【Vol.276】Capitalism Hack Game from 20 : The "Business owner" and the "Employee"

What should "job creators" do? So here's the main issue. Today I would like to talk about the theme of "'job creators' and 'job created' people. There are two kinds of people in the world: "job creators" and "job creators," and I believe that there is no hierarchical relationship between the two. Without the "job creators," many of the "job creators" would not be able to make a living. Basically, I think it is a relationship of mutual support. I would like to talk about the weak points of each type of relationship and how to overcome them. But if there is one thing I can think of, it is that "people who can do everything on their own, without any particular organization, will stagnate or go downhill at a certain point after doing this and that on their own," as is common among influencers and freelancers. If you imagine a yatai ramen shop, it would be easier to understand. If you develop ramen by yourself, pull out a yatai and sell it, and it becomes a popular store, frankly speaking, you do not need to hire anyone for a while. Since I can do everything on my own, it would cost more to hire staff, so I make the decision that "I can do it on my own, so I will do it alone. Of course, when one is physically strong, one can go ahead with it, but one's physical strength will surely decline at some point. At that point, there is nothing you can do. The trouble is that the period of physical strength is unexpectedly long. If it starts to wither after six months or so, you think, "One-man play is a bad idea," but it lasts unexpectedly long, so you think you can keep going in this form forever. If you were to apply this to influencers and freelancers today, it is quite common for a person who was doing well as a one-man show to suddenly wither away at a certain point in time. There is also the issue of individual stamina, and in the case of influencers, the times choose the most active influencers of the next era, so there is a rapid turnover in the battle for the chair. That's one thing. So what should a 'job creator' do? In conclusion, I think "organization" is appropriate. Strictly speaking, it is "creating a sustainable organization while we can create work (while we have influence). What should we do about "those who do the work that is created? Next, I would like to talk about "people who do made work. Needless to say, the weakness of the "made worker" is that he/she is "passive. Naturally, when the times strip a person of his/her job, he/she loses it. For example, here comes Corona. A state of emergency was declared, and customers stopped coming to the store. A "job creator" would say, "Well, let's attack from this direction," even in such a situation, but a "job creator" would not have the same mindset. However, since they cannot say so, they try to create their own jobs, but since they do not usually live with the mindset of "creating jobs," they end up starting up businesses that are quite "guesswork," which leads to unnecessary losses, and the rest is a vicious cycle of "poverty makes you slow. I saw this really well with the Corona Disaster. People who live with the mindset of "creating jobs" always have their antennae up, thinking, "Oh, this could possibly become a job," and they always conduct detailed verification experiments. Then, they take data that says, "Oh, I thought this could be a job, but I didn't expect it to work," or "I didn't expect it to work, but I didn't expect it to work, but I didn't expect there to be demand for it. A project launched by a "made-for-work person" who doesn't do this on a regular basis is simply a mess. A common one is, "I came up with this business that doesn't exist in the world!" The one that says, "I'm not a good person. No, no, it's just that many people came up with the idea and set up the business, and then the world decided it wasn't needed, so it's not out there now. But people who don't usually have their antennae up to create jobs don't know that, so they think they've invented a genius. So what should a 'job creator' do? If a natural disaster happens, or if a global company invades, are we out of luck? This, the conclusion is that whether you are a 'made-worker' or not, you usually have to be aware of 'making work', "What makes a job?" I believe that we have to keep asking ourselves the question, "What is the best way to make a difference in the world? In this life cycle of "getting up in the morning, going to work, completing tasks, going home, and going to bed," I would like to insert a little work of "formulating a hypothesis, creating work, and testing it" into this cycle. When I do this, I learn that "most of the plans I come up with in my head are not correct. I think you will be horrified then. Ah. I was finally going to do this work after I lost my job. That's too risky!" He said. Even if you are a "made work" person, you should be aware of the importance of "making work". This is really a typical pattern of "I realized after I lost it" and "Oh, I should have done what you told me to do at that time~".