Consideration of the relationship between Christian priests and communism in the safe zone as well.

2. I would like to talk about [the "terrible" acts written by Westerners in the safe zone].
On October 28, 1937, the Japanese surrendered Shanghai.
Thereafter, they marched in pursuit of the defeated Chinese troops toward the capital city of Nanjing.
At the beginning of December, Chiang Kai-shek declared that the capital would be moved and fled to Hankow.
With the exception of the Capital Defense Force, government officials follow suit and escape from Nanjing.
The only way for the civilians to escape is to flee north across the Yangtze River.
Then the Chinese army begins burning the surrounding area as well.
Ferry docks are crowded and ticket prices soar. In addition, Hsia Kwan is also disrupted by the burning of the area by the Chinese army.
Those who can't afford to pay for their tickets, or who missed out on buying them, return to the castle.
At that time, Westerners who stayed in Nanjing, mainly priests, made the settlement area a neutral zone and an evacuation zone.
They also consulted with Chinese officials. However, it is written in Rabe's diary that the defense forces were against it.
(They apparently intended to use the refugees as human shields.
The Japanese made their request to the Japanese via radio from a U.S. Navy warship that was also staying on the edge of the castle.
The Japanese did not recognize it as a legally neutral zone on the grounds that it was inside the castle.
However, the Japanese replied that they would respect it as much as possible.
It is certain that in the Japanese bombardment, a shell that deflected once fell near the safe zone, killing about 25 Chinese refugees.
That evacuation area, the Chinese military has issued [orders] for the evacuees to move. Contradictory to what a Chinese officer told Rabe, however, [the evacuation order] was also written by a New York Times reporter, F.TILLMAN DURDIN, in addition to Rabe.
The Japanese attack was launched from the south and east, so with a roar, it is believed that the people who remained in the southern part of the castle are also beginning to evacuate to the north.
There is an evacuation zone in the north.
Fallen on the 13th, the invasion for the Japanese occupation began.
Naturally, we are on the lookout for the defeated soldiers in the castle, and instead of bringing in the entire army, we bring in selected troops to conduct reconnaissance. I consider that action to be a common sense decision in battle.
This can be seen in the records of the Westerners.
Toshio Matsumura wrote more about it in his research paper (http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/85_S4.pdf).
At that time, there were five Western media personnel left in the country.
They stayed until the 15th, and after the 17th, they sent out scoop stories to their media by radio.
It was in that article that the story of [Massacre], like [Rabbit Hunt] by the Japanese military, first appeared.
This article was written by Miner Searle Bates (Chinese name: Bei Deshi , 贝德士), a missionary and university professor (history).
In Japan, it is called "Bates Memo".
Why did he talk about [Massacre] like [Rabbit Hunt], which no one is watching?
He is a personality. He wrote the following words
Quote"Religious faith is believing that good things are worth doing for their own sake even in a world that seems overpoweringly evil. I remain assured in hard experience that neither by national guns nor by national gods will mankind be saved, but only by the genuine regard for all members of the human family."
But why would a Christian priest, who should not be allowed to lie, make the Japanese military [evil]?
I see no problem with the Japanese army's combat and occupation actions until the 15th.
For a long time, I didn't understand why he turned [hostility] against the Japanese army.
The reason for this was triggered by the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the subsequent release of the "Venona Document" in the United States.
Before that, all the [information] about the American occupation policy was considered correct.
The Nanking Massacre was also advertised on NHK as "the truth" to the public, in which it was stated that 20,000 people were killed.
NHK is Japan's public broadcaster, but a governmental organization like a national broadcaster. At the time, it was the propaganda arm of the GHQ occupation forces.
As I wrote in a previous article, Japan has been repeatedly educated and manipulated by communism to believe that communism, let alone the Soviet Union, is right. If anything, the information has been disseminated through the media to give a bad impression of the U.S. stationing troops in the country.
However, even when a translation of John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr's VENONA by Professor Nakanishi Terumasa was sold in Japan in 1995, the media, let alone the university, continued to ignore it.
There were only a few professors doing research. Fewer researchers.
My goodness, it was only a few years ago that the public(me) found out about it.
This is from a research book by Ezaki Michio. Its claims became rapidly known on social networking sites.
The relationship between the U.S. and the Soviet Union from before 1937, and the relationship between communism and Christian groups is gradually being understood.
The United States at that time, led by American communists, called for a boycott of Japanese goods and a ban on their export through American Christian and charitable organizations, or without understanding the situation in China, and without taking sides with the fascist Chiang Kai-shek and the Chinese Communist Party.
Japanese diplomats at the time examined and reported to Japan. It is currently available on the website of the Japanese archives.
There is no doubt that Japan was an "enemy" in the consciousness of the Americans and Christians at the time of the Japanese invasion of Nanking.
In addition, Bates' friend George Ashmore Fitch was the one who sheltered a terrorist in his home for a month as he threw bombs and killed people, including civilians.
It was a bombing in Shanghai's Hongkou Park (now Lu Xun Park) on April 29, 1932, at the end of the First Shanghai Incident.
That He was an American Protestant missionary in China, YMCA.
And he is a executive of the Chinese branch of the YMCA.
In addition to that, in August 1938, an organization named "American Committee not to be complicit in the Japanese invasion of China" was established.
(I'm not sure if the official name is correct.)
H. Stimson as honorary president, along with Helen Keller and Philip Jafet T.A. Bisson as promoters.
Others used the media to agitate for trade sanctions against Japan in 1937-1938.
Bates and Fitch organized a group called the International Safety Committee, led by John Labe.
This is for the protection and management of displaced people in the safe zone.
In effect, the reality seems to be that the Chinese of the Red Swastika Society, led by American Christian priests, run it.
And the job is to submit their [protest letters and statements] to the Japanese military, Japanese consulates and special services, and [reports and petitions] to the U.S. and Germany.
The compilation of these is Ph.D. Shuhsi Hsu [documents-nanking-safety-zone].
They are not police officers. They are not master detectives like Hercule Poirot or Sherlock Holmes in the novels. They are just college professors and missionaries, and there are also supporters of terrorists.
I'm not an expert in [investigations], so I don't think we can determine whether or not it was a Japanese military action.
Probably, they should have judged it by eyewitnesses, bullets used, shoe prints, etc., but we have never been presented with detailed investigation data.
Probably not even Yale University.
There is no doubt that the defense forces began their escape and then the Japanese invaded.
As a prelude to the occupation policy, the search for the defeated soldiers and their [murder and capture] are considered a natural military action.
The records do not show that the defeated soldiers collectively [surrendered] their arms and surrendered in an orderly fashion to the Japanese.
The Chinese troops have taken off their uniforms and disguised themselves as civilians and fled to this safe zone, assisted by members of International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone.
In addition, on the 14th, there is also a description of Japanese soldiers being attacked from the direction of the safe zone.
The Japanese military is acting in accordance with international law.
Taking off one's uniform and hiding in a safe zone, rather than surrendering, is the same as a hostile act.
As long as the soldier is out of uniform, he is not recognized as a [POW].
"Herein lies the obligation and importance of wearing "military uniforms.
This is a violation of the principle of international law that separates soldiers and non-combatants.
To begin with, there are Japanese military records and Japanese soldier diaries that from the Battle of Shanghai, Chinese soldiers had already taken off their "uniforms" and fled, or carried out "attacks" in this state.
China has also ratified and issued [land warfare regulations]. In other words, the wearing of "military uniforms" is "obligatory".
Continuing this kind of act is also an act of ignoring the 'principle' of 'international law' of 'the principle of honesty'.
Even if the Japanese military commits "atrocities", they cannot be the only ones who have to abide by their "obligations" under international law.
Moreover, we believe that the neutrality of the safe zone was destroyed by the 14th attack. At least that's what the local command and soldiers at the time think.
That's why we launched a clearing operation in the safe zone. We made announcements in the safe zone to encourage people to surrender, and we "took" a few hundred or so people "prisoners".
And those "suspicious people" who did not surrender were "arrested".
They are killing some of them inside the castle and moving others outside the castle, towards Hsia Kwan.
They may or may not violate [international law].
But international law is "mutual" and "agreement". Only those who did not break it will not be bound by its obligations.
If there is a need, we will do what is necessary.
Even if this is called "terrible," it's a necessary action.
The behavior of the Chinese soldiers is what is the problem.
Incidentally, it is also known that John Labe, but when he hid a Chinese military officer to move from Nanjing to Shanghai, he accompanied him to escape.
Incidentally, it is also known that John Labbe-who hid a Chinese military officer and helped him escape from Nanjing to Shanghai by having him accompany him.
From China, it will be applauded by the Chinese, but from the Japanese side, it will be a despicable [enemy side people].
At that time, some people have the misconception that Japan and Nazi Germany were in a military alliance.
However, at the time of the Battle of Shanghai, Chinese troops were fighting against Japanese troops under the command of a military defense network created by Nazi Germany and under the command of Nazi military advisors.
Until the fall of Nanjing, it was Nazi Germany's army versus the Japanese.
A Nazi German consulate secretary named George Rosen hated the Japanese soldiers, calling them gorillas.
The defeated soldiers taken out of the safety zone, but there is no clear evidence that they were all "killed".
When journalists left Nanjing on the 15th, near the wharf in Hsia Kwan, they witnessed the "executions," but it seems that the journalists did not count the number. They write that there were 400 or 1,000 people. The location is also unclear.
It is not known whether these "Chinese" are "POWs," "uniforms," or "non-combatants".
The reporters preferred to report it as a "terrible act" before confirming its "legality".
Because of the "bad" and "impression" of Japan in the U.S. and elsewhere, we believe that sensationalism is more likely to attract attention and increase sales.
On the contrary, as for the "POW" story, it is known that on December 23, the accountants of the 16th Division used about 300 POWs to prepare for the distribution of food and other items to the Japanese troops in the warehouse of the flour mill in Hsia Kwan.
In this place, there was a sudden visit of the commander of the 16th Division, Lieutenant General Nakajima, and moreover, there was a POW waiting at the Chinese arms and ammunition stored in the warehouse. In some cases, this trooper was reprimanded on the spot, but later was rated audacious and daredevil fearless, and was promoted to one rank.
Members of the International Safety Committee, such real information naturally does not come in, and on the contrary, caused [emotional] wrangling with the Japanese military officials and became perceived by the Japanese military authorities as an adversary.
And furthermore, the information that can not be confirmed by the factual acts, from negative emotions, reported to the U.S. Embassy consulate and others, which came back in January.
The American consulate staff, while initially confirming that the museum was secure, had a bad impression of the Japanese troops due to information from Bates and other members of the International Safety Zone.
The Allison beating incident, for example, is typical, and while the Japanese soldier was rightly punished for having put Hooker in his quarters in violation of military law, it can only be said that Allison at the American consulate had a problem with the fact that her sense of justice was too high to act rationally.
Think about it for a moment. At that time, Chinese people were deprived of the necessities of life. There were no jobs.
What did American women do during the Great Depression when they were flooded with unemployment?
In the absence of work, they would have had no choice but to play hooker in order to support their families.
Even in post-war Japan, there were many private hookers against Americans. Even in Europe, when France was liberated, I know of women who were hookahs to Germans who were mistreated by other Frenchmen.
Back to the story, this Allison beating became known to the U.S. and has even become a diplomatic issue.
The other major incident that has become a diplomatic issue is the Panay incident. The sinking of the Panay was allegedly intentional, and many Americans were killed. In summary, the U.S. warship carrying people escaping from Nanking was sunk by an aircraft attack and a shore attack. For this incident, Japan settled its diplomatic relations by paying a formal [apology] and [compensation].
This also seems to have been expedient in worsening relations with the U.S., and seems to have been more than sufficient to make the Japanese military's "untruthful actions" perceived as true.
Later, Bates, a member of the International Safety Committee, provided information to Harold J. Timperley, an Australian-born journalist and reporter with considerable socialist leanings, and as of July, Victor Gollancz Ltd (a socialist, communist publisher) in the United Kingdom and India and other countries released a non-factual propaganda book on the Japanese military called What War Means.
Another American think tank that has been researching Asian intelligence since that time is the Institute of Pacific Relations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Pacific_Relations), which has been involved in lobbying the U.S. government. It does a lot of lobbying for the U.S. government. Although many Japanese participate in this think tank, it has been a Communist base since 1933, as stated in the Venona Documents, and the Asahi Shimbun reporter Ozaki Hidemi, who worked for Richard Sorge, who was arrested in 1941 for posing as a member of the Nazi party, was also involved in this think tank.
Moreover, most of the members of the International Security Committee are people who were paid by universities funded by Chiang Kai-shek, and even if they are not communists or spies, it is natural for human psychology to favor Chiang Kai-shek and the Chinese side.
As for the missionaries, they can't give the Japanese military any more influence in China.
They imputed to [the Japanese military's horrible actions] what they could not or would not check whether it was [true] or not.
And through the U.S. Foreign Ministry and media outlets such as the New York Times and Timperley, we believe that they spread "fake news" as an act of "conscience".
Bates testified at the Tokyo trial, but did not testify that he had witnessed any "massacre".
One more thing, by the following year, 1938, the members of the International Safety Committee allocated a special budget to have Lewis S. C. Smythe, one of the members and number two of the Society, conduct a "war damage study".
Smythe is a sociologist.
He gathered 20 students and used statistical methods rather than field research to collect sample data and make damage estimates.
That's what "War Damage in Nanking Area, Dec.1937 to March 1938,Urban and Rural Surveys" is about.
This report was submitted to the Tokyo Court, but it was not taken as evidence by the prosecution.
And it was not called as a witness either.
The reason for this is that it denied the mass murder and mass destruction claimed by the Allies in the Tokyo Court.
The reporters from the Chicago Daily News and The New York Times who published the initial report were also not called as witnesses.
Smythe's survey should have at least fielded the castle.
Because, according to calculations using statistical methods, Jouchi attributed 2,400 kills to the Japanese military. LOL!
I believe that this study did not eliminate the number of casualties [of Chinese soldiers fighting each other] in the castle.
And since the other areas include Japanese military combat zones, I have doubts that the survey was actually conducted.
Because if They had conducted a survey that was not approved by the Japanese military, we could have been mistaken for spies and killed or arrested.
Others, such as the questionnaires used when examining each of the regions in this study, have not been made public, which raises great suspicion.
You don't even know if it exists.
With the survey in mainland China, there is also the issue of literacy and possible language slippage due to dialects. It is unclear what kind of survey was conducted.
The basic data for this study is based on a research book by John Lossing Buck, ex-husband of novelist Pearl S. Buck of "The Land" fame, who received [funding from the Rockefeller Foundation] to study a range of 16,786 farm households in 308 provinces in 22 provinces over a period of [four years] 1929-33. It is created by.
The researcher] used graduates of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of Nanjing University (Jinling University) with professional training.
However, even at this time, when the fight against Military Factions and the Chinese Communist Party was going on, it is not clear if accurate data were available.
However, even at this time, Military Factions in various places were repeatedly engaged in combat activities with the National Revolutionary Army created with the support of the Soviet Union, led by Chiang Kai-shek.
It is not clear if accurate data was obtained.
In Smythe's report, Bates wrote a foreword, perhaps thinking that the number was too small for quicksand, and inserted the story of 10,000 "dead bodies" that were not in the statistics.
Inevitably, the "intent" that had to make the Japanese military "evil" can be seen there.
Another issue is the "rape" of non-combatant women, which is allegedly committed by Japanese soldiers.
Bates gives the impression that the Japanese military is "evil" by presenting an unsubstantiated figure of 20,000.
This figure was later disseminated to the present day and is considered one of the [terrible acts] of the Japanese military before the war.
However, not to deny everything, there are also records of soldiers being arrested and punished for rape as a violation of military discipline of Japanese soldiers.
Crimes that took place in an area with a dense population of 200,000 people, I believe that the crime rate must have been about the same as the current Japanese crime rate.
Just to note, there is something called "Wang Hsing-Lung", which exists as No. 28 of the [documents-nanking-safety-zone], there is a "Wang Hsing-Lung incident", and on December 31 the Japanese military asked for a meeting with the Safety Commission.
This was reported in an unnamed article in the New York Times on January 3.
Quote　--
Chinese Deserters found with refugees In U.S. Nanking Camp
[Copyright: 1938: By the New York Times.]
SHANGHAI, Jan. 3. --- American professors remaining at Ginling college in Nanking as foreign members of the refugee welfare committee were seriously embarrassed to discover that they had been harboring a deserting Chinese army colonel and six of his subordinate officers.
The Chinese officers, who had doffed their uniforms during the Chinese retreat from Nanking, were discovered living in one of the college buildings, They confessed their identity after Japanese army searchers found they had hidden six rifles, five revolvers and a dismounted machine gun and ammunition in the building.
The deserters confessed looting in Nanking and also that one night they dragged girls from the refugee camp into the darknesee and the next day blamed Japanese soldiers for the attacks. The ex-officers were arrested under martial law and probably will be excuted.
--
The Japanese claim that it was a Chinese military operation, but we don't really know.
But there are many young men among the Chinese soldiers, not all of them good, and we should assume that the crime rate in Nanjing is comparable to what can happen in China today.
But everything was foisted on the Japanese military as a [terrible act]. We can infer the "intent" of the missionaries, especially Bates, Magee, Fitch, Smythe, and others.
On Chiang Kai-shek's side, there is also a propaganda organization, of course, the aforementioned Institute of Pacific Relations, where Chen Hansheng (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_Hansheng) is also active, and　according to Matsuo Ichiro, a propaganda researcher of the Nanjing Incident, Chiang Kai-shek's propaganda organization has two lines of work.
For one, under the ROC government, there is a Kuomintang -> Central Propaganda Department (Foreign Propaganda Operation) -> International Propaganda Office.
The Central Propaganda Department was headed by Hollington Tong. Its subordinate organization, the International Propaganda Office, was headed by Zeng Xubai. It also had branches in Shanghai, Hong Kong, Kunming, New York, Chicago, Washington, San Francisco, London, Montreal, and Singapore.
The other is under the National Government, there is a Military Commission = > Politburo = > two agencies (planning the establishment of popular organizations) and three agencies (propaganda). This one is CCP-affiliated.
Guo Moruo is the director of the Three Offices, and he wrote the foreword in Timpari's What War Means.
The 7th Office (Hostile Propaganda) is a subordinate organization of the Sancho (Propaganda). Among its advisors were the Japanese communists Wataru Kaji and Kazuo Aoyama.
Nisha, as early as July 1938, in the propaganda book A True Record of Japanese Atrocities (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:A_True_Record_of_Japanese_ Atrocities published a book entitled "18 Bans").
If you look at the images on Wikipedia, you may have seen them at least once as evidence of the so-called Japanese military assault in Nanjing.
From the Battle of Shanghai to the Battle of Nanking, "Why did you do that? That's terrible/awful...! The images are all intended to create an "emotional" effect.
The people in the photos are different from the Japanese military uniforms.
Some of them are like "pin-ups".
Even the execution of Chinese Prisoners is included. (By Ichiro Matsuo.)
Inside, for some reason, there is a propaganda photo laced with propaganda photos of the Japanese military to assert the legitimacy of the battle against the Japanese people.
The photos show Japanese soldiers escorting Chinese noncombatants with an escort.
In the post-war Japanese Nanking controversy, there was an incident in which a scholar who claimed that the photo was evidence of the Japanese military's horrible actions was greatly embarrassed when another scholar pointed out that the photo was a Japanese photo described in an Asahi Shimbun-affiliated magazine.
The person who caused the great embarrassment was Professor Kasahara Tokusi, a renowned researcher of the Nanjing Incident in Japan. The person who pointed this out was Ikuhiko Hata.
During World War I, there is war propaganda spread by Britain and France.
It is not well known in Japan.
There are such reports as the Blythe Report by James Bryce, 1st Viscount Bryce, which was a British academic, jurist, historian, and Liberal politician.
It is a false report called the "Rape of Belgium".
In Japan, propaganda books such as "not samurai" are sold from Britain.
A division of the Japanese government agency has been studying this World War I propaganda in early January 1938 (after reports of the Nanking Incident), obtaining and studying analytical books published in Germany, England, etc. to study this World War I propaganda.
There are not that many analytical books published on the subject because of its content.
Such books include "baby skewers," "children with their arms cut off," and "stories of women in families who were raped and murdered.
Not all the acts committed by the Germans. That is false.
The only problematic behavior of Germany would be the destruction of neutral merchant ships.
At that time, in 1938, there is no doubt that the "Rape of Belgium" was accepted as fact by the majority of Japanese and people around the world.
Only some of the bureaucrats who did the research started collecting in January 1938, so we already know that it was "false".
However, there were many people in the Japanese government and in the Japanese military who were aware of the terrible things that the Japanese military had done at that time. That is an undoubted fact.
Even Christians in general felt this way.
Tadao Yanaihara, a professor at the University of Tokyo, criticized the Japanese military, referring to the Nanking Incident, in his speech at the church.
For that reason, he was fired from his position as a professor at the University of Tokyo.
After the war, he was reinstated by GHQ and became the president of the University of Tokyo.
At the time, it was inevitable to assume that what was reported in the press was the truth.
This is because people today can know information that was not available to people at that time.
In a letter exchange with Timpari on March 14, 1938, Bates wrote
Quote ---
They will be terribly angry, and there must be a scapegoat always.
Even the better Japanese remarably insulated against the depht and bredth of what the Army has done.
It's all passed off so nicely with a word about Belgium, or "all armies"
Incidently, if you know anything authoritative about the quantity of murder of civilians and so on in Belgium, including rape, I'd like it for comparative purposes.
I have marked some passages in my books for copying, but they are not comprehensive.
----
This text suggests that this person knows about [the murder of civilians in Belgium] in World War I and, yada, sees it as [fact].
Therefore, we can see that he is trying to prevent the Japanese military from "running away" from it as something that would happen in any other country.
Without Mr. Bates' conjecture and first-information reports such as the New York Times and Chicago Daily News, it would not have been accepted as fact in the United States.
Mr. Bates was actually considered by the Japanese to be pro-Japanese.
His wife and children are in Japan at the time of the Nanjing incident. And he had friendships with Japanese Christians and others.
Even if Bates and the members of the International Committee were to stop the Japanese military from fighting, the result was that Japan and the United States went to war.

This resulted in the deaths of many young men and women from both countries and other warring nations.
It is true that the lies of Mr. Bates and others were one of the reasons why so many young people died.
Later, near the end of the war with Japan, an atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan, which was a particularly Christian area.
This was a particularly Christian area in Japan.
And not only did they kill a lot of people, but they also destroyed Immaculate Conception Cathedral, Nagasaki.
It is impossible to gauge what Mr. Bates' feelings were when he subsequently appeared in the Tokyo trial.
Sometimes the smallest lie can magnify an irreversible tragedy.
I suspect that one such tragedy was the "lie" of Mr. Bates.

Finally, why "lies" is the following text found in the Bates Memo.
The Bates Memo covers the period up to the 15th when the reporters left the country, which is supposed to be the three days from the 13th to the 15th.
1. But in two days the whole outlook has been ruined by frequment murder, wholesale and semi-regular looting and uncontrolled disturbance of private homes including offenses against the security of women.
2. Any person who ran in fear or excitement, and any one who was caught in streets or alleys after dusk by roving partrols was likely to be killed on the spot.」
3. It proceeded in the Saftey Zone as well as elsewhere, and many cases are plainly witnessed by foreigners and by reputable Chinese.
1.Frequment murder," in their protest letter, states that the only "murders" they were aware of by December 15 were the six janitorial employees they claimed to have hired and one seriously injured.
2.The phrase "likely to be killed" is a possibility, not a murder.
3 is no one who is "witnessed by foreigners".
This point is very well documented in the aforementioned article by Toshio Matsumura.
I also point out the following as fake news by the New York Times.
The killing of civilians was widespread. N/A.
Policemen and firemen were speacial objects of attack. N/A.
Many slayings were witnessed by foreingers. N/A.
These things cannot be known to be in the mainland United States.
Even in Japan it is impossible to know the facts.
It's a completely different situation than today.
There is an assumption that a newspaper reporter would tell the facts.
But that's not the case.
Once these were accepted as facts, one wonders if the Japanese military in other areas or even the foreign ministry bureaucrats in Shanghai and Japan could not help but accept them as facts.
Like the fake news about Loch Ness monster inhabiting Loch Ness or blueberries being good for the eyes, the addition of numerous organizations spread and made "Why did you do that? became a fact. That's what we can call the essence of [the Nanjing Incident] [Nanking Massacre].
However, we believe that there were the usual "crimes" committed by Japanese soldiers.
The reason being that there will always be a certain number of fools.
I think there was also the problem of PTSD.
Having spent nearly a month marching side by side with death, you must have seen it in the Chinese soldiers at the same time.
This would be understandable to American soldiers who have participated in various American military operations in recent years.
Also, I believe that American police officers in the gun community will understand this as well.

In the next article, I will discuss 3.
I will discuss [3. the "killing" of a Chinese soldier who took off his uniform and the misidentified "killing" of a civilian].

Thank you for reading！