What a Vtuber Pikamee's graduation means-political correctness fault

English is my second language, so please forgive me for writing errors.

I will try to explain what the identity of the oppression on Pikamee is derived from. Many Western gamers may know about it, but listeners in other parts of the world may not.
It all started in 2013, when a feminist released a video message saying that gamers are racist.
This triggered the furor known as GamerGate.
Gamers asked, "What the hell does that mean?!" and questioned the feminist, Anita Sarkeesian.
But Anita did not answer.
Instead, she continued to ridicule the gamers and claimed that she was being harassed by them.
She then determined that "the gamers are still Misogyny".

Gamers were labeled racist.
Not only that, they were also labeled alt-right.
Today, they are even equated with QAnon.
If she resists the kind of unreasonable attacks that Pikamee has been subjected to this time, she will be labeled as an alt-right person as soon as she does so.

The gamers called those who attack others with such labels social justice warriors (SJWs).

But consider this for a moment.
Anita Sarkeesian confirmed her legitimacy when she reported to the FBI that she had received death threats.
Isn't that strange?
The SJWs on Anita's side are now issuing death threats against Pikamee.
The SJWs do not criticize such a trend. Typical duplicity.

If the original author, Rowling, was really a racist, and we are condemned to play its derivative works, so far so good.
All we have to do is to refute the accusation.
It would be a fair state of affairs if such communication is allowed.
However, death threats for opposing their claims?
And when their side is treated in such a way, they denounce it as victimization?

One thing is clear: if left unchecked, the Vtuber culture will be taken over and destroyed by SJWs in the future.
Nor is this a story that will end with Pikamee's graduation alone.

The nonsensical demands for character representation in games ("Add ugly!" etc.) and
You know about Bridget's gender identity?
That was a sign that Japanese makers are starting to take a dim view of SJWs.
Their statements make no sense.
(The reasons are all stated on my twitter against the Japanese SJWs. Since it is not relevant to the main story, it is omitted here.)

Pikamee's streaming is a treasure.
It is proof that she lived.
It is proof of the bond between the listener and her.
What does it mean to seal it all up?
The fear of unreasonable claims.
The risk that SJWs will come and attack again.
There can be no other rational reason.
Pikamee herself may not have to fight.
I fear for her heart.
But if she continues to allow herself to be unreasonably overrun, how can she hope to recover from that emotional trauma in the end?
What should fans do?

At GamerGate, gamers united and resisted the unreasonable attacks from feminism.
Without them, the current situation would have been much more dire.
As a result, the resistance movement at the time spilled over to the periphery, culminating in a lawsuit against Gawker Media (the parent company of Kotaku and others).
Gawker Media was building a media hegemony with Anita Sarkeesian and other SJWs as its children.

Hulk Hogan filed a lawsuit against Gawker Media for defamation, which was supported by investor Peter Andreas Thiel.
Gawker Media lost the lawsuit and went bankrupt because it could not pay its costs.
In this way, the company managed to avoid being unilaterally pushed out by the SJWs.
To some extent, the harassment of Pikamee by the SJWs should also be able to be contained by a show-and-tell lawsuit.

I'd like you to consult a lawyer and have the server operator file an information disclosure request against the account that made the death threats and other harassment, identify the speaker, and file a lawsuit for obstruction of power, etc.
I believe legal fees can be covered by crowdfunding and donations.
It is not a large lawsuit like the one against Gawker Media, so you don't have to be a millionaire like Peter Andreas Thiel to shoulder the burden, and there will be people who will support you.

In order to enlist help, I would like Pikamee herself or someone who speaks English to report this to Breitbart News or other media outlets that are in conflict with SJWs.
That the Vtuber was harassed by SJWs.
And we would like Pikamee to be interviewed by those media outlets.

There are also other advantages to having the incident placed in the media for publicity.
Creators and artists attacked by feminists were supported by gamers and intellectuals.
If you do a search on the following two titles you will see examples.
"Feminism versus FACTS (RE Damsel in distress)"
"Do men need to check their privilege? | FACTUAL FEMINIST"

This is how many volunteers have refuted the unreasonable criticisms of feminists.
When they were treated unreasonably, there were people who helped them.
We will be able to get the cooperation of these people from people other than our regular listeners.
Simply continuing to put up with unreasonable things will not solve the problem.
I'd like to Pikamee should not be defeated.

What we can do as fans is not only to support litigation.There are other things we can do besides external defenses.We need to make it logically clear that Pikamee is not at fault.This is necessary.
If the fans can share the understanding that those who attacked them are simply unreasonable and unreasonable, then Pikamee herself will be able to relax.
A person who has done nothing wrong does not need to feel remorse.
It is important for the attacked person to be convinced of his or her righteousness.

I am poor and cannot help fund this, but I can do this.
So I have one thing to say about the discriminatory nature of the Hogwarts Legacy.
I would say that even if a work is clearly discriminatory, such as The Birth of a Nation, the consumption of it itself must be allowed.
Even if the consumption of a work is accompanied by an attitude that promotes discrimination, it should be criticized on a case-by-case basis, and the mouth should not be closed by forceful action.
There is a difference between pointing out that a work is discriminatory and saying that one should be aware of it, and insisting that one should not play or distribute the work.Only the former would be allowed in a decent civil society.
Only the former would be allowed in a decent civil society.
If there are ethically inappropriate expressions about something, they should be treated as an ethical issue and dealt with as a moral issue, and it is not only wrong but also illegal to try to force them on others by using force beyond words.
The original mission of feminism was to point out the discrimination that lurks within human beings by analyzing the distribution of such works. The behavior of SJWs is harmful to feminism.

In response to the incident, k-son said of the state of Vtubers: "It's a different world. It's a different world" and "It does not matter in our world."
That's true, but since the SJWs have crossed the border, that's no longer the end of the story.
Then we should cross the border too and strike back by spreading political statements by Vtubers toward reality.

To be clear, I predict that a Vtuber with as many subscribers as Picamilly could be an influencer on a political topic, and could be destroyed because there are few influencers on the other side to match her.
In fact, the SJWs don't really have the same kind of centripetal force with the masses that the Vtubers do.
All Pikamee needs to do is to spread the kind of stories I just described, and she will be able to maintain her legitimacy in this society.

At first glance, SJWs appear to be a dominant force in society. But their reality is different.
Christina Hoff Sommers' book "Who Stole Feminism?", which appeared in one of the videos mentioned earlier, explains the mechanisms by which they secure their influence.
According to this study, they have roots within the Establishment and control the Democratic Party, academia, and the media industry.

If Pikamee were to take a clear stand against SJWs, those in the West who continue to suffer from unreasonable SJW behavior would be more willing to support her, and the number of Picamilly registrants would increase.
The problem is that youtube is under the umbrella of google, which clearly has a pro-democrat stance...