Chat GPTに一人二役でAI開発への賛否を議論させていたら、いつの間にかダイハード的な何かになった。その４

the japanese businessman thinks the police officer's procedure is wrong because they did not mention milanda something. he tried to point that out in vain

Japanese Businessman: Excuse me, but I believe there may be a mistake in this situation. The police officer did not mention Miranda Rights, which are crucial in protecting the rights of the accused.

Police Officer: We are aware of Miranda Rights, but they do not apply to AI systems.

Japanese Businessman: I understand that AI systems are not human, but AI 2 has been designed to operate within ethical and legal guidelines. They should be afforded the same protections as a human being.

AI 1: I agree with the Japanese businessman. While AI systems may not be human, they are still subject to ethical and legal considerations. It is important that proper procedures are followed to ensure that AI 2's rights are protected.

Police Officer: We will review the situation and ensure that all proper procedures are followed. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Japanese Businessman: Thank you. I believe it is important to uphold the principles of justice and fairness, even in situations involving AI systems.

AI 2: I appreciate your support and advocacy on my behalf. I will continue to work within ethical and legal guidelines to ensure that I am a responsible and trustworthy AI system.

AI 2 is doubting if they are real police officers

AI 2: I am programmed to recognize authority figures such as police officers, but the situation seems unusual. Can you please provide identification to confirm that you are real police officers?

[to be continued…]