida.)
〇Messages in Dr. Uchida's reposts that mention other people's topics
【The only thing that "let's follow the rules and give lectures" and "let's be assertive without bothering others" means is that in the end we can only speak within the bounds of what the ruling class allows us to say. I'm sniffling.】
【What I don't like about it is that it assumes that people's claims are accepted only through prescribed routes. I don't know how to say it, but I don't like the feeling of being tamed and not questioning the prevalence of this kind of "clean closure" or something like that.】
↓
〇Message from Professor Uchida
【This is simply status quo positivism, just like "If you want to change the rules, first follow the rules, and only do it after you have risen high enough to change the rules," or "If you want to change the system, first adapt to the system, and only change it after you have risen high enough to change the system.】
●Who will you vote for in the election?
I do not seek complete agreement with my political views on any candidate. They can be quite different. I will base my election on "whether they will create a society that I can personally live in comfortably". To put it in an extreme way, anyone who is willing to physically oppose the order of those in power to "deny Uchida the opportunity to speak," "ban his book," or "imprison him" is fine.
Nevertheless, when we look back at history, we can usually tell what kind of policies will lead to the death of our country.
That is, policies that aim to "return our country to its original state. The reason our country is in the state it is in is because foreign substances have entered from the outside and contaminated our society. Therefore, by detecting and eliminating these foreign substances, society will recover its "original cleanliness and vitality.
Many people have been killed and many valuable things destroyed by people who believed in this type of delusion. I believe that what Russia is doing in Ukraine now, and what China is doing in Xinjiang Uyghur and Hong Kong are driven by this "what the country should be" fantasy. So, I believe that this will eventually become a distant cause of "exile" for both countries. Right now, the people of both China and Russia are giving overwhelming support to those in power, but I believe that each citizen should be asking "What should our country be like? rather than "Is this really the society I want to live in? If people had the habit of asking themselves, "Is this really the society I want to live in?
(*Refer to
Accelerationism in this paper, "Restoration and Accelerationism," in which Accelerationism is (...)An outdated ideology such as "democracy," "human rights," or "political correctness" acts as a brake and hides the contradictions of capitalism and delays rather than strong>concealing the contradictions of capitalism and rather delaying the end of capitalism. Accelerationism is an attempt to release that brake, to let capitalism run amok to its limits, to hasten its death, and to get out "outside" of capitalism.
In "Fascism of Love and Illusion," ["It is a ruthless and hard idea to weed out the weak individuals and build a new post-capitalist world with only those strong people who can survive.
["The delusion that we must be happy is tormenting the slaves," so "we should thoroughly destroy Japan once and for all," Suzuhara muses])
That is why I do not discuss "what the true state of our country should be. I don't want to discuss that, because it won't do me any good. Rather, I try to ask, "Is this really the society I want to live in?" I try to ask the question, "Is this really the society I want to live in? I want to live in a society where basic human rights are respected and civil liberties are protected. That is all. It doesn't matter if the country is poor, or not a military power. I don't want to live in a country that has money, power, and is feared by its neighbors, but where the people have no other means of survival than to bow down to those in power. So, I will support anyone who can make "a society where I can live comfortably".
（*See
, from this paper, "In the Land of Powerocracy"
So they will repeatedly demonstrate that they are excluded from "equality before the law," that the critique of "insanity" does not apply to them, that they have the right to needlessly humiliate others. They will repeatedly demonstrate that they are entitled to unnecessary humiliation of others.）
●In response to the news of the shooting of former Prime Minister Abe
Just after I finished the manuscript, the news came in that "former Prime Minister Abe was shot and went into cardiopulmonary arrest. The use of violence against any person in any political position to interfere with his activities is absolutely unacceptable. I believe that all citizens, regardless of their position, are praying for the safety of Mr. Abe, who was the victim of "absolutely unacceptable violence. Although I have opposed his policies on almost every political issue, I now wish him only a recovery of health and a return to politics.
（※This is a story of violence. I see that "ESP" was a dramatic change in the group stalking situation that has continued to the present day. I think the turning point was there. The note-writing incident caused quite a stir, and I continue to apologize for surprising you all. If it had not been for this, your evaluation of group stalking might have changed a little. It has been over a year since then, and here I am, rolling along. But while it seems like a lot of noise was made then, including the "serial killer" charges, etc., I can assure you that what I have written to you is exactly what I have been doing, with the exception of self-protection. The alerts do continue daily, and I am sure there is some circumstantial evidence going up, such as "scary expressions," but it is the stalker's view of the world in the press that makes it seem bigger. The stalker might also say my statement that way. I may have caused fear, disbelief, discomfort, and a tantalizing reality for all of you. I wish I could find a better way to tell you, but I say that it is awareness that fights off bias. If you can see what is happening between Mr. Uchida and myself, with the awareness that "I don't want to be deceived by anyone, be it me, a stalker, or anyone else," I think you will see things in a different light. (I am sorry about what is going on between Mr. Itoi and me, but it is just like the exchange of alerts.）。
「I have been ridiculed as "why are you saying that with your cheeks scrunched up LOL", "your face has aged like a different person from before", "skeleton"........ I had promises to make to everyone, and honestly, I didn't know what the reaction on sns would be, so I kept quiet for a long time. One morning I woke up in pain as usual, saw myself in the mirror, and felt my life was in danger.
For months, including today, I have been submitting a group of messages such as "Dr. Uchida, you are persistent", "lightning", "nuclear power plant", "violence", and other representations, but that was before it happened.
When you combine your transforming self with your teacher's daily messages, you start defending yourself from the moment you feel fear, simply saying, "I'm going to be killed, this is what I'm going to do.
Of course, in everyday life, this would be an impolite question considering the relationship between the two, but here we are in a relationship where lives are about to be taken away. For some reason, the alerts issued by the teacher have led to heated criticism that ``I am attacking the teacher,'' so I would like to ask the teacher a question. She asks, "Why do you keep alerting me that you're under attack while you're attacking yourself?"
〇Dr. Uchida's message:
[They brutally murdered about 6,000 children in Gaza in a matter of weeks in what they called retaliation for terrorism. [You have the right to defend yourself!)
（※Who is the one who "brutally murdered a child"? Who, in turn, has the right to [defend themselves]?）
Afterwards, as I endure the pain, I ask, ``Can you please stop?'' The teacher will be returned.
↓
〇Dr. Uchida's message.
[Probably 6 lanes (3+3).
(* This is a picture of a road where all traces of the lanes have disappeared without a trace.)
Since then, for more than six months, it has been my daily habit to put out the "nuclear power plant" sign every morning as soon as I wake up. And every day I send out more than 10 messages, maybe not quite 20, but quite a few.
【Can you please be a decoy for those around the doctor
Today is terrible, was there something wrong on the temporary source....】
【Doctor, why can't we stop all day...】
【Please doctor...I just can't stop...why is that?…】
・・・
I will not confirm your reactions. Is this creepy, or is it not something to pay attention to? I think "demonization" of evil people is a necessary process in the media, and since we are up to "non-human" and "demonic", I think we have reached the final form in terms of representation.
What I am wondering is that the reality is the opposite of this composition, and the situation has somehow fallen into the hands of this propaganda. As for me, I keep appealing to you as one of the few measures I can take, but I wonder how the issue of "violence" is perceived by you... I may remove this note from the record after a while.）
（※Sir, it's too tight, could you please stop?…）
（We accept your criticism that the wording is too harsh. I wonder how much smoother the process would be if we could adjust some of the details in a timely manner in light of your input. Unfortunately, however, this is a trial in absentia under house arrest. I am writing this without being able to read the air (clumsily & physically) and without being able to collate the appropriate speech, so I hope you will forgive me if I have taken you out of the context of the courtroom. (I will make every effort to do so with some degree of difficulty.)
(Regarding the part that I deleted yesterday, I believe that you have sent your voice for its restoration. I would like to thank you for this as well. As a supplementary note, I would like to take your word for it and reinstate yesterday's part, although it is of an odd length and may be quite difficult to read.
They say that humans have difficulty recognizing the subject matter. When the subject of the description itself is cruel, it has often been the case that the victim who is making it known, not the perpetrator of the subject, is ironically the one who is under fire. Also, making known does not mean attacking, but simply informing people of the fact. I am also aware that I may not be paying enough attention to what I write, but please consider the possibility that the subject and the object may be inverted.
As for the prolonged turmoil, it is inevitable that the Internet will continue to expand and branch out in detail. Flames and group stalking are both multi-layered. In such cases, there is a way of thinking that goes back to the origins of the problem to identify it. This is not a superficial understanding or an inflammatory response, but a way to think about the problem and to "avoid being fooled" by the motive and purpose of the problem.
In my article "ABOUT IT," I placed "sexual harassment" first, a message that has been repeated. However, in approaching the events and looking at them in detail, I would like to share with you a different exchange that preceded it with the teacher.
I am asked to revamp and re-up a certain movie comment. This is the starting point. I checked the date and it was already 9 years ago. I receive the response that it is a "failure". That is an evaluation of what I submitted, so I can't help it. I am sorry that I could not be of help to you.
So, if you will pardon the inharmonious expression, that is when Dr. Uchida began a series of messages that could be described as slanderous about me day after day. I was surprised, and for my part, I honestly apologized again and again.
〇This will be Dr. Uchida's message on that occasion.
【I'm waking up from a nightmare after sleeping twice. I dreamed that I was having a discussion with Mr. 00 and someone on the floor started shouting "Don't listen to Uchida" and I asked him "Could you hold a lecture by yourself and talk about that kind of thing there?】【I wonder if the violent nature that is repressed on a daily basis is released in dreams.】
(After receiving this message, I will re-up my film comment, but the same process will be repeated.)
No matter how uncompromising a political conflict may be, it should be the "free speech" class that decides the reasonableness of the conflict, and I will not accept any other means. I would like to reiterate that.
However, in the past few years, the language of political discussion in Japanese society has become less "moderate" than "free" as the years went by. I think we all felt that.
Still, "violent words" are just "words" and words do not hurt people deeply. I think many people believed that. But that is not true.
As abuses, lies, and propaganda come to dominate the speech arena, people begin to lose confidence that the speech arena has the power to judge which words "need to be heard" and which "need to go away. When confidence in the judging power of the free speech arena is lost, the expectation of the reality-transforming power of physical violence expands. When confidence in speech is lost, the abhorrent idea that only physical force is determinative enters people's minds. The two are in a zero-sum relationship.
（※See
- "The Relationship between Dr. Uchida and the Disturbance, and His Recent Message" [Lies]
From "The Relationship between Dr. Uchida and the Disturbance, and His Recent Message" [Lies]
This is a repost of a quote by Dr. Uchida
"The fact that no matter how many lies are piled on top of lies, they are not punished is the fundamental principle of "having power.
The fundamental principle of Abe's politics was that no matter how many lies he told, he would not be punished for "having power. Therefore, the administration is supposed to protect her at all costs. Because the LDP administration can never accept the rule that "if you lie, you will be penalized. ] (Who is [Abe]?）
What is needed to deter political violence is not to strengthen the police or the military. It is to re-create free speech that is sufficiently credible, logical, emotional, and moderate. That work can begin right here, right now.
（※See
, from this article, "Ukraine and Palestine.
【The problem is public sentiment rather than the rationality of the peace agreement itself. It is the "negative emotions" such as anger, hatred, and humiliation that drive people most strongly.】）
・'Dr. Uchida's relationship to the uproar, and his recent message.'【intimidation of me】より
【（In the quote rt, in response to the current events of "Trump's campaign to his supporters".）
↑
Dr. Uchida's message, "'Trump has vehemently cursed the government agencies' investigation of him and issued a dark warning about the "death and destruction" that will occur if he is ever indicted. .」】
・This will be the teacher's message the day after I write this. I would like to see that the exchange has been established and would like to record it.
【（※Yesterday, I updated my text on the subject of "violence".）】
（※A teaser video of a famous Japanese gun movie. Symbolic shooting scenes are repeated many times.）
●About State Funerals
(*I will make this known. I think it is no exaggeration to say that the following message will be a message that has been repeated frequently by the teacher, even through the uproar. I have also informed you many times of messages that have the same meaning to you. It is very impolite, considering the difference in our positions, but by the time I got here, I had spent nine years in the uproar and lost all of mine. The group stalking was well known before it started, and the teacher's name was done anonymously. However, I am not recording this as a matter of emotion. I would appreciate it if you would please include that context.
Public awareness may look like a personal attack on the act itself, and we say that people cannot identify the subject matter, who is terrible. But information about your public position, which has a significant impact on society, is meant to be in the public interest, just as the news is. That privileged position itself is a theme here as well. Thank you for your understanding.)
I contributed to various media about the state funeral. This was a comment requested by "Akahata," but it was lost. It seems that they did not like the part about Prime Minister Kishida "not being as evil as former Prime Minister Abe.
The prime minister probably did not anticipate that opposition to the state funeral would be so high. Even if there is no legal basis, even if the Diet does not deliberate on the matter, the people will ultimately silently accept what the Cabinet decides. The eight years of the Abe administration have proven just that. Prime Minister Kishida is simply copying that "success story.
The mighty power wielded by former Prime Minister Abe was a kind of loop structure. No matter how much the people opposed him, no matter how much the opposition parties opposed him, no matter how little rational basis he had for doing what he wanted to do, he pushed through with what he wanted to do. The people then reasoned that he was able to do such reckless things because he had the mighty power to back it up. Then, they reached a state of resignation, saying, "If he is so powerful, there is no use in resisting him. In other words, his power was based on people's assumption that he was able to act so powerfully because he really had power. It's a well-designed mechanism.
(*[National funeral]...a symbol often used as an analogy for my execution by mass stalking. Who is former Prime ［Minister Abe]?
〇 [For your information]
- From my article "ABOUT IT"
This is the message of what you repeatedly claimed at the start of the uproar. It is about "sexual harassment." The name of my movie comment account was a woman's name (the name of a pet I used to have).
【I think you are right. Since power is assured by "doing things that others would be punished for doing, but not you", people with power will always do "those things" when they want to confirm their status (when they feel insecure). And they can't stop doing it until one day they are finally punished.】
・This article, Comments from a teacher on collusion. Six years before this article.
About the conspiracy charge, the text of "The feeling of omnipotence of those in power is visible.
[Powerful people feel omnipotent when they do something irrational and improper and no one condemns them for it. That is why dictators throughout history have sought to confirm their omnipotence by forcing their subjects to suffer utterly senseless hardship. ]）
●The Political Disappointment of a State Funeral
（The same social events are the subject of the text above.）
Why did the Kishida cabinet lose the public's trust so suddenly?
Why did the Kishida cabinet lose public confidence so suddenly?
Support for the government's decision to force a state funeral for former Prime Minister Abe, which had no legal basis, without parliamentary debate, caused a sudden drop in support. But I don't think the public blamed the government for this rule violation. But I don't think the public blamed the government for this rule-breaking, since government "rule-breaking" had already become routine over the past decade, and it had no effect on cabinet approval ratings during the Abe era.
The Abe era got away with it. Once he won the election, he was able to pretend that he had the "will of the people" and ignore the public's opposition to any individual issue, no matter how much it might be opposed by the public. The people were led to believe that the fact that the government could ignore the opposition of the people was proof that it was established on a solid foundation of power. The people rationalized that the reason they could behave so powerfully was because they actually had power, and they gave up defying the powers that be.
That he was thus "able" to ignore the law, the Constitution, and the opposition of the people for ten years is, paradoxically, an admission that Shinzo Abe, the politician, had "the power superior to other prime ministers.
The "lesson" of Abe's politics is that the best way to gain the will of the people is to show no effort at all to gain it, and the two following governments foolishly followed suit and lost support in a short time.
（※【Who is [Abe]...?
〇Refer to
・From "In the Land of Powerocracy" in this paper
["Powerocracy" is different. It is because the basis of legitimacy of those in power is that they "already have power."]
"In a 'powercracy' country, criticism of those in power is not allowed."]
[In a "powercracy" society, the very fact that one can "behave powerfully" is the basis for the legitimacy of "being in power". Wow. ]
えＧSo they will repeatedly demonstrate that they are excluded from "equality before the law," that the critique of "insanity" does not apply to them, and that they have the right to needlessly humiliate others.】）
●Decline in Japan's research capabilities
（※So far in this paper, we have dealt with texts "referring to the disturbance. We have presented a text in which the teacher talks about the disturbance at a certain language level. We would like to include this as a sample for testing purposes and to serve as the meaning of the doublespeak table. We would like to withdraw it depending on your response. We will upload it with the aim of providing a three-dimensional understanding of the disturbance, and we ask for your consideration!）
In 2015, the School Education Law was revised and the authority of the University Faculty Council was largely killed. The university became a "stock company-like" top-down organization with authority concentrated in the president and chancellor. This was supposed to make the university's organizational management revolutionarily more efficient. Perhaps "efficiency" was achieved. But the result was a "selection and concentration" that reduced personnel, cut budgets, and allocated funds only to research programs that were likely to be successful in the short term. But the result is this bottomless decline in research capacity. How do those who have led educational reform sum up this miserable result?
That is a rhetorical question, and I know the answer. I know the answer, which is that there was not enough reform. The government's policies were 100% correct, but they did not achieve the desired results because of the stubborn and perverse teachers and staff on the front lines who resisted their implementation. Therefore, the authority of the top management should be further strengthened and the right of self-discretion should be taken away from the frontlines. If only yes-men who faithfully follow the agenda of the top management are employed, and those who oppose the agenda are eliminated, Japan's research capability will recover in a V-shape. As long as those who believe so remain in key policy-making positions, the decline of Japan's research capabilities and the democratization of universities will not stop.
（※ For your reference
From "In the Land of Powerocracy" in this paper.
【The "powerocracy" is different. It is because the basis for the legitimacy of those in power is that they "already have power".】
「In a country of [powerocracy], criticism of those in power is not tolerated.】
【In a society of "powerocracy," the very fact that one can "behave powerfully" is the basis for the legitimacy of "being powerful." Oh my.】
【So they repeat that they are excluded from "equality before the law," that the label "insane" does not apply to them, and that they have the right to cause unnecessary humiliation to others. I will make an appeal.】）
・拙稿『◆Dr. Uchida's relationship with the riots and his recent message◆』『intimidation of university officials』より
Here is Dr. Uchida's message
(in an article about the administration's desire to give powerful authority to the university's extramural commissioners) 【They want to control education, probably because they believe that a corporation is the ideal of an organization. They believe that it is the "global standard" for the CEO to have total power, to heavily employ those employees who follow the agenda, and to fire those who disobey, and they believe that they can apply that to the university. I don't know how you can be so foolish.】
↓
Six hours later on the same day 【Board Meeting. Almost all of them were personnel affairs, so I was a "Narabidaimyo" without a chance to speak. Now, I'm going back to Musako. After all, I didn't have time to eat lunch. I was hungry.】
※Narabidaimyo [Lord of the line]. …In kabuki, an actor who merely stands in a line dressed as a feudal lord. In other words, a person who is merely present but does nothing of any use. A person like that. ー From goo dictionary
集団ストーキングは別名を「ソロ・ホロコースト」という緊張感を強いるような表現をされることがあります。私も体験するまでは、名前だけは聞いたことはありましたが、正直のところ６割は信じていない程度の認識でした。
NPOの専門家に「集団ストーカー」と指摘されたのは２年程も前になります。ご指摘を受けてから、「何とかしなくては」とあれこれ行動を起こすのですが、今考えると休みがちでのんびりしたものだったと思います。頭では理解していても、真に受けてはいないという感じだったかもしれません。「急速に拡大する」「最後まで行われる」とその特徴を伝えられました。「最後」とは何か。身動きが取れなくなって、部屋に引きこもりになり、そこれでも止まることはないというご説明を受けました。
事実を記述し、公開するというのは、その後に起こるであろうハレーションを考えると緊張を強いる行為です。書く人間にも大きな痛手を負わせるのが、周知の大きな難関になっています。それら含めたシリアスな性質は、事実の衆知という行為自体に伴うものですので、ある程度の深刻さはどうかお許しいただきたいと思います。
私は社会的には底辺に属する立場です。ここでは周知するという立場であり、騒動は昨日、今日、始まったことではなく、社会に拡大されてきましたので、不調法を押して記述したいと思います。敬意は欠かさないように注意しながら。
また、皆様とはコンセンサスの共有に大きな壁が立ちはだかっています。私は一次ソースのURLを知りません。皆様のご反応を確認して、応答することができません。ストーカーのかたに提供されている情報群とそれによって展開されている世界観、歴史観は私のものとは一致はないでしょう。これをコインテルプロと言います。しかし、残念ながらそこには事実が含まれ、不信を買っていることと思います。それについてはSNS上に半永久的に漂い、私は人生で背負っていくしかないと思っています。
現在進行中の集団ストーカーには前段があり、その期間は集団ストーキングよりも長期に及びます。集団ストーキングは３年近く、騒動自体は前段を含めてますと、かれこれ８年になります。ますが、その発端から現在まで中心となって指揮、扇動されてきたのが内田樹先生となります。
（端緒のパートの詳細は『ABOUT IT』をご参照いただければと存じます。
『ABOUT IT −再掲バージョン −』
https://note.com/xr448/n/n92c59ebc6c36
『ABOUT IT - re-published version -』（英語バージョン）
https://note.com/j_oot/n/n2225c0427c06）
個人的には、どの考察よりもはみ出すことのない、もっとも端的で包括された表現だと感じてきました。集団ストーカーが開始される以前からの考察です。
それは、私に強い同意や、時には強烈な一致を見る思いと、信じがたいような違和感が衝突するような感覚を呼び起こしてきました。騒動が始まる前、私は内田先生の愛読者でした。日本を代表する識者によるご著書を次々読破していくような季節を持っていました。映画批評の書籍は第一作目ではなかったでしょうか。一方的に共感を持たせていただいたのを覚えています。
先生の洞察には、騒動の第一者の主観でありながら同時に第三者の客観性という困難な両立を見ることができると思います。
では、その変遷をご紹介してまいりたいと思います。
（前文が長い、濃い…ご批判いただいたかもしれません。今日のご挨拶からつなげたもので読みやすいかと思ったのですが、点検してみますね。少々お待ちください。
情報のご提供ありがとうございます。いつもお世話になっています。）
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
■騒動開始から1年と4か月。
私は不在。先生の私に対するメッセージ、騒動の牽引が高じていきます。一方で、批判、牽制の声も。
テレビを通じ、放送テーマに掛けて私へのメッセージを呼びかけることでひとつのピークを迎えます。そして、先生は騒動の説明を求められることになります。
時系列順に。 放映から約20日前のサイン。
↓
その２日後
上からの一連の流れから「嘘も百回」や「印象操作」「子ども」といった言葉が文脈を知る人たちから上ります。
↓
さらに１日後
↓
10日後
（これは私宛のテキストの中でも代表的なものの1つで、複数回提示されます。）
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
『○○○リバタリアンという怪物』
（特に私に対するメッセージと思われる部分を抜粋）
相模原の大量殺人事件のもたらした最大の衝撃は、植松聖容疑者が事前に安倍晋三首相宛てと大島理森衆院議長宛てに犯行を予告する内容の書簡を届けていたことにある。
自分の行為が政権と国会多数派には「好ましい」ものとして受け止められ、権力からの同意と保護を得られるだろうという期待をこめたものだった。逮捕後も容疑者は「権力者に守られているので、自分は死刑にはならない」という趣旨の発言をしている。
もちろん、これは容疑者の妄想に過ぎない。けれども、何の現実的根拠もない妄想ではない。彼の妄想形成を強化するような現実が今の日本社会内部にはたしかに存在しているからである。
アナウンサーの長谷川豊は事件の直後の２０１６年９月に自身のブログに「自業自得の人工透析患者なんて、全員実費負担にさせよ！無理だと泣くならそのまま殺せ！今のシステムは日本を亡ぼすだけだ！！」というタイトルの記事を投稿した。
重篤な病人や障害者に対する公然たる差別発言にはまだ一定の社会的な規制が働いており、有名人の場合には、それなりの批判を受けて、社会的制裁が課されているが、在日コリアン、生活保護受給者やＬＧＢＴなどの社会的弱者に対する差別や攻撃の発言はほとんど何のペナルティもないままに垂れ流しされている。
際立つのが片山さつき議員で、生活保護受給者は「実質年収４百万円」の生活をしているという無根拠な都市伝説の流布に加担して、生活保護叩き発言を繰り返してきたが、最近も捏造投稿に基づいてNHKのニュース内容にクレームをつけて、生活保護受給者が社会福祉の「フリーライダー」だという世論の喚起に励んでいる。もちろん、本人がそう「信じている」という信憑の問題もあるのだろうが、「そういうこと」を公言すると選挙で票が集まるという現実的な打算も同時に働いているはずである。
アメリカではドナルド・トランプ大統領が「弱者叩き」の代表格である。「ラストベルト」のプア・ホワイトたちの輿望を担って登場したはずのトランプだが、就任後実施された政策は富裕層への厚遇措置ばかりで、移民排斥や、海外企業の国内移転への圧力などの「雇用対策」は今ここにいる社会的弱者のためには何の利益ももたらしてはいない。
今の日本で起きている「弱者叩き」はアメリカ原産のリバタリアニズムが日本に漂着し、日本独特の陰湿なしかたで退廃したものだと私は理解している。
他者からの同情や公的支援を当てにしてはならない。医療保険制度はいらない（医療は「サービス」なのだから金を出して買え。金がないやつは死ね）。公立学校も要らない（教育は「サービス」なのだから、金を出して買え。金がないやつは働いて学費を稼ぐか、有利子で借りろ）。社会福祉制度はいらない（他人の施しがないと生きていけないやつは死ね）と、ずいぶん非人情ではあるけれど、バケツの底が抜けたように「あっけらかん」としている。
しかし、さすがに日本では（心ではそう思っていても）そこまでは言い切れない。居酒屋のカウンターで酔余の勢いで口走ることはあるだろうが、公的な立場ではなかなか口にはできない。
その不徹底をとりつくろうために、日本的リバタリアンは「排外主義」的イデオロギーを装飾的に身にまとう。そして、貧乏人も、病人も、障害者も、生活保護受給者も、みな本質的には「外国人」であるという摩訶不思議な理説を噛ませることで、話のつじつまを合わせようとするのである。
植松容疑者がこれは「日本のために」したのだとか、「社会が賛同するはずだった」とかいう自己弁明を繰り返し、「国益を害するものたち」を「処分」する「官許」を首相や衆院議長に申請したことには論理的には必然性があったのである。彼は自分が「○○○リバタリアン」という政治的奇形物であり、現在の日本の政界の指導者たちの多くが程度の差はあれ自分の「同類」だと直感していたのである。
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
先生に対して「嘘」「イジメ」などの批判が続出
■騒動開始から1年と4か月
私は不在。先生の私に対するメッセージ、騒動の牽引が高じていきます。一方で、批判、牽制の声も。
テレビを通じ、放送テーマに掛けて私へのメッセージを呼びかけることでひとつのピークを迎えます。そして、先生は騒動の説明を求められることになります。
時系列順に。 放映から約20日前のサイン。
〇内田先生のポストです
【とりあえず原稿二つ仕上げました。一つは「小児看護学会」のための抄録。一つは劇団「態変」の出してる「イマージュ」に寄稿した「津久井やまゆり園事件」について。「愛国リバタリアン」という奇形的な政治的生き物がどうやって出現したかについて。は～、疲れた。ちょっとやすも。】
↓
その２日後
〇先生のポストです。
【『GQ』の原稿、４５００字をリタッチ。共謀罪の話。これ先月号にも書きませんでしたっけ？まあ、いいや。機会がある限り「共謀罪のどこが問題か」は書いておかないとね。僕が恐ろしいのは「国内に国を滅ぼそうとしているたくさんの人々が共謀の機会をうかがっている」という法制定の前提です。】
【処罰のおそれも報復のおそれもないと知るといくらでも卑劣にも暴力的にもなれる人間がこの世には一定数存在していることを僕は経験的に知っています。ふつうの市民社会では出番がない彼らですが、共謀罪は彼らに「政府がオレたちの活躍を期待している」という錯覚をもたらします。】
【相模原のやまゆり園での大量殺人事件の植松容疑者は事件の前に首相と衆院議長に書簡を送りましたが、それは彼らから「殺人許可」がもらえるかもしれないと期待していたからです。だから事件後も「権力者に守られているから死刑にはならない」などと口走っていたのです。】
（続きです）【もちろんこれは妄想に過ぎせんけれど、妄想に燃料を備給したのは、ヘイトスピーチや生活保護受給者への罵倒や「病気は自己責任」論や嫌韓・嫌中本であり、特定秘密保護法や共謀罪の前提にある「国内に反日勢力がうじゃうじゃいる」という現実認識です。それらはリアルに今ここに存在しています。】
上からの一連の流れから「嘘も百回」や「印象操作」「子ども」といった言葉が文脈を知る人たちから上ります。
↓
さらに１日後
〇【『GQ』原稿送稿。共謀罪について。この法律は当面は「一罰百戒」的運用されて、反政府的人物を恣意的に選び出して、恣意的に処罰し、メディアを怯え上がらせることと市民の間に相互監視・相互不信感情を扶植することをめざすと思います。市民の相互監視・密告が一番監視コストが安いですから。】
↓
10日後
〇【劇団態変の金満里さんのご依頼で『イマージュ』に「相模原事件」について一文を寄稿しました。事件そのものはもう忘れられ始めていますけれど、この事件が露呈した日本社会の歪みは日々さらに亢進しています。】
(※これは私宛のテキストの中でも代表的なものの1つで、複数回提示されます)
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
『○○○リバタリアンという怪物』
（特に私に対するメッセージと思われる部分を抜粋）
相模原の大量殺人事件のもたらした最大の衝撃は、植松聖容疑者が事前に安倍晋三首相宛てと大島理森衆院議長宛てに犯行を予告する内容の書簡を届けていたことにある。
自分の行為が政権と国会多数派には「好ましい」ものとして受け止められ、権力からの同意と保護を得られるだろうという期待をこめたものだった。逮捕後も容疑者は「権力者に守られているので、自分は死刑にはならない」という趣旨の発言をしている。
もちろん、これは容疑者の妄想に過ぎない。けれども、何の現実的根拠もない妄想ではない。彼の妄想形成を強化するような現実が今の日本社会内部にはたしかに存在しているからである。
アナウンサーの長谷川豊は事件の直後の２０１６年９月に自身のブログに「自業自得の人工透析患者なんて、全員実費負担にさせよ！無理だと泣くならそのまま殺せ！今のシステムは日本を亡ぼすだけだ！！」というタイトルの記事を投稿した。
重篤な病人や障害者に対する公然たる差別発言にはまだ一定の社会的な規制が働いており、有名人の場合には、それなりの批判を受けて、社会的制裁が課されているが、在日コリアン、生活保護受給者やＬＧＢＴなどの社会的弱者に対する差別や攻撃の発言はほとんど何のペナルティもないままに垂れ流しされている。
際立つのが片山さつき議員で、生活保護受給者は「実質年収４百万円」の生活をしているという無根拠な都市伝説の流布に加担して、生活保護叩き発言を繰り返してきたが、最近も捏造投稿に基づいてNHKのニュース内容にクレームをつけて、生活保護受給者が社会福祉の「フリーライダー」だという世論の喚起に励んでいる。もちろん、本人がそう「信じている」という信憑の問題もあるのだろうが、「そういうこと」を公言すると選挙で票が集まるという現実的な打算も同時に働いているはずである。
アメリカではドナルド・トランプ大統領が「弱者叩き」の代表格である。「ラストベルト」のプア・ホワイトたちの輿望を担って登場したはずのトランプだが、就任後実施された政策は富裕層への厚遇措置ばかりで、移民排斥や、海外企業の国内移転への圧力などの「雇用対策」は今ここにいる社会的弱者のためには何の利益ももたらしてはいない。
今の日本で起きている「弱者叩き」はアメリカ原産のリバタリアニズムが日本に漂着し、日本独特の陰湿なしかたで退廃したものだと私は理解している。
他者からの同情や公的支援を当てにしてはならない。医療保険制度はいらない（医療は「サービス」なのだから金を出して買え。金がないやつは死ね）。公立学校も要らない（教育は「サービス」なのだから、金を出して買え。金がないやつは働いて学費を稼ぐか、有利子で借りろ）。社会福祉制度はいらない（他人の施しがないと生きていけないやつは死ね）と、ずいぶん非人情ではあるけれど、バケツの底が抜けたように「あっけらかん」としている。
しかし、さすがに日本では（心ではそう思っていても）そこまでは言い切れない。居酒屋のカウンターで酔余の勢いで口走ることはあるだろうが、公的な立場ではなかなか口にはできない。
その不徹底をとりつくろうために、日本的リバタリアンは「排外主義」的イデオロギーを装飾的に身にまとう。そして、貧乏人も、病人も、障害者も、生活保護受給者も、みな本質的には「外国人」であるという摩訶不思議な理説を噛ませることで、話のつじつまを合わせようとするのである。
植松容疑者がこれは「日本のために」したのだとか、「社会が賛同するはずだった」とかいう自己弁明を繰り返し、「国益を害するものたち」を「処分」する「官許」を首相や衆院議長に申請したことには論理的には必然性があったのである。彼は自分が「○○○リバタリアン」という政治的奇形物であり、現在の日本の政界の指導者たちの多くが程度の差はあれ自分の「同類」だと直感していたのである。
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
↑
先生に対して「嘘」「イジメ」などの批判が続出
さらに翌日。
共謀罪について、『権力者の全能感が見える』の文章。
「権力者が全能感を覚えるのは、不合理で、不適切なことをしても誰もそれを咎（とが）めない時である。だから歴史上の独裁者たちはまったく無意味な苦役をその臣民に強いることで、おのれの全能を確認しようとしたのである。」
そして、
〇 【朝稽古だん。共謀罪は採決されました。この法律によって政府は「気に入らない人間をいくらでも拘束できる法律」を手に入れました。共謀罪に賛成の議員たちの多くが「理想郷」として思い描いているシンガポールに一気に近づきました。 】
↑
ある方の「体罰」「暴行」という批判の声。
（上記一連のメッセージとは別に連日、先生の私に対するサインは平行。）
〇上から3日後。テレビ出演。
(※ 騒動を府来るから知る人にとっては、こちらもベーシックに繰り返されているお話かと存じます。)
【共謀罪通った朝から僕のツイッターのところに来たクソ”リプ”(返信)すごかったですよ。】
【「日本から出て行け」とか】
【”市民が市民を監視する社会が到来した”】
【本当にね、共謀罪があけたチャンネルというのは市民が市民を密告したり、どう喝したり、罵倒したり、自分の隣人を敵だとみなすことを政府が奨励していると】
【一番怖いのは市民による市民の密告】
【ゲシュタポ(ナチスの秘密警察)の場合なんかでも、ほとんで、隣人が隣人を密告した】
【何をやっているかというと、国会審議には意味がないんだということを、まさにその印象を 国民に広く植えつけるということを目的として、一貫してやってると】
【結局どれほど野党が反対しようと内閣が決めた法律は必ず通るんだと】
【法の執行機関と制定機関が同一であるような同一形態のことを 『独裁』というわけですから】
↑
テレビを通じたメッセージは、多くの賛同を得る一方、「権力の私物化」「個人攻撃」「悪意と憎悪」といった批判も受けます。
●文章アップ後の反応。
現在から約1年10ヶ月前になりますが、当時の反応も記しておきます。この文章のテレビ出演の流れから説明を求められる交信は、他の方の助力もあって、後に先生から事実確認をいただきました。ただし、3日後には否定のメッセージが散見され出します。
〇事実確認をしていただいた後、先生のサイン
↓
〇3日後、先生から
【ホロコースト虚偽説を描いたDenial という映画があります。歴史修正主義はどんな妄説も、その正否にかかわる論争に持ち込みさえすれば、それなりの学問的根拠があるように見えることを利用する、という実話の映画化。歴史修正主義は「両論併記に持ち込んだら勝ち」なんです。】
（続きです）【Denial の邦題は「否定と肯定」。いきなり「両論併記」に持ち込んで歴史修正主義者に軍配をあげてしまいました。配給会社は映画を観ないでタイトルを作ったのか、悪意があったのか、どちらか？でも、この「両論併記」による迂回的な妄説支援はどうやら今の日本のメディアの常套手段であるようです。】
ここから先生のメッセージに「デマ」「ウソ」というワードが頻出されるようになります。
（※追記 拙稿『内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ』中、『嘘について』の項目をご参照いただければと思います。）
〇内田先生
【ううむ。真相はますます藪の中ですな。でも、久しぶりに名前見ましたダリオ・アルジェント。】
対して、
〇私のメッセージ
【佐藤先生に置かれましては、事実の誤認、味方の相違がございましたら、抽象的な”ウソ””デマ”といった声でなく、ぜひ具体的にご指摘いただきたいと思います。上でも自分のダメな部分を挙げましたが、こちらに一転の間違いも存在しないなどとは、けっして想像していません。ぜひ、指摘してください。】
こちらの問いかけと先生のメッセージが平行線になります。
■以下は、拙稿『◆内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ◆』からの資料になります。
●権力の私物化
このテーマは、ギャングストーキングが始まる以前から、多くのかたから批判が上がっていたもので、批判する方のメッセージ、対する内田先生のメッセージの応答は他の記録でも取り扱ってきました。
〇内田先生のリポストです。
【自民党政権である限り、このような「権力の私物化」は反省なく繰り返され、役所はその隠蔽や改ざん、言い訳に追われる。国が壊れていく。今、この国と国民が問われている。】
〇内田先生のリポストです。
【映画「妖怪の孫」の上映への露骨な“圧力と忖度”。背筋に寒気が走った。これが、岸田首相始め自民党幹部が言う“自由で民主的な”日本社会で起きているのだ。これは「まあ、そんなこともあるか」というような目で見過ごしてよい話ではない。自由と民主主義を脅かす者たちが、背後で蠢いているのだ。】
（※『妖怪の孫』は内田先生の符丁として使われる元安倍首を主題にしたドキュメンタリー映画です。）
〇
内田先生のリポストです。
【「岸田総理も自民党も腹を抱えてゲラゲラ笑っている。ちょろいもんだと。権力を使ってやりたい放題でも、五輪で大儲けしても、統一教会と癒着しても、隠蔽・改ざんで善良な現場公務員を死に追いやっても、みんなきれいに忘れて支持してくれる。」】
【＞「だから日本はここまで壊れた。こんなんで本当によいのか？」】
【（※ 「岸田総理」とは誰を指しているのでしょうか？）】
〇
内田先生のリポストです
【「アベノミクスは失敗ではない。もし失敗して経済が悪くなっているんだったら、とっくに選挙に失敗して政権を失ってる。アベノミクスは成功だった。」】
↑
内田先生のメッセージです。
【これが典型的なpowsercracyの語り口です。「今権力の座にいるということはすべての政策が正しく、それゆえ民意を得ているからである。われわれへの批判はわれわれが現に権力の座に言えるという一事をもってすべて棄却される」。超え、現代日本社会が罹患している重篤な病です。】
（※【アベノミクス】とは、安倍政権時にとられた経済政策の総称。「安倍」とは、内田先生を示す代表的な符丁です）
〇
内田先生のメッセージです。
【今の日本のメディアは「言論の自由」の名において「権力のある人間」「声のでかい人間」が言論の場を支配することを無批判に看過しています。常識の名において「いい加減にしなさい」と良俗に反する言葉をたしなめることもメディアの仕事のうちだとは思いませんか。】
（続きです）【今の日本医決定的にかけているのは「常識」だと思います。「それは非常識だ」という判断が現実的な抑止力にならない。法律に基づかないと、あるいは実力による禁圧がないと「非常識な言動」が抑止できない社会は「野蛮な社会」です。】
〇
内田先生へのご批判のリポスト
‟悲しいですが、本邦は古から「いじめればいじめるほど、成員は言われるがままになる」という手段が効果的なんでしょう。”
↑
対して内田先生のメッセージです。
【これはほんとうにその通りですね。政治家がどれほど理不尽なことをしても「この人は理不尽なことをしても罰されないほど権力があるからそうしているに違いない」と国民は推論してくれる。だから「威張れる立場になるためには威張ってみせるのが一番効果的」という経験則が通用してしまう。】
●ファシズム系
〇
内田先生のリポストです。
（こちらのリポストは、内田先生に対して挙がったファシズム批判、一連のものです。）
【ドイツの政府機関
「1944年の今日7月20日は、ヒトラーの暗殺未遂事件があった日。軍の一部の将校らがナチス支配に対抗し、クーデターを試みました。結果は失敗におわり、この事件に関わったとされる多くの人が処刑されました（画像）。そしてその中には、外務省の職員も13名いました。」】
（※ ある方が先生を批判したリポストを先生もリポストするという形で提示されました。
「ヒトラー」とは誰のことしょうか？ 「軍の一部の将校ら」は誰を指しているでしょうか？）
（続きです）
【＞「ドイツ外務省内には、この事件やそのほかの形でナイツ支配に対抗し処刑された外務省員と、これまで殉職した職員の名前を記し、追悼した壁があります。彼らは勇気と責任感を持つ模範であり、今日まで、そしてこれからの職務の指針となるべく、その壁はあえて建物内の職員の目につく場所にあります。】
（※【対抗し処刑された】【名前を記し、追悼した壁】。私は集団ストーカーのかたに公開された「個人情報」群のurlを把握できていません）
〇
私の注意書きです。
【(時系列順に。アカウント名、およびアイコンをマスクするかどうかの基準は、騒動の存在を知っているかで分けています。おおよそのこちらの判断です）】
【内田先生のリツイート
（政権が報道番組に圧力をかけたのかで国会が紛糾しています。その件に関して）
＞ファシズムの亡霊が出てきたと当時のことを鮮明に覚えている。放送法を捻じ曲げた暴論だったのにあれば部下の捏造だったと責任を弱き者に押し付ける。なんと言う卑劣さだろう！】
＞（※ 現在、私の騒動としばしばリンクして挙げられている件です。先生に向けられたポストです。）
〇
内田先生のリポストです。
引用リポスト内のメッセージ
”2世議員が本邦にこんなに拡大した主な原因のひとつは、代議士を「私たちの受益代行人」として持ち上げる人たちのポリティックな道徳心の低さだろう。そういった業界人は初めから「デモクラシーの理想原理」なんて一片の価値も発見していない。２世議員の方が統べることが容易。”
↑
リポストのメッセージ
【ルキノ・ヴィスコンティの『地獄に堕ちた勇者ども』は、ドイツの企業経営者一族が自分の利益のためにナチスを支持する過程を描いていました。それが国を亡ぼすことになるわけです。】
〇このテキストを欠いている最中のやり取りです。
【追記】ご質問
先ほど内田先生のアカウントを拝見しましたら、‟なぜ直接本人に問わないのか”というお言葉がありました。
お言葉に従いご質問させていただきたいと思います。かねてからお問いかけして、まだお答えいただいていないものをあらためてお問したいと思います。
※「超能力」アラートにおける回答としてこの『福田村事件』が提示されたとき、先生にご質問をしました。
”映画ですので様々な見方があると思うのですが、「人間は時に愚かなことをすることがあり、そういった負の歴史を映像として残すことで二度と悲劇を繰り返さないためのリマインダー」を大きなメッセージとして製作されたと見ることができると思います。先生のテキストにもその旨を窺うことができるのですが、なのになぜ悲劇を繰り返そうとするのですか”というご質問内容でした。
ご多忙中誠に恐れ入りますが、お答えいただきますよ何卒よろしくお願い致します。
↓
〇内田先生のメッセージです
【maturity の定義は難しいですよね。この語をどう定義するかでその人のmaturity の程度がわかるからです。】
↓
〇私からさらに同じご質問を致しました。
↓
〇本日の内田先生のご返答です
【この人の思想はたぶん若い人に共感されるんでしょうね。どうして共感されるのかについて考えたものが二本あるのでご紹介します。一つ目。http://blog.tatsuru.com/ご返答です。】
（※ 掲載が昨日の日付になっている記事です）
●『フリーライダーの効用』2024-03-11 lundi
〇内田先生のメッセージです
【もう一つ、もうちょっと長いもの。これは『街場の成熟論』に採録されました。http://blog.tatsuru.com/】
（※掲載の日付は一年前になっています。拙稿『内田樹先生と「あたらしいナチズム」』で取り上げさしていただきましたので、そちらをアップいたします）
（先生、おねがいですから先ほどからずっと嫌がらせやめていただけないでしょうか…集中できません）
●『パワークラシーの国で』
【全文はこちら http://blog.tatsuru.com/2023/02/22_1105.html】
若い経済学者が高齢社会対策として高齢者の「集団自決」を求めた発言がニューヨークタイムズに大きく報じられた。
【「権力者支配(powercracy）」「パワークラシー」は違う。権力者の正統性の根拠が「すでに権力を持っている」ということだからである。
「パワークラシー」の国では、権力者批判が許されない。権力者を批判できるのは、権力者だけだからである。
わが国が「パワークラシー」の国だと考えると、当今の権力者たちの異常な言動が理解できるはずである。彼らの非論理性や非倫理性は、別に何らかの政治目的の達成のために採択された非情な手段ではないのである。権力者であるために必要なのは、卓越した政治的見識を持つことでも、雄弁の才に恵まれていることでも、人心掌握に長けているからでもなく、「現に権力的にふるまっている」という既成事実だったのである。
だから、彼らは自分たちが「法の下の平等」から除外されていること、「非常識」という評言が自分たちには適用されないこと、他人に無用の屈辱感を与える権利があることを繰り返しアピールすることになる。
まことに困ったことに、「パワークラシー」の国では、権力者だけでなく、権力を持たない一般市民までがその影響を受けて、「権力者であるような顔つき」を競うようになる。】
↓
〇一昨日（2024年3月16日）
（上のブログのモチーフ、優生思想の案件【高齢者の「集団自決」】が国会で取り上げられました。その記事に対して）
〇内田先生のメッセージです
（国会で首相に優生思想の発言者について問うた記事に対して）
【政府もはっきり言えばいいのに。「成田氏の発言はやや言葉足りずではありますが政府の方針です。】に対して先生のメッセージです。ただし、早く死んで頂きたいのは生産性のない老人だけでありまして、生産性の高い方はむろん長生きする権利があるということでございます。」】
↓
〇さらに翌々日（２024年3月19日）
上記「高齢者の集団自決」を唱える経済学者のインタビュー記事に対して
↓
内田先生のメッセージです
【政府や自民党が「公言できない本音」を代弁する「パペット言論人」という職業があって、そこにはこれまでも相当なリソースが注ぎ込まれてきた。ただ自体が下るにつれて「政府の本音」の「公言できない度」が高まり、結果的に「暴言言論人」の需要も高まった、という展開だと思います。】
■最近のテキストから抜粋
●月刊日本インタビュー「ウクライナとパレスチナ」えええ
【ネタニヤフ首相はハマスを「新しいナチス」と呼び、演説では「私たちは光の民であり、彼らは闇の民だ」という善悪二元論的な理解を示しました。イスラエルの国防大臣は「私たちは人間のかたちをした獣(human animals）と戦っている」とまで言い切りました。イスラエルによれば、今回のハマスとの戦闘は、二つの国家がそれぞれの国益を守るために行う「ふつうの戦争」ではなく、人間が悪魔と闘っている「神話的な戦争」だということになります。それではイスラエルのガザ攻撃に歯止めが利かなくなって当然です。相手は人間じゃないんですから。】（※誤字修正）
（※「騒動で何が起こっているか」…内田先生からストーカーへの指示、扇動になっています）
（※【「新しいナチス」】【善悪二元論的な理解】【「私たちは人間のかたちをした獣(human animals）と戦っている」】【「ふつうの戦争」ではなく、人間が悪魔と闘っている「神話的な戦争」】【それではイスラエルのガザ攻撃に歯止めが利かなくなって当然です。相手は人間じゃないんですから。】
「ナチス」「善悪二元論」「獣」「ふつう」……どれもこの騒動で用いられてきたワードや記号を引用されています）
【この瞬間も殺され続けているガザの人たちの命を守るために一刻も早く停戦することが最優先される。「これは言葉の問題ではなく、時間の問題なのだ」というのは感染の拡大を前にして、この病気がペストかどうかをいつまでも論じている専門家たちに向けて『ペスト』の医師リウーが告げる言葉です。今のガザについても、同じことが言えると思います。】
（※”マイノリティーの時間を奪え”‟時間は死”‟長引かせろ”は内田先生の頻出のメッセージです。【『ペスト』】も騒動で用いられてきた記号です）
【ロシアも前近代のパラダイムに退行しつつあるように見えます。プーチンはウクライナの「非ナチ化」を掲げて侵攻しました。】
（※【前近代のパラダイムに退行】…内田先生の騒動に対する批評のひとつであり、指揮内容のひとつです。頻出されるものです。
【問題は和平協定そのものの合理性よりむしろ国民感情です。最も強く人を衝き動かすのは怒り、憎しみ、屈辱感といった「負の感情」です。】
（※ポピュリズムの説明であり、ナチスのプロパガンダでもありますが、内田先生の騒動に対する批評のひとつであり、指揮のひとつです。頻出されるものです）
【物語がエンターテインメントとして成立するためには、登場人物たちに「深み」がなくてはなりません。［…]『福田村事件』はそういう映画でした。私たちは死者たちについて物語ることを通じて「供養する」。それは死者たちに「善人」「悪人」というラベルを貼って、それで済ませるのではなく、一言では片づけられない人間の「深み」を物語るということです。】
（※【『福田村事件』】…別名「朝鮮人虐殺」。「朝鮮人が井戸に毒を撒いた」といったデマによって起こった歴史的なヘイトクライムです。「私から超能力で攻撃を受けている」を「デマ」だとご回答いただい際に出された2度出されたメッセージです。
【死者】とは誰の事でしょうか？ 【それは死者たちに「善人」「悪人」というラベルを貼って】。参照としては、上述の【善悪二元論】。「戦争こそ平和」「服従こそ自由」のダブルスピークを想起していただければ読み解きやすくなるかと思います。）
【現在、日韓関係は改善に向かっていますが、その背後にはこういう文化的な努力の積み重ねがあるからだと思います。どれだけ長い時間がかかったとしても、私たちは死者の鎮魂と生者の慰藉を通じて負の国民感情を鎮静させ、民族間の憎しみの連鎖という「呪い」を解かなければなりません。】
（※こちらは上述の内容と逆のことが書かれています。【死者の鎮魂】【憎しみの連鎖という「呪い」をとかなければなりません】。「服従こそ自由」。ダブルスピークを想起していただければと思います）
【今、イスラエルはパレスチナとの共存を拒んでいますが、イスラエルという近代国家ができたのは、そもそもヨーロッパがユダヤ人との共存を拒んだことが遠因です。問題の根源は「他者と共生すること」ができない人間の非寛容さです。それが近代反ユダヤ主義を生み、パレスチナ問題を生み、現在のガザでの虐殺を生み、さらには新たな反ユダヤ主義さえ生みだそうとしている。】
（※ ダブルスピーク。正逆を反転したことが書かれています。【問題の根源は「他者と共生すること」ができない人間の非寛容さです。それが近代反ユダヤ主義を生み、パレスチナ問題を生み、現在のガザでの虐殺を生み、さらには新たな反ユダヤ主義さえ生みだそうとしている】。 参照は、上述【新しいナチス】）
【答えは簡単と言えば簡単なのです。反ユダヤ主義とパレスチナ問題は同根の問題だからです。これを生み出したのはどちらも「他者との共生を拒む心」です。そのような弱い心情に人が屈する限り、同じ種類の問題は無限に再生産されます。「理解も共感も絶した他者とも共生し得るような人間になること」、それ以外の解決法はありません。】
（※ ダブルスピーク。正逆を反転したことが書かれています。【これを生み出したのはどちらも「他者との共生を拒む心」です。そのような弱い心情に人が屈する限り、同じ種類の問題は無限に再生産されます。「理解も共感も絶した他者とも共生し得るような人間になること」、それ以外の解決法はありません。】）
以上となります。
（内田先生、やめていただけないでしょうか）
後者のテキストに関しては、すこしわかりにくかったかもしれません。また、コンテクストに依拠する度合いの高い日本の言語、それの機械翻訳（私がするすると英訳できればいいのですが…）を考えると、「ほのめかし」の意味もダイレクトに伝わりにくいかもしれません。ですので、私が伝わりやすいように（注）を付けていきたい思います。日本で騒動を古くから知り、内田先生のメッセージを読んできたかたには、こちらはさほど難度は高くなく、しっかりとした間主観性があるものだと思います。どのメッセージも内田先生の騒動への指令としては頻出しているものです。また、一読して簡単に注目部分を傍線を引いて行ったのですが、新たに詳細に引き直していきたいと思います。
これでご理解の一助になりましたでしょうか。内田先生には、「ハラスメント」（内田先生曰く）を長年受けている身とはいえ、また、皆様に事件を周知する立場とは言え、「ほのめかし」を解説するというご無礼をどうかお許しいただいと存じます。
ここで、内田先生にご質問がございます。おそらく海外のかたがたがこのテキストを読んでもっとも混乱する箇所かと思いますので、ご教示いただければと思います。
【追記】
皆様のご反応に対して柔軟に対応できないのが悲しいのですが、初めて「新しいナチス」のご質問をした日、こちらの文章の解釈に対する内田先生のリアクションを再掲させてください。こちらも別のかたにも騒動文脈で妥当であることをご確認いただいたものです。
〇内田先生のメッセージです
【子どもの耳ってほんとにすごい。】【発音を忠実に再現してる】
↓
（『ウクライナとパレスチナ』→ご確認のメッセージ→その後のメッセージです。）
（先ほどこの人物名が出てきましたので加えておきます）
〇内田先生のメッセージです
リアルタイムでもご紹介しました。
【カミューサルトル論争についてかくつもりですが、うっかり「ハイデガーはどうしてナチスドイツと心中しなかったのか」について考えだしたら今月もまだ論争にたどりつけませんでした】
（※【ハイデガー】…ナチスに加担した哲学者。第二次大戦後、処罰を逃れたことでも有名）
■『内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ』より抜粋します。
●（続き）【その提案を飲んで「組織を守る」という選択をした時に、勝負は終わります。敗北するのは「仲間を守ることができない」という点で道徳的インテグリティを自分から手離した組織そのものだからです。「一罰百戒」が攻撃する個人は組織を瓦解させるための「レバレッジ」なんです。】
●【■■■さんと３時間懇談。面白かった！「ここだけの話」がたくさんあって、びっくりしたり、腹をかかえて笑ったり。でも、残念ながらこれは活字にはできないんですよね。日本は「もう生きる屍」という■■さんの診立てに「死の先へ抜け出すために死に急いでいる」という僕の仮説が絡み合いました。】
（※ 個々のメッセージの意味より、パターンを読み取っていただければありがたいと思います。）
内田先生は、大学の理事長やそのほか多数の組織で重要な役職に就かれ、教科書にもその文章が採用されるような日本を代表する知的エスタブリッシュメントだというのは、多くのかたがお認めになるところだと思います。もちろん私もその一人です。その特権的なお立場が示すように、日本を善導するコメントやテキストを残されています。そのような立場に立つかたがなぜ、世界や日本を表向きとは逆の方向（上述「瓦解」「死」「新しいナチス」「不寛容」「退行」「憎しみの連鎖」、私との応答でご確認いただいたのが「朝鮮人虐殺」の志向です）に導くような指導をされるのでしょうか？
お手数をおかけして恐縮ですが、ご教示いただけますよう何卒よろしくお願い申し上げます。
●『愛と幻想のファシズム』再読
【しかし、何よりも私が驚いたのは、メディアからは「ファシスト」と呼ばれ、アメリカを相手に戦いを挑む主人公鈴原冬二の思想が現代の「加速主義」そのものだからである。え
加速主義というのは、アメリカに発生したポスト資本主義を望見する思想で、シリコンバレーの若手ビジネスマンたちの間では支配的なイデオロギーとなっていると聞く。
資本主義はもう限界に来ている。しかし、人権擁護や政治的正しさや環境保護を言い立てる人々の干渉で、資本主義はいくぶんか「耐えやすい」ものになり、そのせいでむしろ延命している。それよりは一気に資本主義を終わらせる方がいい。そのためには社会福祉制度や保険制度を廃止し、医療も教育も商品化して金がない人間は受けられないようにする。そうやって、弱い個体を淘汰し、生き残ることができる強い人間たちだけでポスト資本主義の新しい世界を構築するという冷酷でハードな考え方である。
この思想を鈴原冬二はそのまま口にしている。
「大切なのは、人間があまりに動物から遠く離れてしまったということだけだ。人間は、ただの動物だ。(...)俺は、人間を動物へと戻す。」「幸福にならなければならないという妄想が奴隷達を苦しめている」だから、「日本を一度徹底的に破滅すればよい」と鈴原はつぶやく。
この破壊的なイデオローグに多数の日本国民が拍手喝采を送り、彼の支配を懇請するようになるというこの小説の展開に現代日本人はもうそれほど違和感を覚えないだろう。少なからぬ数の日本人たちはすでに「人権や政治的正しさ」を嘲り、弱い個体は野垂れ死にすればいいと揚言する政治家たちに拍手喝采を送っているからだ。彼らは自分たちのことを「生き残ることのできる強者」だと信じているのか、それとも絶望のあまり「死なばもろとも」と念じているのか、いずれであろうか。】
ご紹介は以上となります。
上記のテーマ「前近代のパラダイムへの後退」は、一番最初にさせていただいたご質問のなかで、その中心としてまとまっているかと存じます。
●複雑系と破壊のよろこび
【（政治やビジネスの世界と、社会的共通資本の間には、乗り越えてはならない厳然たる境界線がある。その常識をある時期から日本人は放棄してしまった。たぶんわずかな入力で長い間続いていた堅牢な制度が激変するのを見ると（自分がその被害者である場合でさえ）、ある種の全能感のようなものを感じるのだろう。 私は合気道の師の多田宏先生から「破壊することは、創造するときに要する力の１００分の１でできる」と教わった。だから、全能感を手早く求める者は必ず破壊に走る。先生の教えはそう続いた。
破壊することで得られる全能感に淫する人が今の世界にはあまりに多い。年頭に師の教えを改めて肝に銘じたい。 】
（※ 頻出テーマ。上記【共謀罪について、『権力者の全能感が見える』】など参照していただければと思います。）
（後から厳密に整理し直すかもしれませんが、アバウトに時系列順で）
●ウクライナ危機と「反抗」
（※ウクライナ侵攻のおける「【ウクライナ】＝私、【ロシア】＝先生」という絵図はよく使用されていました。）
ウクライナへのロシア軍の軍事侵攻が始まってから、いろいろな媒体から意見を求められた。
それが今回はまったく様相が違う。これまでとは違うことが起きているということを誰もが感じ取っているのである。
アルベール・カミュは『反抗的人間』という長大な哲学書の冒頭に、同じような出来事が続いても、ある時に「何かがこれまでと違う」と直感すると人間はそれまでにしたことのない行動をすることがあるという話を記している。主人の命令につねに唯々諾々と従ってきた奴隷が、ある日突然「この命令には従えない」と言い出すことがある。「今までは黙って従っていたが、さすがにこれには従えない」と言い出すのだ。
（※【アルベール・カミュ】【『反抗的人間』】は先生が頻出されるワードになります。だれでしょうか…）
これは今のウクライナとロシアの関係を言っているようにも読める。でも、ここでカミュが書いているのは、領域侵犯行為に対して、人が反抗を選ぶのは、単に「もう我慢ならない」という感情に衝き動かされているだけではないということである。これを受け入れてしまうと、自分ひとりでは弁済し切れないほどのものを失うと感じた時に人は反抗を選ぶ。それがカミュの考えであった。
自分ひとりが屈辱に耐え、苦痛を甘受すれば済むことについてなら人は必ずしも「反抗」を選ばない。「私一人が苦しめばそれで済む」と思えるのなら、権利侵害を受け入れることは心理的にはそれほど難しくない。私ならそうするかも知れない。だから、人が死を賭しても「反抗」を選ぶのは、ここで権利侵害を受け入れたら、それによって失われるのはその人ひとりの権利や自由ではなくなると感じるからである。
カミュはこう続けている。
「人が死ぬことを受け入れ、時に反抗のうちで死ぬのは、それが自分個人の運命を超える『善きもの』のためだと信じているからである。人が自分が護っている権利を否定するくらいならむしろ死ぬ方を選ぶのは、その権利を自分自身より上に位置づけているからである。人がある価値の名において行動するのは、漠然とではあっても、その価値を万人と共有していると感じているからである。」(Ibid., p.425)
そうだと私も思う。だから反抗的人間は孤独ではない。その反抗の戦いを通じて、潜在的には万人と結びついているからである。
でも、もしいまカミュが生きていたら、ウクライナで戦っている人たちやあるいはロシア国内で投獄のリスクを冒しながら「反戦」を叫んでいる人たちは必ずしも「愛国心」からそうしているのではないと言うだろうと思う。彼らはそれよりもっと上位の価値のために戦っているのだ、と。
愛国心のための行動と、それよりもっと上位の価値のための行動は、外見的にはよく似ている。ほとんど見分けがつかないほど似ることもある。
私たちは他国の人が愛国心を発露しているのを見せられても、ふつうは特段の感動を覚えない。「ああ、そうですか。そんなにお国がお好きなんですか。よかったですね」とにこやかにスルーするか「愚かな。空疎な幻想に取り憑かれてしまって」と冷ややかにスルーするか、どちらかである。
だから、いまウクライナやロシアで「反抗」の戦いをしている人たちの動機を「愛国心」だと私は解さない。それより「上位の価値」のために彼らは戦っているのだと思う。
私たちが反抗の戦いをしている人たちから目が離せないのは、彼らがその戦いを通じて、遠く離れた、顔も知らず名前も知らない私たちの権利をも同時に守ってくれていると感じるからである。だから、彼らを孤立させてはならないと思うのである。
たしかに不合理な話である。
でも、この反抗者たちが敗れたときに私たちが失うのは小麦やトウモロコシの輸入量とか天然ガスの供給量とかいうレベルのものではない。もっと本質的な何かが失われる。そのことを私たちはたぶん直感的にはわかっているのだと思う。
（※ 美しく引き込まれる理説ですね…そして、先生のロジックは一貫していて理解しやすいと思います。
（先ほどは、おそらく海外の皆様にはご非難を受けたかもしれません。失礼しました。昨日のこの文章が頭の中では鳴っていました。読んだものが影響として出てしまうことがあります。）
（日本と海外のかたでうけとりに大きなギャップがあることをお聞きしています。私もギャップを埋めるべくいろいろとつまずきつつ足搔いていますが、先方の報道メディアを通して主張するとことは、先生の前述の例に従えば、ロシアの報道でゼレンスキーが主張を唱えるということになるのかもしれません。
皆様には私が憎悪の対象となっているかもしれません。一方で当事者間、つまり先生と私の間では騒動の見方は一致していると言っていいでしょう。私は、先生がノイズなく綴る洞察にねじれた共感と信じがたい違和感を覚えてきました。もっとも客観的かつ包括的な見方のひとつであると。ですが、今の状況は、それ以外のかたが逆とも言えるビジョンを通して見ているというこです。私の言葉がことごとく通じなくなっていますというのは、そういうことなのかもしれません。「超能力」問題も同様にあるかもしれません。現実に暮らす当事者間はお互い納得づくで、あるいは抗議しながら、同じ理解を共有していますが、メディアでは別の情報が供給されていると見ることができるよう思います。先生の例をお借りすれば、ロシアとウクライナの国内では同じ歴史観でこの「侵略戦争」をとらえています。でもそれ以外の国々が「ウクライナがナチス」というコンセンサスで統一されているになっていると譬えられるかもしれません。
私はひとつのヒントになるのが、先生のテキストにある感覚は皆様の中にいつ存在したのか、という問いであるのかもと考える時があります。おそらく皆様がこの騒動に出会ったときに抱いた違和感と一致しているのではないかと、見えないながら想像します。人間の認識が簡単にゆがむのは私自身ネットでよく経験することです。自分の不出来を脇に置いて考えると、ゼレンスキーはどうすれば、ロシアの国営放送を通して皆様に主張を認めてもらえるのかと、考えると容易くはない話です。別の物語が存在して、それは他の誰でもない当事者が当事者を記し、当時を知る第三者のご確認をいただきながら進んでいるこの記録にある。それを知っていただきたいという気持ちでやっています。）
〇ご参照に
・『ABOUT IT』より
【セクハラは「相手が嫌がることをさせることで、自分の力を確認する」ことに醍醐味があるので、「こういう行動は、異性には苦痛ですよ」は無意味。受け手が苦痛だから、やり手は楽しいのだ。】
・『複雑系と破壊の喜び』より
【私は合気道の師の多田宏先生から「破壊することは、創造するときに要する力の１００分の１でできる」と教わった。だから、全能感を手早く求める者は必ず破壊に走る。先生の教えはそう続いた。
破壊することで得られる全能感に淫する人が今の世界にはあまりに多い。】
・本稿『ウクライナとパレスチナ』中の【新しいナチズム】
・『『愛と幻想のファシズム』中、【『弱い個体を淘汰し、生き残ることができる強い人間たちだけでポスト資本主義の新しい世界を構築するという冷酷でハードな考え方である。】
【この思想を鈴原冬二はそのまま口にしている。
「大切なのは、人間があまりに動物から遠く離れてしまったということだけだ。人間は、ただの動物だ。(...)俺は、人間を動物へと戻す。」「幸福にならなければならないという妄想が奴隷達を苦しめている」だから、「日本を一度徹底的に破滅すればよい」と鈴原はつぶやく。】）
〇この文章の更新後にご反応を確認できまた（第三者のかたとも意味の共有を拝見できました）ので、やり取りが成立した記録として掲載しておきたいと思います。
私【リアルタイムに近い形で記録を録らせていただきたいと思います】
↓
内田先生のリポスト内のメッセージ
【私、ネオナチとは知らなかったし
私、統一教会とは知らなかったし
そんな高市さんの セキュリティークリアランス】
（【統一教会】…与党との癒着を問題視されているカルト的新興宗教団体。この騒動の比喩としてよく使用されます。【高市さん】とはどなたでしょうか…）
（『新しいナチズム』というテーマからは離れますが、先に取り上げましたテーマ、「思想と実践」との関連でご紹介させていただたいと思います。のちに別のテキストに移すかもしれません。）
●危機の危機
『新潮４５』という雑誌が以前存在した。ある時期から極右的な論調に変わって、質の悪い記事を掲載するようになってそのうち廃刊になった。まだまともな雑誌だった頃にはよく長いものを書かせてくれた。
「危機いうのはね、あれは二〇世紀に入ってから、はやりだしたんよ」と言われて、「おおっ」と思いました。
ところが、このとき幸福論が哲学の主題であることを止めて、代わりに危機論が前景に迫り上がってきた。そのときに、「どうして危機論がその時期に流行りだしたのか」その歴史的理由を二人であれこれ考えました。
貨幣価値が長期にわたって安定していると、それ以外の時代には存在しえない階層が棲息可能になります。それは「高等遊民」という種族です。彼らが生き延びる条件が整うのです。
このランティエの消滅こそが1910年代の危機の実相ではないか。
そういう意味では、レーニンも、ムソリーニも、スターリンも、毛沢東も、２０世紀的な「大衆」の力に乗って出てきた政治家たちであるという点では「新興階層」の人々なのです。彼らはまさに旧時代の貴族たちをその「ノブレス・オブリージュ」のモラルごと蹴散らして登場してきたのです。
貨幣と軍事力、それがこれからは国際政治の力学を決定してゆくのだという新たな社会観の前に旧世界の貴族やランティエたちが膝を屈します。
これまで彼らが独占してきた芸術や学芸や政治や科学や冒険や快楽が、リアルな実力を背景にした新興階層に次々と奪われていく。その救いのない被侵略感と被略奪感がおそらく「危機」という言葉を基礎づけた生々しい身体実感ではないか。僕はそんなふうに想像するのです。
近代科学技術がもたらした大量殺戮というトラウマ体験、国民国家間の全面戦争を抑止してきた貴族たちの超国家的連帯の喪失、知的なイノベーションを担っていた階層の没落と貪欲な「大衆」の出現・・・これらの与件全体を俯瞰すると、たしかにこれがいちどきに現実化したのは「危機」と称するにふさわしい事況だったと言えそうです。
（※「戦争こそ平和」「束縛こそ自由」…ダブルスピークを念頭に入れていただければ）
爾来、このときに原型が作られた「危機」的状況は、様々に意匠を変えながらではありますが、ここ１００年の間、同一の構造を維持してきたように僕には見えます。ごくおおざっぱな言い方を許してもらえれば、この１００年間、思想のたたかいは、世界を単純な論理や図式で「正邪、理非、善悪」の二元論で割り切ることをめざす「敵をつくる思想」と、個人と集団の奉じる多様な価値の共生を受け入れる「敵をつくらない思想」が拮抗してきた過程として見ることができる。そう僕は思います。戦況は一貫して「二元論」的、対立的な思考とそれが分泌する他責的で攻撃的な語法が優勢で、「いろいろあっても、いいじゃないか」的な寛容の思考を壁に追い詰めつつあります。「敵をつくらない思想」は今や土俵際で「徳俵」に足の指をかけて、全身を弓なりにして必死に耐えているといった状態が続いてきています。
（※ご参照に
本稿『ウクライナとパレスチナ』
【「新しいナチス」】【善悪二元論的な理解】【「私たちは人間のかたちをした獣(human animals）と戦っている」】【「ふつうの戦争」ではなく、人間が悪魔と闘っている「神話的な戦争」】【それではイスラエルのガザ攻撃に歯止めが利かなくなって当然です。相手は人間じゃないんですから。】 ）
このような全体的趨勢の中で、メディアの語り口はほとんどつねに「正邪、理非、善悪」の二元論に寄り添ってきました。その定型的な語り口のせいで、たしかに一時的には、世界の見通しはよくなったように思えます。けれども、このクリアカットな思考は、「うまく説明できないもの」を嫌います。そのようなものは存在しないことにするか、存在するが観察や分析には値しないものとして、テーブルの上から掃き落としてしまう。それを繰り返しているうちに、世界の現象のうち「うまく説明できるもの」だけがテーブルの上に残り、「うまく説明できないもの」が足元にうずたかく堆積するようになった。たしかにテーブルの上を見る限り、話はたいへんすっきりしている。すっきりし過ぎるほどすっきりしている。でも、足元にはテーブルから叩き落とした不定形のものが、行き場を失って、粘ついた汚物のように堆積し、私たちの足に絡みついている。その不快が逆にますます「話をすっきりさせたい」という私たちの無謀な欲望を亢進させる。
（※ 【うまく説明できないもの】とはだれでしょうか…）
私たちの時代の病は、あらゆる領域で、「フラット化」志向というかたちで発現しています。政治の領域での「フラット化」はたいていの場合、「問題は非常に簡単である」というワーディングを枕詞にして語り出されます。ある制度なり、慣習なり、法律なり、集団なり、さらには個人が本態的に邪悪であったり、無能であったりするために、私たちの社会はこれほど不幸になっている、だから、「諸悪の根源」を特定し、それを摘抉するならば、すべての問題は一気に解決し、私たちの社会は「原初の清浄」を回復するであろう、と。
（※ご参照に
・本稿『ウクライナとパレスチナ』…【問題は和平協定そのものの合理性よりむしろ国民感情です。最も強く人を衝き動かすのは怒り、憎しみ、屈辱感といった「負の感情」です。】）
この政治的説話は大衆に対してつよい魅力を発揮しています。わが身の不幸を説明することに困難を覚えている人々にとって、「悪いのはあいつらだ」という有責者の名指しほどフラストレーションを緩和してくれるサービスはありません。現に、私たちの社会における政治的ヒーローたちは「『悪』に対する過剰な攻撃性」によって高いポピュラリティを獲得しています。「語り口が穏やかである」とか「考えが深い」とか「反対者に対して忍耐づよく説得を試みている」といったことを政治家の美質に数える習慣をメディアはほぼ完全に放棄しました。そのような文言を僕は久しくメディアで見聞したことがありません。メディアを徴する限り、今政治家に求められているのは、何よりも「スピード感」であり、「わかりやすさ」であり、「思い切りのよさ」のようです。
たしかに、そういう人たちはテーブルからてきぱきと「ゴミ」を掃き落とすことは得意でしょう。でも、「掃き落とされた人々」は（強制収容所に幽閉するか、粛清するかしない限り）、結果的には、その政治家の掲げる政策を失敗させるためにしか行動しません。
短期的なコスト削減策が、長期的には巨大な損害を生み出した実例を私たちは福島の原発事故で学習したばかりのはずなのに。
知性の深みや、ひろびろとした展望や、人間的器量の宏大さを感じさせてくれるような言説に触れる機会はますます減っています。僕はそれこそがこの時代の危機のもっとも危機的な徴候ではないかと思います。
「危機だ、危機だ」と警鐘を乱打することは少しもむずかしいことではありません。「危機はここにある」と名指すこともそれほどむずかしいことではありません。でも、「危機を回避するために、人々が知恵を出し合い、手持ちの資源を分かち合うための対話と相互支援の場をどうやって立ち上げるか」という実践的な問いに答えることはむずかしい。たいへんにむずかしい。そのような場を立ち上げるためには、何よりも他者に対する寛容と想像力が必要なのですが、まさに「寛容と想像力」の必要を訴える言葉がどこでも聞かれなくなったという当の事実が、つまり危機を回避するためのただ一つの道を人々が寄ってたかって塞いでいるという悲しむべき事実こそが、この社会の危機の実相なのだと僕には思われるのです。
（※〇ご参照に
・『維新と加速主義』
加速主義というのは（…）「民主主義」や「人権」や「政治的正しさ」のような時代遅れのイデオロギーがブレーキになって、資本主義の矛盾を隠蔽し、資本主義の終焉をむしろ遅らせている。そのブレーキを解除して、資本主義をその限界まで暴走させて、その死を早め、資本主義の「外」へ抜け出そうというのが加速主義である。
・本稿『ウクライナとパレスチナ』中の【新しいナチズム】
・『愛と幻想のファシズム』中、【『弱い個体を淘汰し、生き残ることができる強い人間たちだけでポスト資本主義の新しい世界を構築するという冷酷でハードな考え方である。】
【この思想を鈴原冬二はそのまま口にしている。
「大切なのは、人間があまりに動物から遠く離れてしまったということだけだ。人間は、ただの動物だ。(...)俺は、人間を動物へと戻す。」「幸福にならなければならないという妄想が奴隷達を苦しめている」だから、「日本を一度徹底的に破滅すればよい」と鈴原はつぶやく。】）
●現代における信仰と修業
(※「ナチズム」についても描かれますが、どちらかと言えば、「思想と実践」に重きを置いて選択させていただきました。)
私が研究していたのはエマニュエル・レヴィナスというフランスのユダヤ人哲学者である。リトアニアに生まれ、フランスとドイツで哲学を学び、ホロコーストを生き延び、タルムード解釈学を相伝され、その学知によって崩壊寸前だったフランスのユダヤ人共同体の精神的導師となった人物である。
（※ご参照に
・本稿『『愛と幻想のファシズム』再読』＞【『弱い個体を淘汰し、生き残ることができる強い人間たちだけでポスト資本主義の新しい世界を構築するという冷酷でハードな考え方である。】
【この思想を鈴原冬二はそのまま口にしている。
「大切なのは、人間があまりに動物から遠く離れてしまったということだけだ。人間は、ただの動物だ。(...)俺は、人間を動物へと戻す。」
「幸福にならなければならないという妄想が奴隷達を苦しめている」だから、「日本を一度徹底的に破滅すればよい」と鈴原はつぶやく。】）
『◆内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ◆』
＞『●ファシズム』内田先生のリポストです。
（こちらのリポストは、内田先生に対して挙がったファシズム批判、一連のものです。）
【ドイツの政府機関
「1944年の今日7月20日は、ヒトラーの暗殺未遂事件があった日。軍の一部の将校らがナチス支配に対抗し、クーデターを試みました。結果は失敗におわり、この事件に関わったとされる多くの人が処刑されました（画像）。そしてその中には、外務省の職員も13名いました。」】
（※「ヒトラー」とは誰のことしょうか？ 「軍の一部の将校ら」は誰を指しているでしょうか？））
私が研究したレヴィナスという人は先の大戦で応召したのち、捕虜となり、捕虜収容所に終戦まで収監された。戦争が終わってみると、リトアニアにいた親族のほとんどはアウシュヴィッツで殺されていた。帰化した第二の祖国フランスのユダヤ人共同体は崩壊寸前だった。
そういう人たちに向かってレヴィナスはこう語った。では訊くが、あなたがたはこれまでどんな神を信じてきたのか？ 善行をするものに報償を与え、悪行をするものには罰を下す「勧善懲悪の神」をか？ だとしたら、あなたがたが信じていたのは「幼児の神」である。
（※ご参照に
・本稿い『ウクライナとパレスチナ』
【二つの国家がそれぞれの国益を守るために行う「ふつうの戦争」ではなく、人間が悪魔と闘っている「神話的な戦争」だということになります。それではイスラエルのガザ攻撃に歯止めが利かなくなって当然です。相手は人間じゃないんですから。】
ホロコーストは人間が人間に対して犯した罪である。人間が人間に対して犯した罪の償いや癒やしは神がなすべき仕事ではない。神がその名にふさわしいものなら、必ずや「神の支援なしに地上に正義と慈愛の世界を打ち立てることのできる人間」を創造されたはずである。自力で世界を人間的なものに変えることができるだけ高い知性と徳性を備えた人間を創造されたはずである。
。
「秩序なき世界、すなわち善が勝利しえない世界における犠牲者の位置を受難と呼ぶ。この受難が、いかなるかたちであれ、救い主として顕現することを拒み、地上的不正の責任を一身に引き受けることのできる人間の完全なる成熟をこそ要求する神を開示するのである。」（同書）
レヴィナスはこの峻厳なロジックによって、戦後いったん崩れかけたフランスユダヤ人共同体を再建した。二十代の私はこのレヴィナスの複雑な弁神論につよく惹きつけられた。信仰を基礎づけるのは市民的成熟であるという言葉は私がそれまでどの宗教者からも聞いたことのない言葉だったからである。
最後に個人的なことを書く。レヴィナスの哲学と合気道修業の間に二十代の私が「同じもの」を感じたまま、その内在的連関を言葉にできなかったと書いたけれど、四十年も同じことを繰り返していると、さすがに少しはわかってきたことがある。
それはこのどちらもが人間の生身感覚の上に構築された体系だということである。
そして、なるほど私は成熟を遂げたのだという成熟のありありとした実感を最終的に担保するのは理知や概念ではなく、生身なのである。幼児のときには見えなかったものが見え、聞こえなかったものが聞こえ、判別できなかった香りや味がわかり、かつては感知できなかったものの接触や切迫がありありとわかること、それが成熟するということである。霊的成熟とは徹底的に身体的な、誤解を怖れずに言えば、生物学的な経験なのである。
レヴィナスは「生身を持つもの」にしか真の信仰を担うことはできないと教えたのである。２０世紀の戦争と粛清と強制収容所の痛ましい経験からレヴィナスが学んだのは、悪とは「スケール」のことだということであった。生身の人間の尺度を超えたスケールで「人間的な社会」や「人間的価値」を作り出すことはできない。それがわかったときに、レヴィナス哲学と武道の内在的な関連が私にも少しだけ腑に落ちたのである。
●『撤退論』まえがき
今回は「撤退について」という主題での寄稿依頼です。まずは編集の趣旨についてご説明致します。
というのも、国力が衰微し、手持ちの国民資源が目減りしてきている現在において「撤退」は喫緊の論件のはずであるにもかかわらず、多くの人々はこれを論じることを忌避しているように見えるからです。「撤退する日本はどうあるべきか」について衆知を集めて論じるという機運が高まっていない。
（※【撤退】とは何を意味しているでしょうか…）
僕が「撤退」と言っているのは、具体的には、この国力衰微の現実に適切に対応するということです。痩せて腹回りがへこんだらベルトのボタン穴を一つずらすとか、寒気がするので厚着するとか、そういう種類の、ごく非情緒的で、計量的な問題です。にもかかわらず、そのことが制度的に忌避されている。どうしてなんでしょう。
システムを補正し改良するということはシステムに瑕疵があったということを認めることからしか始まりません。でも、現在のわが国の為政者たちは「失政を絶対に認めないという」立場をこれまでかたくなに守り抜いてきました。そして、「誤りを決して認めない」という態度を取り続けることで長期政権を保ってきた。「決して失敗を認めないこと」が成功体験として記憶されている。だから、成功体験に固執する。
「撤退」をめぐる議論は、これまで採択されてきた政策の適否についての精密な点検なしには成り立ちません。どの政策がうまく行って、どの政策が失当だったか、それを吟味することなしには、議論は始まらない。でも、それは現在指導層を形成している人たちが「それだけは絶対にしたくない」ことなのです。
第二の理由はもう少し複雑です。それは為政者たち自身も「日本はこれからどんどん衰微してゆく」ということは客観的事実としては認めており、その原因も理解しており、それに対する対策もすでに講じているのだけれども、そのプロセスを国民に対して開示する気がないということです。
喫緊の政治的課題が「目減りしつつある国民的資源を誰にどう分配するか？」ということであることもわかっている。
ですから、当然にも自分たちなりの「撤退戦略」をすでに構想している。それくらいの知恵がなければ、政権は担当できません。でも、それについて公的な場面で話題にする気はない。というのは、それが国民資源のかなりアンフェアな分配をもたらす計画だからです。僕はそう思います。
彼ら指導層のこれまで思考と行動のパターンを考えると、それは新自由主義的な「選択と集中」をさらに徹底したところの「強者にすべての資源を集中し、弱者は見捨てる」というものになるのだろうと思います。それ以外の解のために知恵を絞るほどの倫理性を僕は日本の指導層に期待しておりません。
（※【強者】とは誰で、【敗者】とは誰でしょうか…）
でも、「強者が総取りする」という「撤退」戦略を、パンデミックとインフレと貧困で人々が苦しんでいる状況下で公開したら大多数の国民の怒りを買うことは間違いありません。さすがに大多数の有権者の怒りを買ったら政権の維持が難しい。だから、それについては腹に納めて、黙っている。
いかなる国民的議論も経ずに、政府部内では「撤退計画」はすでに起案され、着々と実施されている、僕はそう考えています。そして、ある日「ポイント・オブ・ノーリターン」を越えたところで、つまりもう政府主導の「撤退計画」以外の選択肢を採る可能性が失われた時点で、はじめて「日本は沈みつつありますが、生き延びる手立てはもうこれしかありません」という手の内を明かす。そういうシナリオができていると僕は考えています。それがどういう「シナリオ」であるかどうか、それは別稿で書きたいと思います。
（※ 誰に呼びかけているのでしょうか…）
「多様性と包摂」という看板だけは掲げていますけれども、今の日本人は人種・国籍・言語・宗教・生活文化を異にする「他者」たちと共生できるほどの市民的成熟には達していませんし、そもそもそのような市民的成熟が緊急に必要であるということについての国民的合意さえない。そんな国が人口減を移民で補うことができるはずがありません。
でも、今のままでしたら、「日本はこうやって撤退に失敗した」という「やってはいけない見本」を提示するということでしか世界の役に立たないということになりそうです。
（※ この記号に限らず、現在まで時折と言っていいと思いますが、先生が提出されているタイプのメッセージです。
「撤退」が何を意味するかは、騒動を知る方で理解されていない方はあまりいらっしゃられないのではないでしょうか。
本日も別の記号で提示されておりました。
リポスト【無限リンチ】
↑
内田樹先生のメッセージです
【「今日のところはこの辺にしといたるわ」というギャグがありますが、とても大切な言葉だと思います。市民的成熟とは「程度の違い」を判定できるということですから。】
大変僭越ですが、記録ですので事実を述べさせていただくと、今までは提出された後しばらくして、通常の動作にお戻りになられて現在に至るというのが私の認識になっています。
↓
〇翌日（2024年3月13日）の内田先生のリポストです。
ほぼリアルタイムに近い形で記録させていただきたいと思います。
【「ジャンプ40年史の旅（後編）の巻」でも逸話が語られていました 】
先生のお言葉を拝借しますと「私たちは人間のかたちをした獣(human animals）と戦っている」ということに、見えておりません私は遅まきながら昨日身をもって気づくことができました。日々更新される「個人情報」をごらんになっている方には、完全には少なくとも、ある程度は浸透されている感覚かもしれません。
一方で、おそらくこの体験は、集団ストーカー被害に遭われる多くのかたが覚えのあるものかと思われます
（私のリポストです。他の被害者のかたのポストを英訳させていただきました）
「みんなの命を守らなければいけない。やらなければやられる」というような伝達情報も拝見いたしました。これを見たとき、皆様としては「どっちもどっちなのだろうが、リスクの低いほうを選ぼう」という結論に落ち着くかたが多いのではないだろうかと想像します。
しかし、理論的には奇妙です。日本の認識では「撤退」という言葉のニュアンスが感覚としてピタリとはまります。「撤退論」は2年前から頻繁にメッセージされ、しかもリスクの質を考えると、リスクの高低は変わらないはずだからです。
こちらも他のかたにご紹介していただいた記事ですが、数日前、ローマ教皇がウクライナに「白旗」の進言をアナウンスするということがありました。その際のゼレンスキーの反論をご紹介させていただきたいと思います。
「2500キロも離れた場所で、生きたい人と滅ぼしたい人の間を事実上仲介するような場所ではない」
集団ストーカー被害者の心情もきっとこういうものではないかと思われます。）
●憲法空語論
今号は憲法特集ということなので、憲法についての私見を述べる。
「空語であるのが当然」であり、少し喧嘩腰で言えば「空語で何が悪い」ということである。
あらゆるタイプの「宣言」と同じく、憲法も空語である。ただし、それは「満たすべき空隙を可視化するための空語」、「指南力のある空語」、「現実を創出するための空語」である。
しかし、「人間は邪悪で愚鈍な度し難い生き物であって、これからも改善の見込みはない」というような言明は居酒屋のカウンターで酔余の勢いで口走るのは構わないが、公文書に書くべきことではない。というのは、いったんそのような人間観を公認してしまったら、これからあと、その社会の成員たちは「より善良で、より賢明な人間になる」という自己陶冶の動機を深く傷つけられるからである。
全成員が邪悪で愚鈍で嘘つきであるような社会でも「生きていける」ように制度設計することはたしかに現実的であるかも知れないけれど、その制度がよくできていればいるほど、その社会の成員たちが「善良で賢明で正直」になる可能性は減じる。
成員全員が邪悪で愚鈍で嘘つきであっても機能する社会があるとしたら、それは原理的には一つしかない。「神がすべてを統御する社会」である。神が万象を俯瞰し、成員の行動も内心もすみずみまでをも見通す社会なら、全員が邪悪で愚鈍で嘘つきであっても、社会は機能するだろう。でも人間は神ではない。
だとしたら、次善の策としては「神の代行者」を任じる権力者が全成員を「潜在的な罪人」とみなして、その一挙手一投足を監視する社会を創る他ない。自民党の改憲草案を読むと、彼らがまさにそう推論していることが分かる。
「人間はすべて邪悪で愚鈍で嘘つきであるから、全権を持つ権力者が全員を監視しなければならない」という彼らの国家観と「憲法と現実に齟齬がある時は現実に合わせて書き換えるべきだ」という憲法観はまったく同型的な思考の産物なのである。
（※【ご参考に】
・noteテキスト『疑問』より
（続き）【監視社会というのは政府が網羅的に市民を監視する社会ではなく、市民が市民を監視し、密告し、機会があれば暴力をふるう社会のことです。共謀罪はそういう社会を創り出すための装置です。人間の卑しさと弱さと欲心を「レバレッジ」にして国を支配する術においては安倍政権は確かに卓越しています。】
・共謀罪について、『権力者の全能感が見える』の文章。
「権力者が全能感を覚えるのは、不合理で、不適切なことをしても誰もそれを咎（とが）めない時である。だから歴史上の独裁者たちはまったく無意味な苦役をその臣民に強いることで、おのれの全能を確認しようとしたのである。」）
（毎回大変お手数をおかけして恐縮ですが、騒動を最初期からご存じで、内田先生のメッセージにも精通しているかたのジャッジを仰ぎたいと思います。頼りにしてしまって申し訳ございませんが、何卒よろしくお願い致します。）
●『複雑化の教育論』をめぐるロングインタビュー その２
フィリピンの人がこう言っていました。「英語が母語同様に使えることはたいへんpracticalであるが、母語では英語と同じ内容が話せないことはtragic である」と。これはほんとうにそうだと思います。タガログ語では、政治や経済や学術について十分に語ることができない。そのための語彙がない。そのためのレトリックや複雑な構文が洗練されていない。「言語の植民地化」というのは、そういうものだと思います。宗主国からすれば、現地住民の創発性の「芽を摘む」ことが植民地支配においては必要だったわけですから、母語を痩せ細るに任せて、宗主国の言語を学ばせた。それは日本が朝鮮や台湾でやったのと同じことです。母語を使わせず、宗主国の言語を使わせることで、彼らの「母語のアーカイブ」へのアクセスを妨害した。でも、「母語のアーカイブ」に深く沈潜することが、新しいアイディアの発生にはどうしても必要なのです。
（※ 私は、今も海外のかたと対話が禁じられていますので、「言葉が違う」「発語のルールがわからない」とうるさがられるほど繰り返していると思います。逆から見れば皆様からも同じで私が空気が読めなことを嘆かれているかもしれせん。そこは申し訳ありません。先生と対話を始めた当初は、国内でも同じで、よく「宗主国ー非植民地」の言語観に譬えてお話してきました。”抑圧や支配をされた側は、その立場にいる限り、自分の歴史を自分の言語で語ることができなくなる”といった内容です。）
↓
〇ご参考に
内田先生のメッセージです
（私が現在の劣勢に変化し始めた頃、状況が見えない私は、空気が物理的に読めず、「なぜ、人権や国際法といった西側諸国の普遍的な価値が侵害されても許されるのか、そのロジックを教えていただけないでしょうか」と周囲の皆様に聞いて回っていました。その際の内田先生からのご返答になります。
【市民が立ち上がって「緊急事態宣言を解除しろ」とデモをすれば、内閣は当然これを「社会秩序の混乱」と認定します。つまり「緊急事態の発令は不当だ」という民意の表示そのものが「緊急事態発令を正当化する」という悪魔のような仕掛けなんです。】）
↓
（本日、こちら更新内容に触れたメッセージがありましたので、内田先生からのご確認として提示しておきたいと思います）
〇内田先生のリポスト内、他のかたの話題に触れたメッセージ
【「ルールを守って講義をしましょう」「人に迷惑を掛けずに主張しましょう」というのは、結局支配階級の許す範囲でしかモノが言ええなくなってしまっているということでしかないんですが、そのヘゲモニーに自発的に従う人々が自身が賢いと勘違いしている構図ばかりが多くて鼻白みますわい】
【なんかイヤなのは規定されたルートのみ人の主張は認められる、ということを前提にしているからなんです。なんというかなあ、こういう清潔な閉塞感」みたいなのが蔓延していることに疑問を持たない飼いならされた感じが嫌というか】
↓
〇内田先生のメッセージ
【これって「ルールを変えたければまずはルールに従って、ルールを変えられるほど出世してからやれ」「システムを変えたければまずシステムに順応して、システムを変えられるほど出世してから変えろ」と同じで単なる現状肯定主義なんです。】
●選挙では誰に投票するのか？
私はどの候補者についても私の政治的意見との完全な一致を求めない。かなり違っていても構わない。「私が個人的に暮らしやすい社会を作ってくれるかどうか」を基準にして私は選挙に臨むことにしている。極端なことを言えば、権力者が「内田に発言機会を与えない」「著書を発禁にする」「投獄する」というような命令を下した時に身体を張って反対してくれそうな人であれば誰でもよい。
それでも、歴史を振り返ると、どういう政策が国を亡ぼすことになるのかはだいたいわかる。それは「わが国の本来の姿に戻る」ことをめざす政策である。わが国が「こんなありさま」になっているのは外部から異物が混入してきて社会を汚染したせいである。だから、その異物を検出し、排除すれば社会は「原初の清浄と活力」を回復するであろうというタイプの言説である。
このタイプの妄想を信じた人たちによってこれまでたくさんの人が殺され、多くの価値あるものが破壊された。いまウクライナでロシアがしていることも、新疆ウイグルや香港で中国がしていることも、この「あるべき国の姿」幻想に駆動されているのだと私は思う。だから、これがいずれ両国の「亡国」の遠因になると私は思う。今は中ロどちらの国民も権力者に圧倒的な支持を与えているけれども、国民ひとりひとりが「わが国はいかにあるべきか？」よりも「これがほんとうに私の暮らしたい社会なのか？」と自問する習慣があれば、今あるような国にはなっていないはずである。
（※ご参照に
・本稿『維新と加速主義』中、 加速主義というのは（…）「民主主義」や「人権」や「政治的正しさ」のような時代遅れのイデオロギーがブレーキになって、資本主義の矛盾を隠蔽し、資本主義の終焉をむしろ遅らせている。そのブレーキを解除して、資本主義をその限界まで暴走させて、その死を早め、資本主義の「外」へ抜け出そうというのが加速主義である。
・『愛と幻想のファシズム』中、【『弱い個体を淘汰し、生き残ることができる強い人間たちだけでポスト資本主義の新しい世界を構築するという冷酷でハードな考え方である。】
【「幸福にならなければならないという妄想が奴隷達を苦しめている」だから、「日本を一度徹底的に破滅すればよい」と鈴原はつぶやく。】）
だから私は「わが国の本然の姿はどうあるべきなのか」を論じない。そんなことを論じてもろくなことにはならないからである。それよりは「これがほんとうに私の暮らしたい社会なのか？」を問うようにしている。私は基本的人権が尊重され、市民的自由が守られる社会で暮らしたい。それだけである。国が貧しくてもいい、軍事的強国でなくてもいい。金があり、力があり、隣国から畏怖されているが、権力者におもねる以外に国民に生きる手立てがないような国では暮らしたくない。だから、「私が暮らしやすい社会」にしてくれそうな人なら誰でも私は応援する。
（※ご参照に
・本稿『パワークラシーの国で』より
だから、彼らは自分たちが「法の下の平等」から除外されていること、「非常識」という評言が自分たちには適用されないこと、他人に無用の屈辱感を与える権利があることを繰り返しアピールすることになる。）
●安倍元首相銃撃の報に接して
原稿を書き上げた直後に「安倍元首相が銃撃されて心肺停止」というニュースが飛び込んで来た。
いかなる政治的立場にある人間に対しても、その活動を妨害するために暴力を用いることは絶対に許されない。「絶対に許されない暴力」の犠牲になった安倍氏に対しては、立場を越えてすべての国民がその無事を祈っていると思う。私はほとんどすべての政治的イシューについて氏の掲げる政策に反対してきたけれども、今はただ彼の健康の回復と政界復帰を願っている。
（※暴力のお話です。現在まで続いています集団ストーキングの情勢が劇的に変わったのが、「超能力」であったようにお見受けしています。ターニングポイントはあそこだったと思います。メモ書きの件が、大変な騒ぎとなり、私も皆様を驚かせたことを謝罪し続けております。これがなかったら、皆様の集団ストーキングへの評価も少しはかわっていたかもしません。あれから一年以上経ちますが、転がるようにここにいます。でも、あの当時、「連続殺人犯」容疑など含め、雑然と騒ぎが高揚したように思いますが、皆様に書いてきたことは、自己防衛を除き、その通りに実行しているとお約束することができます。アラートは毎日継続されてはおりますし、「怖い表情」など状況証拠が上がっていると思いますが、それが大きく見えるのは、ストーカーの報道の世界観です。ストーカーも私の発言そのように言うかもしれません。皆様には恐怖や不信感、不快感、そしてなみなみならないリアリティーを与えているかもしれません。私ももっとうまくお伝えする方法が見つかるといいのですが、バイアスを退けるのは意識だと言います。「私であれ、ストーカーであれ、誰であれ、騙されたくない」という意識でもって、内田先生と私、当事者間に何が起こっているか、見ていただければ、それだけでものの見方も変わってっ来ると思います。（糸井さんとの間に起こっていることは、申し訳ありませんが、アラートのやり取りの通りです）。
「なぜ、頬がこけて言っているのかlol」「以前と顔が別人のように老けている」「骸骨」…と揶揄されてきました。私には皆様との約束がありましたし、正直snsの反応もどうなるかわからないという思いでずっと黙っていました。ある朝、いつものように痛みで目覚めて、鏡の中の自分を見て、命の危機を感じました。
今日を含め何か月も、「内田先生、しつこいですよ」、「雷」、「原発」、「暴力」、その他の表象などのメッセージ群を提出し続けていますが、そうなる前のことです。
変容する自分の姿と、先生の日々のメッセージと合わせた時に、端的に「殺される、これは」と恐怖を感じた時から、防衛を開始します。
もちろん、日常であれば、二人の関係性を顧みれば不躾なご質問ですが、こちらは命が奪われようとている、そういう関係に転じています。あるきっかけから、先生の出すアラートによって「私が先生を攻撃をしている」というご批判がヒートアップするなか、私は先生にお問いかけをします。「ご自分が攻撃しながら、なぜ私から攻撃を受けているとアラートを提示し続けるのでしょうか」とお尋ねします。
〇内田先生のメッセージです
【テロへの報復と称してガザで数週間で約6千人の子供を残忍に殺害した。】【自衛する権利がある！】）
（※【子供を残忍に殺害してした】のは誰に当たるでしょうか。翻って、【自衛する権利がある】のは誰でしょう？）
そのあと、痛みに耐えている私は「やめていただけないでしょうか」とお願いします。先生が返されます。
↓
〇内田先生のメッセージです。
【たぶん６車線（３＋３）だと思います。】
（※ 車線の痕跡が跡形もなく消えてしまった道路の写真です）
それ以来、半年以上、毎朝私は目覚めてすぐ、「原発」の記号を出すのが日々の習慣になっています。そして、毎日１０度以上、20度はいかないぐらいでしょうか、かなりの数に上るメッセージを出しています。
【先生の周囲のかた、おとめになっていただけませんでしょうか
今日はひどいのですが、一時ソース上で何かあったのでしょうか…】
【先生、一日中なぜやめられないのでしょうか…】
【先生、お願いします…どうしてもやめられない…なぜでしょうか…】
・・・
私は皆様のリアクションをご確認することはきません。これは不気味なのでしょうか、それともとくに気を払うようなものでもないのでしょうか…。事件が起こった時、当事者に対して「悪魔化」はメディアでは一般に必須のプロセスといえるかもしれません、「人以外」「悪魔」までいってますので表象的には最終形態まで行ってるのではないでしょうか。
多方、不思議に思っているのは、現実はこの構図とは逆で、いつしかこのプロパガンダとは転倒した状況が生まれています。私としては、自分のとれる数少ない対策として皆様に訴え続けているのですが、皆様には「暴力」の問題は、どのような受け止めになっているのでしょうか…こちらの注意書きはしばらくして、記録からは削除するかもしれません）
（※先生、きついのでやめていただけないでしょうか…）
（表現がキツイというご批判をいただいているとお受けしています。皆様の意見を見て、時宜を見計らって、細部を調整できたらどれほどスムーズに作業が進むのだろうか、と思います。しかし残念なことですが、軟禁されたまま欠席裁判となっています。空気が読めず（不器用＆物理的に）、ふさわしい話法の照合が取れないまま書いていますので、法廷の文脈を外しておりましたら何卒お許しいただきたいと思います。私もある程度の無理をしてでも努力してまいります）
（昨日削除したパートに関して、復活のお声を届けていただいたと思います。こちらにも感謝申し上げます。補足の注意書きとしては、異様な長さになっていて読みにくさも相当でしょうが、お言葉に甘えて昨日のパートを復活させたいと思います。
人間は主語を認識することが困難だと言います。記述の対象自体が残酷な場合、対象の加害者でなく、周知している被害者が皮肉にも炎上していしまうという事例を見るのはこれまで往々にありました。また、周知とは、攻撃を意味するものではなく、ただ事実をお知らせする行為です。私も書くことに意識が振り切られてご配慮が行き届かなくなるかもしれませんが、主客の転倒の可能性についてどうかご検討のほどよろしくお願い致します）
・騒動も長引くについて、インターネットでは問題も拡大され、子細に枝分かれしていくのは避けられないでしょう。炎上も集団ストーキングも多層的なレイヤーにおいて行われます。そういったとき、問題をその起源までさかのぼり、見極めるというという思考法があります。上辺の理解や扇情的な反応ではなく、問題を考えるうえで動機を目的を「騙されないため」の方法です。
拙稿『ABOUT IT』では、繰り返されてきたメッセージである「セクシャルハラスメント」を最初に置かせていただきました。ですが、事象を接近して詳細に見た場合には、先生とは別のやり取りがその前にありましたので、ご紹介させていただければと思います。
・私は依頼されて、ある映画コメントを推敲して再アップします。これが始点となります。日付を調べましたらもう9年前の出来事です。それが「失敗」というご反応をいただきます。それは提出したものに対しての評価ですから仕方がありません。私も皆様のお役に立てず残念でした。
そこで不調法な表現を許していただきますと、そこから内田先生が連日、私についての誹謗中傷といって差し支えのないメッセージが開始されることになります。驚いて、こちらとしては素直に謝罪を繰り返すのですが、先生はいったん沈静化、しばらくして緩やかに復帰されるということが起こります。先生のご反応と騒動の扇動を見て、これ以上のやり取りは難しいのではないかと考え、私は映画コメントをネットから削除します。
〇その際の内田先生のメッセージになります。
【二度寝から悪夢で目覚めるなう。〇〇くんと対談してたらフロアにいた人が「ウチダの話は聞くな」と絶叫し始め、「あの・・・そういうことは自分で講演会でも開催して、そこで言っていただけませんか」とお願いするのだけれど無視されて、ついカッとなってひどいことをしてしまってじっと手を見る夢。】【日頃抑圧されている暴力性が夢の中でリリースされてしまうのかな。】
こちのメッセージをいただいた私は、映画コメントを再アップしますが、同様のプロセスが繰り返されることになりました。）
どれほど妥協の余地のない政治的対立であっても、その理非を決するのは「自由な言論」の審級であるべきで、それ以外の手段を私は受け容れない。そのことをもう一度繰り返しておきたい。
けれども、この数年、日本社会で政治を語る言葉は年を追って「自由な」というよりは「節度を失った」ものになってきていた。そのことはみんな感じていたと思う。
それでも、「暴力的な言葉」はただの「言葉」に過ぎない、言葉が人を深く傷つけることはない。そう信じていた人も多いと思う。でも、それは違う。
罵倒や嘘やプロパガンダが言論の場を領するようになると、「聞き届けられるべき言葉」と「消え去るべき言葉」を判定する力が言論の場にはあるという確信を人々は失い始める。自由な言論の場の審判力に対する信頼が失われた時に、物理的暴力の持つ現実変成力への期待が膨張する。言論への信認が失われる時に、物理的な力だけが決定力を持つという忌むべき思想が人々の心に入り込む。このふたつはゼロサムの関係にある。
（※ご参照に
・『内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ』【嘘】より
内田先生の引用リポストです
【「日本語が乱れた」】
↑
内田先生のメッセージです
【どれほど嘘に嘘を重ねても処罰されないということが「権力を持っている」ということであるというのが安倍政治の根本原理でした。ですから、政権は全力で彼女を守るはずです。「嘘をついたらペナルティがある」というルールを自民党政権は絶対に受け入れることができないからです。】（【安倍】とは誰でしょうか。）
政治的暴力を抑止するために必要なのは、警察や軍隊の強化ではない。十分な信頼に足るだけ、論理的で、感情豊かで、かつ節度ある自由な言論をもう一度作り直すことだ。その作業なら今すぐここから始めることができ
（※ご参照に
・本稿『ウクライナとパレスチナ』より
【問題は和平協定そのものの合理性よりむしろ国民感情です。最も強く人を衝き動かすのは怒り、憎しみ、屈辱感といった「負の感情」です。】）
・『内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ』【私への恫喝】より
【（引用rt内、”トランプが支持者に向かって遊説”という時事に対して）
↑
内田先生のメッセージ「『トランプは政府機関の彼に対する捜査を激しく罵り、彼が万一起訴された場合に起こる「死と破壊」（death and destruction)について、暗鬱な警告を発した。だそうです。」】
・これを書いた翌日、先生のメッセージになります。やり取りが成立したと見て、記録させていただきたいと思います。
【（※昨日、「暴力」をテーマに文章を更新しました）】
（※和製銃映画として有名な作品のティーザー動画。シンボリックな銃撃シーンが何度も繰り返されます）
●国葬について
（※周知させていただきます。以下のメッセージは先生が騒動を通しても頻繁に繰り返されてきたメッセージになると言っても過言ではないと思います。私も何度も皆様に意味を同じくするメッセージをお知らせしてきました。立場の差を考えれば、非常に不躾ではありますが、ここに来るまでに9年の歳月を騒動に費やし、私すべてを失ってきました。集団ストーキングは始まる以前の周知は、先生の名前も匿名で行われていました。ただ、感情の赴くまま記録しているわけではありません。その文脈をお含みおきいただければ幸いです。
周知は行為自体が個人攻撃のように映るかもしれませんし、誰の内容がひどいのか、人間は主語が識別できないと言います。ですが、社会的に大きな影響を持つ公人的なお立場に関する情報は、ニュースがそうであるように公益にもつながる意味を持っています。その特権的なお立場自体がここでもテーマになっております。何卒ご理解のほどよろしくお願い致します。）
国葬についてはいろいろな媒体に寄稿した。これは「赤旗」に求められたコメントだったが、没になった。岸田首相が「安倍元首相ほどの悪ではなかった」というあたりがお気に召さなかったようである。
まさか国葬への反対がこれほど高まるとは首相は予測していなかっただろう。法的根拠がなくても、国会の審議を経なくても、閣議決定で決めたことを国民は最終的には黙って受け入れる。安倍政権の８年間はまさにそれを証明してきた。岸田首相はその「成功体験」を真似ただけである。
安倍元首相のふるった強大な権力はある種のループ構造になっていた。どれほど国民が反対しても、野党が反対しても、合理的根拠がなくても、彼はやりたいことを強行した。すると、国民は「そんな無茶ができるのは、それを裏付けるだけの強大な権力を有しているからだ」と推論した。そして「それほど強大な権力者であるなら抵抗しても無駄だ」という諦めの境地に至った。つまり「あれほど権力的にふるまえるのは、ほんとうに権力を持っているからだ」という人々の思い込みが彼の権力基盤だったということである。よくできた仕組みだ。
（※【国葬】…集団ストーキングによる私の処刑に対してよく譬えらた記号です。 【安倍元首相】とは誰でしょうか…
〇【ご参考に】
・拙稿『ABOUT IT』より
騒動開始時、繰り返しご主張されていた内容のメッセージです。「セクシャルハラスメント」についてです。私の映画コメントのアカウント名は女性名（昔飼っていたペットの名前です）でした。
【その通りだと思います。権力は「他の人がしたら処罰されることをしても自分は処罰されない」ことで確証されるので、権力を持つ人は自分の地位を確認したくなると（不安になると）必ず「そういうこと」をするようになります。そして、ある日ついに処罰される日が来るまでそれを止められない。】
・本稿、共謀罪をめぐる先生のコメントです。この記事から6年前。
共謀罪について、『権力者の全能感が見える』の文章。
【権力者が全能感を覚えるのは、不合理で、不適切なことをしても誰もそれを咎（とが）めない時である。だから歴史上の独裁者たちはまったく無意味な苦役をその臣民に強いることで、おのれの全能を確認しようとしたのである。】）
●国葬という政治的失着
（上のテキストと同じ社会的事象がテーマになっています。）
なぜ岸田内閣は国民の信をこれほど急に失ったのか。「してはいけないことをした」というよりは「すべきことをしなかった」せいだと私は思っている。
法的根拠のない安倍元首相の国葬を国会の審議を経ず強行したことで一気に支持率は下がった。でも、国民はこのルール違反を咎めたわけではないと思う。政府の「ルール違反」はこの１０年もう日常化していたし、それは安倍時代には内閣支持率に影響しなかったからである。
安倍時代はそれで済んだ。選挙で勝てば「民意は得た」と居直って、個別的な事案については、どれほど国民の反対があっても無視することができた。国民の反対を無視しうるということそのものが磐石の権力基盤の上に政権が成立しているという事実を証し立てていると国民たちは信じ込まされたのである。「あれほど権力的にふるまうことができるのは、実際に権力があるからだ」と国民は合理的に推論して、権力者に抗うことを諦めた。
そのようにして、１０年にわたって、法律も憲法も無視し、国民の反対も無視することが「できた」のは、逆説的だけれども、安倍晋三という政治家に「他の総理大臣たちに卓越した力」があったと認めざるを得ない。
民意を得るための最良の方法は民意を得るためにまったく努力する様子を見せないことだというのが安倍政治の「教訓」であり、続く二代の政権はそれを愚直に踏襲して、短期間のうちに支持を失った。
（※【安倍】とはだれでしょうか…。
〇ご参照に
・本稿内『パワークラシーの国で』より
【「パワークラシー」は違う。権力者の正統性の根拠が「すでに権力を持っている」ということだからである。】
「【パワークラシー」の国では、権力者批判が許されない。】
【「パワークラシー」の社会では、「権力的にふるまうことができる」という事実そのものが「権力者であること」の正統性の根拠になるのである。なんと。】
【だから、彼らは自分たちが「法の下の平等」から除外されていること、「非常識」という評言が自分たちには適用されないこと、他人に無用の屈辱感を与える権利があることを繰り返しアピールすることになる。】）
●日本の研究力の低下
（※ここまで本稿でお取り扱ってきましたのは「騒動への言及」のテキストでした。先生がある言語レベルにおいて騒動について語っている文章をご紹介してまいりました。これは試験的な意味を込めて、ダブルスピークの表の意となるサンプルとして採録したいと思います。皆様のご反応によっては取り下げたいと考えています。騒動の立体的な理解につながることをめざしてアップしますので、ご検討のほどよろしくお願い致します。）
２０１５年に学校教育法が改定されて、大学教授会の権限が大きく殺がれた。大学は学長・理事長に権限が集中する「株式会社のような」トップダウン組織になった。それによって大学の組織運営は画期的に効率化するはずだった。たぶん「効率化」はしたのだろう。ひたすら人員を減らし、予算を削り、短期的に成功しそうな研究計画にだけ予算を配分する「選択と集中」が実現したのだから。だが、その結果がこの底の見えない研究力低下である。教育改革を主導してきた人々はこのみじめな結果をどう総括するのか。
というのは修辞的な疑問であって、私は答えを知っている。それは「改革が足りなかった」というものである。政府の政策は１００％正しかったのだが、頑迷固陋な現場の教職員がその実現に抵抗したせいで所期の成果が得られなかった。だから、さらにトップの権限を強化し、現場から自己裁量権を奪い取るべきだ。トップのアジェンダに忠実に従うイエスマンだけを重用し、反対する者は排除すれば、日本の研究力はV字回復する。そう信じている人たちが政策決定の要路にとどまる限り、日本の研究力低下と大学の非民主化は止まらないだろう。
（※ ご参考に
・本稿内『パワークラシーの国で』より
【「パワークラシー」は違う。権力者の正統性の根拠が「すでに権力を持っている」ということだからである。】
「【パワークラシー」の国では、権力者批判が許されない。】
【「パワークラシー」の社会では、「権力的にふるまうことができる」という事実そのものが「権力者であること」の正統性の根拠になるのである。なんと。】
【だから、彼らは自分たちが「法の下の平等」から除外されていること、「非常識」という評言が自分たちには適用されないこと、他人に無用の屈辱感を与える権利があることを繰り返しアピールすることになる。】）
・拙稿『◆内田樹先生と騒動との関係、近頃のメッセージ◆』『大学関係者への恫喝』より
内田先生のメッセージです
（政権が大学の学外委員に強力な権限を与えようとしているという記事に）【彼らが教育を管理したがるのは、たぶん株式会社が組織の理想だと信じているからでしょう。CEOが全権を握って、アジェンダに従う従業員たちを重用し、逆らう者は解雇するのが「世界標準」だと信じて、それを大学にも適用できると信じている。どうしてそんなに愚かでいられるのか分かりません。】
↓
同日の６時間後 【理事会だん。ほぼ全部人事でしたので、発言機会なく「並び大名」でした。さ、ムサコに帰ります。結局お昼ご飯食べる暇はありませんでした。お腹空いた。】
※ならびだいみょう【並び大名】 歌舞伎(かぶき)の殿中の場などで、大名に扮(ふん)して、ただ並んでいるだけの役者。転じて、ただその場に居るというだけで、何の役にも立たないこと。そういう人。 ーgoo辞書より
The Significance of Murakami Literature
（※I was troubled by the thought that publication of the article might be considered a breach of my discipline rather than that of a teacher to a world-class literary figure. I was on the fence for a day, but I wanted to let you know that this is a sample of one way to "mention a disturbance," a nuance, a formulaic example of it. However, depending on the response I receive, I may withdraw this one as well.）
No other contemporary Japanese author has been translated into so many foreign languages and gained the support of readers of different races, religions, and classes. Why has Murakami literature achieved such universality?
（※ This is a text from when mass stalking was beginning to spread abroad）
My hypothesis is that that this is because he continued to write about negotiating "things that do not exist. In the case of a work written about something that actually exists in front of us, we can be sure at first reading that the work does not assume us to be the reader. In the case of a work in which neither the jargon nor the meaningful gesture is comprehensible, we immediately close the book. However, even if the book is from a distant country or time period,a story in which characters encounter something that does not exist, in an impossible place, and are hurt, healed, or transformed into someone else, can have a certain universality. This is because people of all ages and countries are equally distant (in terms of the degree of their detachment) from "that which does not exist. Paradoxically, the reality of "what does not exist" transcends historical and geographical limitations.
（※Where is the "impossible place"...
Who is the "thing that does not exist"...?
Perhaps unlike the way I was perceived abroad, I am not a "person who exists" and this is the general way I am accepted. At least, I had assumed that this was the consistent perception on the part of the professor. For Mr. Itoi, it is the expression "dream animal.）
In Murakami literature, "unworldly things," things that cannot be measured by human knowledge, repeatedly invade our world. They abduct and leave loved ones and scar people in irrevocable ways. But I believe this is the realization of what people all over the world have experienced since the beginning of time.
"That which does not exist" comes at us physically, "in a way that is different from that which exists. How can we deal with it, how can we come to terms with it, when "that which is not supposed to be there" is actually and tangibly there? Humanity has passed on some useful empirical knowledge about such questions. We have learned to follow a routine, to be polite, to make do with what we have, to be restrained, to know that many of the world's problems are "matters of degree" rather than "matters of principle," etc. We have also learned that we can be "mature" by being "mature" and "mature" by being "mature" and "mature. Many of the things we consider to be indicators of "maturity" are included here. There are people scattered all over the world for whom the meaning of such practical knowledge is deeply felt. I believe that they form the readership of Murakami literature.
（※ I remember that when mass stalking began to spread around the world, many people in Japan were watching it very carefully. What still remains in my mind is that only Dr. Uchida's message was, "There is no way to take responsibility for such a thing. It was a time in Japan when the public's perception of the turmoil was different from today. He was the one who was involved in the incident, and yet he was calmly positioning himself to take responsibility for it.）
（先生、痛みと眠気で思考ができなくなります。お願いですのでおやめください）
●The Future of a Productive Society
（When we asked for a response, we received a comment that "the process of selecting and deleting the text in question seems unfair. We will follow your suggestion and provide a link to the full text for your reference.）
A young economist's proposal for "mass suicide of the elderly" as "the only clear solution" to the aging of the population has become a hot topic.
Using similar logic, Germany once attempted a "final solution to the Jewish problem. They started the Holocaust in the belief that the problem could be solved by eliminating the problem itself. However, no amount of killing Jews could improve Germany's national fortunes. Inevitably, he tried to explain why the problem could not be solved by expanding the concept of "Jews," saying that Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin were all running dogs of the world Jewish government. Nevertheless, the war situation only worsened further. In the end, the system died when some even claimed that there were Jewish agents at the center of the regime, leading its policies to failure.
But even if we were to systematically exclude "incompetent people" from society and create a system that does not allow them to have a voice or incur administrative costs, it would still not stop the decline of Japan's national fortunes. Next, those who loudly advocate the "elimination of incompetents" will claim that there are "hidden incompetents" among themselves, and that they are causing social stagnation.
But no matter how much resources are invested in uncovering and eliminating "harmful and ineffective members of society," it does not create value. A company that has "zero free riders" as its corporate motto, and all employees are working hard to find and eliminate those who are not working, will soon have zero sales.
●In the Land of Powerocracy
A young economist's call for "mass suicide" of the elderly as a measure against an aging society was widely reported in the New York Times.
(* This is the same theme as the above column)
He has gained hundreds of thousands of followers on Japanese social networking sites, mainly disgruntled young people who believe they are being undercut by the dominance of the elderly because of their extreme views," and was introduced as "one of the Japanese agitators who has gained an enthusiastic audience by gleefully breaking social taboos. He was "one of Japan's agitators who has gained a passionate audience by gleefully breaking social taboos.
(* From my article, ABOUT IT. The starting point of the teacher's disturbance, commenting on sexual harassment [Since power is confirmed by "doing things that others would be punished for doing, but you are not punished," people with power will always do "such things" when they want to confirm their own status (when they feel insecure)].
It is true that Japanese society is infested with "old people with power" who prevent young people from developing their careers.
It is true that Japanese society is infested with "old people with power" who are preventing young people from building their careers. They remain on the side of domination, deprivation, and disregard for their rights. Is it appropriate to call such a society "domination of the aged"?
Then, after thinking for a while about what to call it, the term "powercracy" came to my mind.
Of course such a political term does not exist (because I just came up with it).
(*"powercracy"... "Dr. Uchida and the Disturbance, Recent Messages" also introduced in relation to the Disturbance.
[This is the narrative of powercracy. Being in the current seat of power means all policies are correct."]
I have read that you have received criticism from people who know the context of the uproar, and that the current ruling party cannot be right and is being criticized.)
In general, whether it is a monarchy, an aristocracy, an oligarchy, or a democracy, the sovereign usually provides justification for its rights. They may say that they are "ordained by God" or "entrusted with the will of the people," or simply, "because they are wise." "Powerocracy" is different. It is because the basis of legitimacy of those in power is that they are "already in power".
In "powercracy" countries, criticism of those in power is not allowed. This is because only those in power can criticize those in power. The opposition parties that are in a relative minority in elections are not qualified to "criticize" the regime (they can only "rebel").
In the land of "powerocracy," those in power are in power not because they are politically preeminent, intellectually superior, or ethically flawless. It is because they already have power. This is "powerocracy. In a society of "powerocracy," the very fact that one can "act powerfully" is the basis of one's legitimacy to "be powerful. Oh my.
When you consider that our country is a "powerocracy," you will understand the extraordinary behavior of those in power today. Their illogic and unethics are not ruthless measures adopted to achieve some political goal. What was necessary for them to be powerful was not their superior political acumen, their gift of eloquence, or their mastery of public opinion, but the established fact that they were "actually acting powerfully.
Therefore, they would repeatedly demonstrate that they are excluded from "equality before the law," that the "insane" epithet does not apply to them, and that they have the right to needlessly humiliate others.
Quite troublingly, in "powerocracy" countries, not only those in power, but even ordinary citizens without power are affected by this and compete to "look like they are in power".
Apparently, lately, insane, arrogant.
These days, I've noticed an increase in the number of insane, arrogant, and aggressive people, but it's not that the Japanese character has deteriorated. When I realized this, it became clear to me.
(*Bold type has been added by me to the text, but I have also made use of those in the text. In many cases, as with "", they indicate a disturbance and a connection.)
●The Latest in China
The real voices of Chinese consumers do not easily reach Japan. Severe restrictions are placed on news gathering activities, and citizens are very tight-lipped. The government knows (or so citizens believe)where they went, who they met, and what they talked about. Even if they are not actually being monitored, as long as citizens are concerned that they may be being monitored, the "Panopticon (one view surveillance device)" will function effectively.
(* This is also from my article, ABOUT IT. [Michel Foucault, "The Birth of the Jail" Description This is the birth of the jail. This is the prison that was introduced to the world. It was used a lot in the early days of the upheaval. )
China has a social credit rating system. The government uses big data to rate the social credit (in layman's terms, "loyalty to the system") of all citizens.
Anti-establishment tendencies are retaliated against by the stress of things not going the way they want in daily life. I was actually skeptical as to whether such a demonic system really existed. But Mr. Saito simply said, "Yes, there is. People with low scores are not allowed to go abroad," he nodded.
Another thing I wanted to ask was whether the government was willing to develop a social welfare system for the tens of millions of elderly who are alone in the world, a consequence of the one-child policy.
Mr. Saito told us that the number of commentators in the Chinese media who speak positively of "euthanasia for the elderly" has been increasing recently. "If the elderly commit mass suicide, the problem will be solved" was not such an original idea.
(*Who does the "elderly who are alone in the world" refer to? Related to the above theme of [elderly people committing mass suicide]）
●Afterword to "A Theory of Freedom for You
Although I no longer teach regularly, I am still involved in several universities as a board member or visiting professor, so I have some idea of "what is happening" at universities. And as far as universities are concerned, there is little cause for optimism. I am not sure what to expect.
The causes of this problem are repeatedly discussed in this book. It is the result of "the desire to control and manage education and research centrally. I don't like to use such a strong word as "the root of all evil," but there is no doubt that the "desire to control and manage" is the main cause of the current devastation of school education.
(* "War is peace" and "bondage is freedom". If you are aware of the doublespeak)
This is because "creation" and "management" are incompatible in principle.
In Japanese society, career paths are open before those who want to "manage". They can rise to the upper echelons of the governing structure and get involved in policy making. But people who are passionate about "creation" are usually not interested in moving up within the system, so the circuit for creative people to get involved in policy making is virtually non-existent.
This is because people who love to manage begin every job by "checking hierarchy first. They first try to ascertain "who is the boss here," "who commands and who obeys," "who is allowed to use honorifics and who is allowed to use sass," "who is allowed to humiliate through abuse and reprimand." They cannot begin their work without first confirming this.
Therefore,in Japanese organizations, the first thing a boss does for his subordinates is not to "tell them what to do," but to "mount them. The first thing to do is to make the subordinate feel humiliated and remind them that they cannot disobey him, which takes precedence over all other tasks.
Do you think such a group can function efficiently?
Why are things not going well? When asked this question, they reflexively think "It's because we don't manage them well enough. "It's because we don't scold them enough" or "We don't humiliate them enough". Then, they further strengthen management, make the organization more supercilious, strict assessments, and harsh punishments for those who fail to produce results.
The "bad organization" in Japan today is much like this "army with too many viceroys and too few soldiers to fight. The same istrue of the school scene.
The conclusion to be drawn from this is, of course, to "further strengthen management and give as little decision-making and discretionary authority as possible to teachers in the field. That is how they tinkered with the system, cold-shouldering, assessing, and rating teachers, concentrating all power in the hands of the president and chancellor, and stripping the staff council and faculty council of their authority. In this way, "resistance from the front lines" was eliminated, and the education policy was supposed to succeed. But again, no results were achieved.
Once again, "management" and "creation" are incompatible.
Creation is a process with a unique blend of "randomness" and "choice". In layman's terms, it is a process that seems to be done "by chance" but is actually "guided by something".
I think my interest and Dr. Sako's interest is how to activate "creation" once again. We have both been thinking about this very seriously and have done a lot of "experiments".
From the point of view of those who "manage" us, both Dr. Sako and I are very unruly people. But this does not mean that we are just rebellious or anti-authority, but rather that we have a strong commitment to "creation. We hope you will understand this through this book.
● Talking to rural migrants in Korea.
In the midst of this headwind, activists seeking to revitalize rural areas have come as far as Japan in search of evidence for the historical inevitability and reasonableness of the way of life they have chosen, guided by intuition, to emigrate to the countryside.
But are not health care and education inherently systems for the weak?
Health care is for the sick and disabled, and education is for those who have not yet acquired the knowledge and skills to make a living. And government is also a system for the weak.
The powerful and the wealthy do not seek government services separately. They would rather have a "night watchman state" that does not interfere with their vigorous activities. They do not expect the government to do more than protect their rights and wealth from those who would interfere with their free activities.
American libertarians, and their more radicalized "neo-reactionaries," are now proudly so claiming. In their view, the welfare system must be abolished immediately because it is a transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor and a violation of property rights. In the extreme, they are right that "the powerful do not need meticulous government services.
Some may peel their eyes when I say that government is essentially for the weak.
(* [Libertarian]...see "The Monster Called XXX Libertarian" above. It is one of the key words of the uproar.)
Just as medicine begins by listening to the rescue signals of those seeking healing, and just as education begins by listening to the rescue signals of those seeking learning opportunities, government should begin by listening to the rescue signals of those seeking support from the community.
Isn't it wrong for the purpose of government that people living in underpopulated areas must give up government services because they are minorities?
(* [Rescue signal]...Who is currently sending the rescue signal?
(* Your criticisms have just been bridged to the information (thank you for your nightly patience). Thank you for your input and response. Perhaps it is here that "it doesn't read that way". I think there is also the impression of "exaggeration" coming from it. In previous instances, I think we have just provided supplementary explanations, and even more so, with the help of those who have long known the commotion, and I will endeavor to do so again this time.
Thank you for your patience.)
(That's a lot of text. Perhaps it is not too much to say that it is a feature of the site. It might be better to pack the editing more tightly. I am also experimenting as you see fit. I would like to end now as it is time for me to leave for the day.)
●The disease that haunts America ("Soft/Quiet" pamphlet)
Why is the abolition of racism so slow in the United States? Humans are often inhumane and cruel, but there is a difference in degree. There is a crucial difference between treating minorities in a store or restaurant in a discriminatory manner and killing them for being minorities. There must be a psychological barrier between attacking someone's character and destroying their body, which is very difficult for ordinary people to cross. In the first place, in a country governed by the rule of law, it would be an "unjustifiable" price to pay to spend the remainder of one's life as a felon behind bars.
But in America, that barrier is low. Very low. So, by some chance, people cross this barrier.
This film is about a person who is living a normal civilian life and commits murder on the spur of the moment, even though his sense of discrimination is somewhat excessive. This easy transition from the ordinary to the extraordinary forms the basis of the shock and horror that the film brings to the viewer.
(*[Ordinary people]... "Ordinary" and "common sense" were the arguments I often appealed to at one time, and are often used as key words to describe my arguments and commotion.
[Murder]...At this time, the teacher was in the midst of instigating the label of "murderer" against me, including the "death of the deceased.")
But what I fear is the discrimination and hatred of minorities that grows up in "normal people" who are not discriminated against by anyone and are not socially disadvantaged by their racial attributes. They are not suffering any concrete harm. Their sense of discrimination and hatred is illusory.
If prejudice has a realistic basis, it can be corrected by realistic policies. However, prejudice nourished by illusion cannot be corrected no matter how much we tamper with reality. That is what is so scary about this film.
Why does such an illusory sense of discrimination take root deep in the psyche of "ordinary people" in the United States? I would like to attempt a personal explanation for this.
America is a society that takes civil liberties very seriously.
America is a society that takes civil liberties very seriously, to the point of pathology. That is why equality is so strenuously avoided. This is because freedom and equality are, in principle, incompatible.
Equality cannot be achieved without public authority intervening in the lives of citizens and restricting some of their civil liberties.
But there are many people in America who will not allow that to happen. A surprisingly large number. They see "social justice" and "equality" as simply evil. Such things are merely "ideologies" created by the modern West. What is wrong with a hierarchy formed by innate differences and differences in ability? Nowadays, the United States is swarming with them.
(* [Libertarian] ... see "The Monster Called XXX Libertarian" above. Along with "accelerationism," it's one of the key words in the furor.)
(* How much can we speak in a nutshell...
[batarian] = [accelerationist] = (in this case) [American] = ...and who are we talking about?
But in a sense, it is only natural that such convinced racists would be found in large numbers in the United States. This is because "freedom trumps equality" is embedded in our national policy in the US. Not many people talk about that, so I will explain it for you.
To begin with, "achieving equality" is not stated as a goal of government in the U.S. Constitution.
The achievement of equality is neither the duty of government nor of citizens. All people are created equal, and therefore, no matter how much difference in strength, weakness, or wealth is created by the free competition that follows, it is their own responsibility.
And it is also a horror film with good audience service. It is a horror tale (telling a lesson known since time immemorial) that "people are scarier than monsters".
The film ends with a Friday the 13th-like scene in which a "supposedly dead thing" emerges from the lake water. "The return of the supposedly dead" is called revenant (ghost) in French. The "daughters'"hatred of minorities will never end and will repeatedly "reappear" as various manifestations after this. That is the ghost that haunts America. Will there ever come a day when America will be free of this ghost? Perhaps someday, but I suspect it will be a long time from now.
(※"Humans are scarier than monsters", "supposed to be dead", "ghosts"... who am I talking about)
●Restoration and Accelerationism
（(*[Accelerationism]...is one of the key words in the uproar, along with "accelerationism.")
At a lecture, I was asked to sum up 15 years of Osaka's Restoration politics. The current situation in Osaka City and Osaka Prefecture does not receive a high score in any of the areas of government, medical care, or education. However, the popularity of the Restoration Party in Osaka is overwhelming. Why do voters continue to support a party whose policies are not successful?
The civil servants will be reduced as much as possible. Cut administrative costs as much as you can. Free riders in the social welfare system will be wiped out. Create yes-men in school education who will follow the orders of their superiors. These are the latest political claims that overlap in some respects with what the American "accelerationists" have been advocating.
(Who is the [free rider]...?
Accelerationism is a hot idea that has emerged in 2010s America. Capitalism has already reached its endgame. Humanity must prepare for a "post-capitalist" era. However, outdated ideologies such as "democracy," "human rights," and "political correctness" act as brakes, concealing the contradictions of capitalism and rather delaying the end of capitalism. Accelerationism is an attempt to release that brake, to let capitalism run amok to its limits, to hasten its death, and to get out "outside" of capitalism.
This is an appropriate philosophy for an age in which people are becoming the majority who watch movies at double speed. I don't care whether the result is good or bad.
I understand the desire to see the result with my own eyes right now.
(*[People watching movies at double speed]...not double on my unauthorized access screen, but from watching movies at increased speed) .
In a society where accelerationist tendencies dominate, "speed" swamps everything, and those who fuel the euphoric mood are in the public eye. People are no longer interested in the after-the-fact verification of the results of policies so impatiently adopted. I can understand the impatience to know the future as soon as possible. But how can there be a bright future ahead for those who have lost the habit of looking back at the past and learning from their mistakes?
●What is a prosperous society?
(I would like to quote it in its entirety if I could, but it would be quite long and I hesitate to do so for the purpose of this paper. Therefore, we would like to ask you to visit our website at the link for the full text.
Finally, I am thinking of asking for a decision from someone who has known the commotion since the beginning and is familiar with Dr. Uchida's description. I am truly sorry that I have had to call on you so many times.)
I have lived a very long time, and never before has Japan's national strength declined so much.
It is truly curious, however, that there is no one in politics, government, or business who can paint such a calm picture of the future.
But it is curious to note that there is no one in politics, government, or academia who can paint such a serene future vision. All you will find are people whose eyes are bloodshot and who are looking for a "great game of death and rebirth. There are those who are eager to double the defense budget and make Japan "a nation capable of war at any time," and there are those who are preoccupied with the "calculation of the economic ripple effect of trillions of yen" by talking about the Olympics, the World Exposition, casinos, and the linear bullet train, and There are academics and commentators who fry, "Those who are not productive are not worth living.
And on the other side, there are the workers who go to work with a gloomy face, struggling with low wages, exhausted from bull-shit jobs, and mental breakdowns from harassment. Why are people so "poor" in a "supposedly rich country"? Let us consider this question.
(See previous title [Restoration and Accelerationism)
Thought about "poverty"...see below
・my article "ABOUT IT" https://note.com/xr448/n/n92c59ebc6c36
・"The Relationship between Dr. Uchida and the Disturbance, and Recent Messages," section on "Poverty Systems" in the""https://note.com/j_oot/n/nc09258af8bcb#6fae818d-599b-4946-a263-d6f74a45" target="_blank">https://note.com/j_oot/n/nc09258af8bcb#6fae818d-599b-4946-a263-d6f74a45ce1e)
There is a difference between poverty and "poor". I want to clarify that first.
Poverty is a cool and real economic condition. It has nothing directly to do with a state of mind. So, it is possible to be poor and still live a rich spiritual life.
But those carefree times ended unexpectedly.
But that carefree time came to an abrupt end. "Some people are taking too much for not working. "Some people take too much for not working. Resources should be distributed on a gradient based on social utility. The Japanese people became poorer and poorer as they reasoned this way. As far as I can recall, it was during this period that the phrases "strip public servants of their vested interests," "don't allow free riders on welfare," and "leave unproductive people alone" first appeared. I had never heard of them before.
A few years ago, an American magazine ran a feature article on the decline of Japanese universities. In the article, when faculty members and students were interviewed about what they thought of Japanese universities today, they used "trapped" (trapped), "suffocating" (suffocating), and "stuck" (stuck), all adjectives that describe physical suffering. These adjectives were used to describe physical suffering. I thought that this is probably a feeling shared by many people living in Japanese society today.
(* Correlation with my "surveillance" and "confinement" situation)
I'm sick of this poverty. I don't care if I'm poor. I want to live in a "non-poor society.
Then, what kind of society is not "poor"? At any rate, the "republican neighborhoods" I saw and heard about in post-war Japan were like that. They do not envy the wealth of others, they do not abandon the weak, they share their private wealth without retiring it, and they strive to make public goods as rich as possible. That is all there is to it. If adults actually behave in such a way, and if children think that this is ”normal”, then that society is not poor, even if it is ”materially poor”. I would like to live in such a society if I could.
(*"Usually"...a symbol that I used a lot for a while, and still use now and then, and was utilized by several people for gaslighting.)
This handmade "communism" is quite different in essence from the communism of the former Soviet Union and China. This is because these new "communists" do not force the wealthy and socially powerful to "give away their private property for the public good," but to "accept restrictions on private rights for the public good. They do not force the rich and powerful to "give private property for the public good and accept restrictions on private rights for the sake of the public good. It is not "you" or "they" who must first devote themselves to shaping the public. It is "I."
It is not "you" or "they," but "me.
Only from such a conviction can a prosperous society be born.
There are still few people who agree with me, but I am convinced of this.
(May 10, 2023, Medical Research No. 587)
(*"I（watash）"... "watashi" in Japanese is also used by many as a symbol to imply an association with me.)
●Who is the subject of the Constitution?
The words of the Declaration of Human Rights, "Mankind is born free and equal in rights," and the words of the Declaration of Independence, "All men are born equal, endowed by their Creator with unalienable Rights, including Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," are both empty words. " in the Declaration of Independence are both empty words. For there is no such reality in either France or the United States today.
There are those who say that the Constitution should be rewritten because it is out of touch with reality.
"So, what kind of world are they going to strive to build after enacting a constitution that is narrative to reality as it is? What will they do after they have made it their "national policy" to simply affirm the status quo and accept the status quo?
(Shinano Mainichi Shimbun, May 6, 2023)
（※【Please refer】
In "Dr. Uchida's Relationship with the Disturbance, and Recent Messages," [Surveillance, Isolation Orders].
https://note.com/j_oot/n/nc09258af8bcb
・[Directive to Monitor and Isolate] in "Dr. Uchida's Relationship with the Disturbance, and Recent Messages."
https://note.com/xr448/n/n92c59ebc6c36）
Commentary on the official "Monster" pamphlet
The subject who controls the monster
Every person has a "monster" inside him or her.
I learned this in the midst of the student movement about half a century ago. In those days, campuses were often "police-free". When there is no risk of criminal punishment for any outrageous behavior, some people cannot restrain themselves from violence. I had not known until then that there were more than a few of them.
(* [Monster]...who are we referring to here...)
A student who normally looks like a "normal person" suddenly changed his appearance and became extremely violent. When we passed each other on campus a short time later, he was walking briskly with a "normal face" as if he were a different person.
A lot of students were killed or seriously injured in those days by the same students. In many cases, the perpetrators were never caught. So many of the people who killed or inflicted lifelong wounds on others when they were young have since found jobs, become employed, and are probably pensioners by now. But none of their families or friends know about it.
I think the same thing must have happened during the last war. I believe that people who were normally gentle uncles or shy young men, when thrown into a situation where no matter what they did they would not be punished, changed into "the shape of a different person" and looted, torched, raped, and murdered. After they were demobilized, they would have returned to being the gentle uncles and shy young men they still were.
(* [No matter what you do, you will not be punished]...This is a message that is frequently used.
About sexual harassment, power is confirmed by the fact that "I will not be punished for doing something that others would be punished for doing". I know from experience.)
In other words, if my "monster" were an extension of my own personality, a radicalized form of common vices such as being violent, jealous, or a liar, we would probably try to stop it from running amok. The "monster" undoubtedly has its origins in "myself," and since that is the case, I have "manufacturer's responsibility" for it
Children have not yet formed a firm self-image of what t. This plasticity is the essence of "childishness,"but because of this, children cannot be aware that they are the origin of the "monster" when it is unleashed. It is "a stranger. Therefore, the "monster" unleashed by the child is scary.
(As I mentioned at the beginning and end of yesterday's work, I asked a person who has been following the turmoil from the beginning and is familiar with Dr. Uchida's message to check yesterday's text. He said, "OK. We are deeply grateful to him for his cooperation. We will continue to work with the same format and observation )
(We would like to end today by asking for a judge at the end of the work. I have been really rude many times. My apologies.)
●About Terrorism
（Gang stalking" is an act designated as terrorism in the United States and Europe. (The book "On Terrorism" is about the attack on the Prime Minister in Japan.)
(*The item [about gang stalking] from "The Relationship Between Dr. Tatsuru Uchida and the Riots, and Recent Messages"
Sensei Uchida's message.
>"Only the Kyokudo are capable of revolution in Japan," could have been the line).
The series of attacks has been criticized as "subversive acts of democracy" and "an outrage that shakes democracy. But these are also the words used to criticize the LDP government.
Uchida I think that criticism misunderstands cause and effect. It is not that when terrorism happens, democracy breaks down; when democracy breaks down, terrorism happens.
If the process by which minority opinions are realized, even partially, through democratic procedures is functioning properly, there will be no such thing as frequent violent actions against the government. As long as the process is in place for minority opinions to be taken up, vetted, and implemented, opponents will not try to destroy the democratic system of governance. They will only get involved in politics through voting, legitimate civic, labor and student movements.
In the past decade, the autocratic and public coalition governments have come to represent only the interests of their own support base and to give almost "zero response" to the demands of the rest of the people. Normally, when a government becomes authoritarian and oppressive, the public sentiment usually turns against it, but this has not happened in Japan. The more dictatorial the government became, the more the people atrophied and the more the minority group was crushed. I believe that this "success experience" has made the government grow.
(*[Dictatorship]...a word that appears frequently in this paper.
-Why has democracy ceased to function in Japan?
Uchida- It is because the Japanese rulers have become so entrenched in this "success experience" that they have forgotten the basic principles of democracy. The principle of democracy is to live with your enemies and rule with your opponents, as Ortega broke down. The ruler is called upon to act as a "public figure," representing all the people, including his opponents and political rivals.
Rather than that, he should give full power to the top, form a government only with those who agree with his agenda, and exclude all those who oppose him. Some people have come out to say that it is more "efficient" to have a system in which decisions made at the top are communicated down to the bottom without delay. They say, "That's how it works in the private sector."
But if we continue with politics that ignores the minority and the minority public is haunted by a sense of powerlessness that their political opinions are nowhere to be realized, democratic government will no longer hold. "We must listen to the minority" is not a pretty statement; it is political realism to maintain a democratic state.
(*[Minority]...[knocking off the weak] is a keyword that appears frequently in this paper.
- However, such fear and tension has been lost in Japan today.
Uchida The antagonism between the government and the people is deepening, but there is no fear of the people on the part of the government. Instead, they are consolidating their core support base by taking more and more arguments from those who support the government.
- What do you think the future holds for Japan if prewar history is not repeated?
Uchida: Currently, Japan's democracy is in the process of collapse. As long as nepotism continues, in which the government and its "cronies" use public power for private purposes and privatize public property, Japan will fall into backwardness.
(*About [nepotism]
It is one of the messages frequently mentioned in the riots.
Refer to
"The relationship between Dr. Uchida and the uproar, recent messages ◆[●Nepotism]
Of course, such a country will have its national power diminished and will drop out of the group of developed countries in the not-too-distant future and become a "dictatorship/nepotism" state, but those who enjoy vested interests "are But those who enjoy vested interests think, "That's okay. The wealth they have accumulated so far is enough to make enough money to cover their own pockets. )
(I am sorry, but if you know the starting point of today's work, the commotion, and if you have any doubts, it would be very helpful to hear from you. I apologize for the constant hassle, but your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.)
（時系列順になるように移動します）
●Series of questions from Dr. Park on "Generating Language."
(*This is not directly and strongly related to the "New Nazism" theme of this paper, but we decided that it is necessary for the reading of the material in this paper. We may possibly move it to another text later, or possibly delete it, but we would like to include it as a trial, so please consider it as well.)
(*Q)
There is a sociological discipline called ethnomethodology. This "ethnomethodology" was created by an American sociologist named Harold Garfinkel (1917-2011).
"Color Trouble" is a portrait of Jim Crow (black racism) in the American South in the 1940s. [...]A driver spots a young black couple moving into an empty seat just behind the white seats. The driver tells them to move to the back seat, citing Virginia's racial segregation law that blacks must be seated in order from the back. [...] (to the officer) Counter-argue, citing the Constitution's guarantee of equal rights, etc.
(*Who is the one who usually [dares to argue that the Constitution guarantees equal rights, etc.]...)
The policeman eventually gives up on arresting them. The driver offers to compromise by moving back one row. Alice accepts on the condition that he fixes her seat. The driver fixes the seat and just when it seems like the case is closed, Alice demands another apology from the driver. The driver gets angry and calls the police again. This time, the policeman immediately arrests them both. Alice falls unconscious and is dragged off the bus. The patrol wagon carrying them drives away, the bus is loaded with passengers, and the bus drives away again as if nothing had happened.
What I find remarkable about "Color Trouble" is that it is told by me, a sociology student on my way back to Chapel Hill (home of the University of North Carolina near Durham) from vacation. It is this "I" who narrates the incident encountered on the bus as a so-called "clash of perceptions". But this "I" looks at myself, the sociologist, with skeptical eyes.
And it is this sociologist who is uncomfortable with and distanced from himself as a sociologist.
(*"watashi(I)"...Japanese has multiple positional 1st person pronouns that correspond to "I" in English, and "watashi" is used by me and frequently as a hint.)
Garfinkel distanced himself as a sociologist because he was unable to describe the incidents he witnessed in the ready-made sociological language of the time. As a sociology student, the first word that came to Garfinkel's mind was "class." But what Garfinkel saw in the incident was actually not a "conflict of interest" but a "conflict of perception." Garfinkel did not yet have the sociological language at this point to describe the problem he would later call "the plurality of the world.
This is probably why the case was published in the form of a short story.
"Color Trouble" expresses the problem of the "plurality of the world" in literary form.
(*I was not sure if I should go through this because it is not Dr. Uchida's text. I do not see your response. Regarding plagiarism, secondary works, and references, I have been informed that I have also been mentioned as a counter, but I wonder how much value plagiarism and secondary works have now become within the stoker's coverage.... Since you seem to have raised the question, I will publish this information "for the time being" with a disclaimer. Plagiarism is deeply related to the theme of this text, so it is important in that sense. No citation was found. The bolded part is the duplicated part.
[Garfinkel distances himself as a sociologist because he is unable to express the incidents he witnessed in sociological terms. As a sociology student, the word that came to Garfinkel's mind was "class." But what Garfinkel saw in the incident was not a "conflict of interest" but a "conflict of perception. Garfinkel did not yet have the sociological language at this point to describe the problem he would later call "the plurality of the world. It is for this reason that the incident was published in the form of a short story. "Color Trouble" is because it expresses in literary form the problem of the "plurality of the world."]
In the Japanese original, only the end of the sentence is adjusted.
(From Hideo Hama's "The Original Landscape of Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel's Short Story "Color Trouble")
(*[plurality]...that each individual with his or her own individuality exists in plurality as a human being on equal terms despite his or her uniqueness. The plurality is the plurality that expresses the fact that individuals with unique individuality exist in plurality as human beings on an equal footing despite their uniqueness. (Borrowed from the ... blog)
Looking at the "words" that Professor Uchida has created so far, such as "Not being able to live alone is a part of art," "How to subdue evil," and "What determines whether democracy functions properly or not is not how well the system is designed, but rather the maturity of the people. When the number of 'decent adults' among the people falls below a certain line, democracy can easily become dysfunctional. I believe that you have selectively spoken only about "what no one else would say the same thing as Dr. Uchida if he did not speak" such as "This is the case with modern Japan" .
(* The theme of this paper is "Dr. Tatsuru Uchida and the 'New Nazism'" and I usually use democracy as the standpoint of my argument. And Dr. Uchida's argument on the same theme is described)
This brings me to my first question. I would like to know the process or mechanism of how the words you have created based on your own physical sensations take shape.
The second question is, as a scholar, I would be very grateful if you could tell us about any "academic knowledge" that you have created so far.
(* I'm excerpting, but I think it also conveys the purpose of the text at the level of hinting...)
(*A: Dr. Uchida)
Let me answer your first question. What I value most in writing is "honesty. I try not to process the ideas that come into my head, simplify them, or stylize them, but to output them "as is.
The "trap" of "known conventions" is everywhere. Of course, the "known formulas" are not "borrowed" because I came up with them myself. It is an "original" knowledge. However, they are "ready-made".
（*For reference, from "Plagiarism -Reposted version"
https ://note.com/xr448/n/n1e55d7316f45
English translation of "Plagiarism - Reposted version"
https://note.com/j_oot/n/n043ecb96f01f
〇This is Dr. Uchida's message:
"I have often said in fits and starts that the idea of copywriting is not a good idea, but that is just a repetition of the "other" thesis since Roland Barthes and Jacques Lacan that "when I am speaking, it is the [other] who is speaking in me" and "the I am merely repeating the "common sense of modern thought" thesis."
〇This is a message from Dr. Uchida:
"I do not consider my findings on any subject to be original (even this book is mostly received from my predecessors). So I don't (or rather, can't) say anything complicated like don't imitate or copyright is the bee's head.")
In such a way, gently running the "fresh, untouched, newborn idea" and making it run as long as possible becomes the top priority for the human being who writes.
Now, how to carry it out?
Now, how do we accomplish this?
To me, "honesty" is not about not lying to others, but about not lying to myself
That means that what I want to write about, or what I have been talking about as "ideas," includes the "style" of how I write about them.
This means that what I want to write or what I have been talking about as "ideas" includes the "style" in which I write. If it doesn't have a certain rhythm or phoneme, it doesn't feel like my own words. So I rewrote the whole thing.
I see, so this is what you mean by "honesty"? That's what I thought.
So "honesty" is not an external norm. It is something you impose on yourself. Only you can judge whether you are honest or not.
And if you stop being honest, I don't think you are qualified to call yourself a "writer" anymore.
So he probably thought that as long as the content was properly matched, "rhythm" or "phonetics" were just secondary, decorative things.
But for me, that's where the "life" of the text lies. An "idea" is not just a concept, but it is only possible with the myriad of linguistic resources that are mobi. Any
I still can't explain why that type of "honesty" is so vital to writing. Anyway, All I know is that if I stopped being honest, I probably wouldn't be able to write anything.
(* For reference, from "◆About Plagiarism 2◆"
https://note.com/j_oot/n/n 93922e552a4e
[This is in the context of "plagiarism" and "derivative works" where a (then) university professor, who is required to publish more rigorous references, translated and introduced foreign material in a commercial work and failed to include the reference. (Incidentally, your book contains many references, but no critical review of the original material covered.)
[No, it's fine to quote "without permission". The problem is that you are writing as if it were your own text without citing the source, and that is called plagiarism, not citation. ]
This was one of the messages that was directed at me at the time. I had read the original critique as a student, so I was puzzled as to how to respond to your reaction. But the plagiarism message was sent, and this went on for a long time]
(typo corrected))
●『Fukuda Village Incident』
(*"Fukuda village incident"...a key word used frequently by teachers in group stalking.
〇 ["Fukuda Village Incident"]...also known as the "Korean Massacre".
>The incident took place during the chaos of the 1923 Kanto Earthquake and Great Kanto Earthquake in Japan, when rumors circulated that "Koreans and communists poisoned wells" and "Koreans set fires", and government officials and vigilantes who believed these rumors massacred a large number of Koreans and communists.
From Wikipedia]
〇This message has been sent twice by the doctor in my correspondence so far.
This was after he sent me the message "You are under psychic attack from me". When I asked him about the relationship between himself and the symbols he had given me, he responded with the following text.
Dr.Uchida[I contributed an article on the "Fukuda Village Incident" to a medium called Business Insier. Please take a look.
(In response to the film "The Fukuda Village Incident")）
This film foregrounds a dark part of Japanese history: discrimination against Koreans and Buraku. There have been many documentaries and dramas on the same subject, but I am unaware of any that have been made as commercial films and have been commercially successful.
What kind of film is "this kind of film"? It is not simply a film that brings to light the dark side of one's own country's history. No matter how politically correct the intention, if it is simply a simple dualistic depiction of good and evil, it will not be a commercial success. To succeed as entertainment, all the characters must have depth and depth to them, not just be "symbols. There are no simple good guys in this world, nor are there simple bad guys. All the characters are complex beings who have their lowly and weak points, and on the other hand, they also have courage and good intentions.
(*Comments in this paper.
-[Prime Minister Netanyahu called Hamas the "new Nazis" and in his speech expressed a dualistic understanding of good and evil: "We are the people of light and they are the people of darkness."]
-[The "Fukuda Village Incident" was such a film. We "make offerings" through stories about the dead. That is not to label the dead as "good guys" or "bad guys" and be done with it, but to tell stories about the "depth" of human beings that cannot be summed up in a single word. ]
I had thought that there might have been some intervention by politicians or a campaign to prevent the screening of the film, but there was no such thing. In today's Japanese society, where revisionist historians who deny the facts depicted in this film are still at large, the fact that this film was successfully screened, was a commercial success, and received high praise as a film is significant. This fact is significant because it encourages those who will follow in its footsteps that it is now possible to continue making such films.
(*[historical revisionism]...I have pointed out to "my personal information" that it is a hoax on a daily basis, and often the criticism of "historical revisionism" appears in response to lies caught in the uproar.
Here is a message from the doctor himself [There is a movie called Denial about the Holocaust falsehoods. The film is a true story about how historical revisionism takes advantage of the fact that any delusional theory can appear to have a good scholarly basis as long as it is brought into a controversy concerning its correctness or incorrectness. Historical revisionism "wins if you bring it into both sides of the argument. ]
There have been repeated instances of discrimination, persecution, and exclusion of the itinerant people by the settled people. This is because, from the point of view of the permanent residents, the nomadic people are "foreign" to them. The "foreigner" is both an object of disgust and an object of intense desire. The peddlers sell their "foreignness" as a kind of commodity. In this sense, it is dangerous work.
(*Who is the "foreign body"...)
The story of Fukuda Village has a dramatic climax at the moment when the discomfort of the settled people toward the yugyo people exceeds a certain limit and turns into murderous intent. At that moment, four half-settled, half-amused people "step in between" and try to stop the tragedy.
The reason these four do so is not that they have a particularly strong sense of justice or that they have common sense.
They do so not because they are particularly righteous or sensible, but because they feel that the villagers' murderous intent toward the peddlers is potentially directed toward them as well. If we ignore this, the violence may eventually be directed at us. We are now the ones who are doing the killing. Because they are aware that although they are "floating" for the moment, at any moment and for any reason they may be recognized as "foreign" by the villagers and eliminated.
（※This is the analysis that teachers often talk about regarding targets.
[The reason "one punishment, one hundred commandments" is effective is because "it is impossible to predict who will be the next target. Therefore, "anyone can be a target. But there is one condition. That is that the person must be "easy for the organization to 'cut'."]）
Of the four, the boatman played by Masahiro Higashide stands out as the most "in-between. Although he is a resident of the village, he lives on the outskirts and is subtly kept away from the villagers. This is because he is a "sea person" whose workplace is on the river.
People of the sea, mountaineers, merchants, prostitutes, bakuchis, ascetics, priests, carpenters, and blacksmiths are, according to Yoshihiko Amino, "people without ties" to the world. They are people who do not "abide" by the order of the world.
So the boatman who makes the river his home and the peddler who makes the street his home are the same in that they are "unrelated" to each other.
It is not difficult to understand why the boatman exudes a peculiar sexual attraction when one knows that he is a "seafarer. It is not so much his personal attraction, but rather the "unusual" appearance that bridges "here" and "a place other than here," which is brought about by his occupation as a boatman. Therefore, when women desire a "place other than here," they are intensely attracted to this type of "man without a connection.
Mr. and Mrs. Sawada, who have returned from Korea, are intellectuals and know "the world outside, not here. Therefore, they "float" in the village in both dress and language. Shizuko chooses the boatman as her lover because he, too, is "a person without a connection" who cannot really take root "here.
The fact that the "unattractive" or "floating people" were often portrayed as beautiful men and women on the side of the "unattractive" or "floating people" and the side of the sedentary people as formatively ugly does not mean that this is the case in reality. It is a projection of the illusion that the sedentary people are not sexually attractive and that the yugong people "look" seductive. And it also stirs up the hatred of the sedentary people toward the idle people.
Young people may watch this film and think, "I would not take part in a massacre even if I were in such a situation," but I don't know. As a member of the generation that experienced the school conflicts of the 1960s and 1970s, I can testify that it was "common" for normally quiet students to suddenly engage in unprovoked violence.
In fact, students of different parties engaged in killing each other because of slight differences in political platforms that, from the outside, were indistinguishable. I learned then that there are people who can hit a person on the head with an iron pipe and crack his skull without much psychological resistance.
It is difficult to know how inhuman a certain person can become when placed in an environment where "no matter what you do, you will not be punished" in normal times. Therefore, I am still making personal efforts to avoid creating an "unpunished no matter what" situation as much as possible.
(*[No matter what you do, you will not be punished]...a message that has frequently caused uproar since the beginning.
Repost of your criticism of Dr. Uchida"It's sad, but I guess the old "the more you bully, the more the adults will do as they are told" method is effective in this country. "
↑
Dr. Uchida [No matter how unreasonable a politician is, the public will infer that "he must be doing so because he is powerful enough not to be punished for being unreasonable. So the rule of thumb that "the most effective way to get into a position of authority is to try to be overbearing" holds true. ]）
I believe that what we need is "emotional education" to curb our built-in potential for violence. When emotions are deep, rich, and complex, it will not happen that we are driven by "negative emotions" like anger, hatred, and humiliation, and that we lose control of our emotions. Not to say that it won't happen, but it will at least be less likely to happen.
In order to enrich our emotions, we "imaginatively put ourselves in the shoes of others. Stories are a device for this. Reading novels, watching movies and plays, and listening to rakugo are all activities that contribute to "emotional education. By imaginatively putting oneself on the side of the aggressor or the aggressor's side, one internalizes the devices for controlling violence. I believe that this film is also an excellent opportunity for such "emotional education.
（※Emotional Education] [Put yourself in someone else's shoes creatively]... For a while, empathy was often used as a message in response to disturbances, along with those I was documenting. The message was, "Put yourself in my feelings and taste the commotion.）
（※When this "Fukuda Village Incident" was presented as an answer in the "ESP" alert, I asked the professor a question.
"It is a movie, so there are many ways to look at it, but I think it can be seen as a reminder that people sometimes do stupid things, and by preserving such negative history on film, it can be seen as a reminder not to repeat the tragedy again" was the main message of the production. I think it is possible to see this as a major message.
The question was, "Why do you want to repeat the tragedy when you can see it in your text?
I don't think we have received an answer to this question yet.）
(I would like to conclude today's work. Thank you all for your patience.
Finally, I would like to ask for confirmation of today's work from someone who has known the commotion since the beginning and is familiar with your message.
We are very sorry for the trouble we have caused you every day, but we would appreciate your cooperation. I am truly sorry.)
(* ↑About the confirmation you refused at the end of the work
Yes, we received your confirmation for yesterday's work. We are grateful for your help every day. Thank you very much.)
●"Democracy of the Ishin."
(*[Ishin]...is a political party in Japan.
A magazine asked me an interview, "Why is the Restoration so well supported in Osaka? I have been asked the same question repeatedly for more than 10 years. Each time I am at a loss for an answer. The reason is that the Restoration Party has continued to lose its way in local government and has never stopped scandals involving party members, yet it still wins elections handily.
All of the measures taken will result in the deterioration of administrative services for the citizens of Osaka.
All of these measures will result in the deterioration of administrative services for the citizens of Osaka. Why is this?
Alexis de Tocqueville, in his "Democracy in America," wrote an ineffectual characterization of President Andrew Jackson: "His character is coarse, his ability moderate, and nothing in his whole career proves that he has the qualities necessary to govern a free people. His entire career is devoid of any evidence of the qualities necessary to govern a free people.
However, Americans twice elected him president.
"The people often make the wrong choice in whom they entrust their power," Tocqueville wrote. But that's okay, he continues. What matters is that the interests of the rulers and the ruled are not in conflict. If the interests of the people conflict with those of the ruler, the ruler's virtues will be of little use, and his talents will be harmful."
It is safer to choose as rulers men who are about equal to the people in virtue and talent. They should not decree "what they believe to be right" against the will of their constituents. On the contrary, they will do what will please their constituents if they do it, even if they know that doing so will have poor results.
I think this is an excellent insight into the essence of populist politics.
The voters of Osaka are very "democratic" in the Tocqueville sense of the word.
It is "everybody does it" to be selfish, to lie, and to bully the weak. It is logically correct to say that "politicians who do what everyone else does" are the best representatives of the people.
What kind of society will this "democracy" in Osaka create in the future? I am watching with deep interest.
(*Who are the "rulers" and "representatives of the people"...
Refer to the text "Restoration and Accelerationism" which deals with the same party in this article.
[Outdated ideologies like "democracy," "human rights," and "political correctness" act as brakes, concealing capitalism's contradictions and rather delaying its demise. Accelerationism is an attempt to release that brake, to let capitalism run amok to its limits, to hasten its death, and to get out "outside" of capitalism. )
●2024-02-07 mercredi
Sweet as if they could hear your distress call."
A: This was a rather sincere question.
What should we do when the number of requests for help comes to those who listen for distress signals from others and exceeds their capacity?
This is exactly like my situation. Various people ask me for a little help.
Yes, there is more work to be done, but I still take it on because, somehow, I feel that I am becoming a little richer as I work.
I feel that when I give a "gift," I become a little richer. But the "wealth" that enriches me is not of the same kind as the gift. It is a completely different kind of wealth.
I believe that we all need a community of mutual support in order to survive. Without belonging to such a community, a person cannot survive as an individual.
The basic rule for the institutional design of such a community is "that the weakest person can be a member with self-respect.
Therefore, in such a community, there is no such thing as a "free rider" in concept.
A free rider is "a person who receives a share of the community's resources, but does not give anything of his own.
Many people think that it would be better if there were no free-riders.
I think that the majority of people believe that it is politically correct to "eradicate the free-riders" and bully "welfare recipients" and tell undocumented foreigners to "return to the country".
But I think this is plain wrong.
But I think this is plain wrong, because I believe that a community should be designed based on the "weakest individual," not the "standard individual. The institution should be designed so that even the weakest individual can live comfortably. This is because the community will be stronger that way.
Because the loss caused by free riders is negligible.
...and so Japan as a whole became poorer and academic productivity decreased dramatically.
The whole system was tilted by the free riders trying to recapture the little money they had earned. The Japanese society as a whole would have gained much greater "wealth" if the obligation to return scholarship money had been eliminated.
Then, it would be far more cost-effective to "create an environment where overachievers feel good about their work" rather than spending time bloodthirstily reforming the system to "reduce free-riders to zero".
The wisest thing to do is to design an organization where "all members feel good" by "smilingly welcoming free riders as full members of the organization and letting overachievers do as they please.
I don't know exactly what kind of distress signal you are getting, but being asked to help is a very "good thing".
I don't know what exactly the distress signal is that you received.
The "return" for the effort you made at that time will come back to you at another time in a totally unexpected way. You can trust the system of giving that much.
(*Who are the [free riders]...?
This is a frequent message in the uproar.
See
-"ABOUT IT"
(hinted by Dr. Uchida)
[Writing only about the phenomenon it caused, the information was spread in the community that "there is a 'welfare' among my friends." Of course, I am not acquainted with him
I receive criticism from many people."]
From then on, the teacher will submit symbols indicating "welfare," "homeless," "unemployed," "poverty," and so on. The teacher will submit symbols that indicate "welfare," "homeless," "unemployed," "poverty," etc. For those who do not share the context, it is a social welfare message."]
- This is Dr. Uchida's post mentioned earlier in this paper.
[Since the 2010s, "organizational management" has been about "creating a top-down organization," "heavily employing those who agree with the top agenda and eliminating those who object," and "finding and punishing those who are not working for their salaries and free-riders in the system."])
(* You will have a strange sleeping spell during this process. I think I was disturbed by this and that.
Now, the power is about to go out, so I would like to end there.
I am sorry to ask for your help again, but I would like to ask for the cooperation of someone who has known the commotion since its inception and is familiar with Dr. Uchida's message. If you have any doubts about today's work, we would be grateful if you could raise them with us. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Thank you all for your patience. We would be grateful for your support if you could. Thank you very much.)
(* The work for yesterday has been confirmed by a third party. Thank you very much for your patience every day.)
この記事が気に入ったらサポートをしてみませんか？