マガジンのカバー画像

Written in English

67
I mainly use DeepL.
運営しているクリエイター

#philosophy

Some dissimilarities between Gendlin’s doctoral dissertation and “Experiencing…

Gendlin’s doctoral dissertation, “The Function of Experiencing in Symbolization” (Gen…

Neither arbitrary nor logical

Gendlin’s basic idea in “A Process Model” is as follows: I will attempt to illustrat…

A Preliminary Examination of the Concept of “Object”: From G. H. Mead to Gendl…

In the early 1980s, Gendlin began a preliminary examination of what an “object” is to …

Pragmatistic origins of Gendlin’s en#0: with reference to Dewey and Mead

In “A process model,” en#0 is mentioned less often than en#2 and en#3. Nevertheless, i…

Retroactive time: Bergson as a precursor of Gendlin

In both his psychotherapeutic and philosophical writings, Gendlin discussed a unique the…

Why is Gendlin’s philosophy less widely accepted in academic philosophy?

“Why is Gendlin’s philosophy less widely accepted in academic philosophy?” This ques…

Reviewing Prior Studies

It seems that people who are not part of the academic world do not realize how important it is to accurately review previous studies. Well, that was true for me before I was part of it. I would not have understood the importance of the firs

Chapter VII of “A Process Model” and G. H. Mead

In ‘VII-A: Symbolic Process’ in “A Process Model” (Gendlin, 2018), there was a detai…

Gendlin’s position against the “unit model” or the “content paradigm”: retr…

Gendlin’s idea that living processes cannot be predicted in advance leads to another im…

Collection of links: On “Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning” (Gendlin, 1…

Position of ECM in the writings of GendlinCatherine Torpey wrote about “Experiencing an…

Entitizing and Universalizing

Chapter V of “Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning (ECM)” (Gendlin, 1962/1997) con…

Two videos temporarily available from last year’s Gendlin Symposium

The following article appeared on the website of the International Focusing Institute on…

Collection of Links: Dilthey and Gendlin

I have written five blog posts about how Dilthey influenced Gendlin. Therefore, I have c…

Gendlin’s “focaling” and Dilthey’s “purposiveness”

In “A Process Model” (APM), Gendlin wrote that a living process is “different from both arbitrariness and logic” (Gendlin, 1997/2018, p. 47). One of the terms for not being arbitrary is “focaling,” while one of the terms for not being logic