見出し画像

Personal Essay6

In the ongoing debate surrounding English education, it is frequently argued that the traditional emphasis on grammar impedes students’ ability to develop fluency. While this perspective holds merit, it is an oversimplification to claim that grammatical instruction is inherently detrimental to language acquisition. A more nuanced approach, which recognises the value of both grammar and communicative competence, is essential for producing well-rounded English speakers.

To achieve fluency, a solid foundation in grammar and vocabulary is indispensable. These components serve as the basis upon which effective communication is built. Without an understanding of grammatical rules, learners may struggle to convey their thoughts clearly and accurately, resulting in potential misunderstandings. Indeed, fluency without grammatical knowledge is an illusion—language cannot function in the absence of structure. For this reason, it is misguided to suggest that grammar is a hindrance to fluency; rather, it is a necessary tool that enables meaningful and coherent communication.

That said, it is undeniable that Japan’s traditional approach to English education, particularly its focus on rote memorisation and translation, has limited students’ ability to engage in real-world communication. While recent reforms have introduced more interactive methods, such as task-based learning and oral practice, standardised exams remain overly reliant on grammar-translation techniques. This disconnect between the classroom and real-life use of English contributes to a gap between theoretical knowledge and practical fluency.

True proficiency in English is not simply a matter of speaking without hesitation; it involves mastering all four skills—reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Each of these skills supports the others. For instance, the ability to read and analyse complex texts enhances one’s capacity to express ideas in writing, which in turn bolsters one’s confidence in speaking. By fostering a holistic approach to English education, students can develop a more complete understanding of the language and its practical applications, from conducting academic research to participating in international discussions.

In conclusion, while there is a growing movement to modernise English education, we must avoid discarding traditional methods outright. Grammar remains a fundamental aspect of language learning, and its role should be integrated, not minimised, within a broader framework that includes communicative practice. Only through this balanced approach can we prepare learners for the diverse challenges of the globalised world, where both accuracy and fluency are indispensable.

この記事が気に入ったらサポートをしてみませんか?