Should university written exams be conducted in languages other than Japanese (English or Chinese)?

Arguments for offering exams in English and Chinese:

• Increased diversity and talent: Attracting international students brings diverse perspectives and knowledge to the university, enriching the learning environment for everyone. It can also attract highly talented students who may not be fluent in Japanese.

• Enhanced global reputation: Offering exams in multiple languages signals openness to international students and can improve the university's global standing. This can attract partnerships, research opportunities, and funding.

• Economic benefits: International students contribute to the local economy through tuition fees, living expenses, and cultural exchange.

Arguments for prioritizing Japanese citizens:

• National university mission: As a national university, its primary responsibility may be seen as educating and serving the Japanese public.

• Language barrier and fairness: Offering exams in multiple languages might disadvantage students who are not fluent in those languages, potentially affecting fairness.

• Resource allocation: Implementing and administering exams in additional languages requires resources that could be directed elsewhere, such as supporting domestic students.

Additional considerations:

• Existing programs: The University of Tokyo already offers some exams in English for graduate programs. Expanding existing programs could be a compromise.

• Preparation time: Implementing such a change would require careful planning and preparation to ensure fairness and effectiveness.

• Public opinion: Gauging public and student opinion in Japan can inform the decision-making process.

Ultimately, the decision depends on the University of Tokyo's priorities and its vision for the future. Both sides present valid arguments, and a thoughtful evaluation of all factors is crucial.