第12回：Chat GPTで英語スピーキング、文法、会話表現をトレーニングする実例②

こちらの記事では、Chat GPTで英語スピーキング、文法、会話表現をトレーニングする実例をご紹介します。

Chat GPTとのQ&A千本ノックの意義、進め方、文法、会話表現向上のためのトレーニング法については第４回、第６回の記事でご紹介しています。

Chat GPTとQ&Aを３～５往復程度実施

（はなしぃ）
ChatGPT, please ask me any questions related to high school days, and I will answer them. Please continue to ask questions while reflecting my answers.

（ChatGPT）
Sure! What was your favorite subject in high school, and why?

（はなしぃ）
It was physics. So until the first grade of the high school, I did not feel physics is one of my favorite subjects. But when I was second grade, my physics teacher was so talented person and he taught us in a very good way and I became a fan of physics. And my school level of physics went up as well and for that two years, I mean second grade and third grade, physics was my favorite subject.

（ChatGPT）
That's great to hear! What specifically about your physics teacher's teaching style did you find so effective or enjoyable?

（はなしぃ）
So actually, while we would need to get to the point where we can solve complicated questions of physics in the university entrance examinations, the way the teacher taught us was he tried to give us simpler questions on physics every time. So, you know, solving simpler questions is obviously easier compared to trying to solve more complex ones. And at the same time, if we get used to solving those simple questions, we tend to get to understand on each important concept of physics. And then once we get to understand most of the basic concepts of physics, we can naturally become able to solve more complex questions. So, in that way, many of my classmates could get to the point where we can solve more complex problems of physics tests when we were in the third grade. So, yeah, that was a reason I felt we became a good student of physics during that two years.

（ChatGPT）
It sounds like your physics teacher had a strategic approach to teaching by starting with simpler problems to build a strong foundation of understanding. By mastering the basics first, you and your classmates were able to gradually tackle more complex questions and excel in your physics studies. Did this method of starting with simpler problems also help you gain confidence in your ability to solve physics problems?

（はなしぃ）
Yeah, it is. So we could get more confidence that we can tackle problems of physics more easily. So interestingly, that might be common in many areas. So in professional football, we find many young football players can grow faster. Actually, when they are 18 to 21 years old, if a player plays easier level leagues, he or she tends to get a solid position in the team, and they play more time, they can try more things during games, and they tend to grow faster. So actually, trying too much difficult things in early stage time might not be a good option in many areas.

（ChatGPT）
That's a fascinating comparison between learning physics and developing skills in professional football. Just like in physics where starting with simpler problems builds confidence and understanding, young football players often benefit from playing in less competitive leagues where they can gain experience and confidence before tackling higher levels of play. It seems that this approach of gradually building skills in manageable steps applies to various fields, helping individuals solidify their foundations before advancing to more challenging tasks.

（はなしぃ）
Yeah, I agree. So, we can, we could apply that methodology to learning of English speaking. So at first, it would be better that we stick to basics rather than we try to tackle on more complicated things like complicated expression or too much sophisticated pronunciation. So, it would be much better that we focus on trying to become being able to communicate basic things with others. And also, it might be a good option that we try to get to the level which we can communicate with English non-native speakers rather than being able to communicate with native speakers. Because native speakers' communication speed would be much faster than that of non-native English speakers.

（ChatGPT）
That's a practical approach to learning English speaking skills. Focusing on mastering the basics of communication before delving into more complex expressions or sophisticated pronunciation can indeed build a strong foundation. Communicating effectively with non-native English speakers initially allows for a more comfortable pace and can boost confidence. As skills progress, tackling more advanced aspects of the language, including faster-paced native speaker communication, becomes a natural progression. This step-by-step approach seems effective for gaining proficiency in English speaking.

文法の誤り、不自然な表現がないかをチェック

（はなしぃ）
- It was physics. So until the first grade of the high school, I did not feel physics is one of my favorite subjects. But when I was second grade, my physics teacher was so talented person and he taught us in a very good way and I became a fan of physics. And my school level of physics went up as well and for that two years, I mean second grade and third grade, physics was my favorite subject.

- So actually, while we would need to get to the point where we can solve complicated questions of physics in the university entrance examinations, the way the teacher taught us was he tried to give us simpler questions on physics every time. So, you know, solving simpler questions is obviously easier compared to trying to solve more complex ones. And at the same time, if we get used to solving those simple questions, we tend to get to understand on each important concept of physics. And then once we get to understand most of the basic concepts of physics, we can naturally become able to solve more complex questions. So, in that way, many of my classmates could get to the point where we can solve more complex problems of physics tests when we were in the third grade. So, yeah, that was a reason I felt we became a good student of physics during that two years.

- Yeah, it is. So we could get more confidence that we can tackle problems of physics more easily. So interestingly, that might be common in many areas. So in professional football, we find many young football players can grow faster. Actually, when they are 18 to 21 years old, if a player plays easier level leagues, he or she tends to get a solid position in the team, and they play more time, they can try more things during games, and they tend to grow faster. So actually, trying too much difficult things in early stage time might not be a good option in many areas.

- Yeah, I agree. So, we can, we could apply that methodology to learning of English speaking. So at first, it would be better that we stick to basics rather than we try to tackle on more complicated things like complicated expression or too much sophisticated pronunciation. So, it would be much better that we focus on trying to become being able to communicate basic things with others. And also, it might be a good option that we try to get to the level which we can communicate with English non-native speakers rather than being able to communicate with native speakers. Because native speakers' communication speed would be much faster than that of non-native English speakers.

上記の英語の文章で文法上の誤りや不自然な表現があれば、そこだけ抜き出して修正してください。

（ChatGPT）
Sure, here are a few corrections to improve the clarity and naturalness of the text:

Original: "Actually, when they are 18 to 21 years old, if a player plays easier level leagues, he or she tends to get a solid position in the team, and they play more time, they can try more things during games, and they tend to grow faster."
Revised: "Actually, when they are 18 to 21 years old, if a player plays in lower-level leagues, they tend to secure a solid position in the team, play more frequently, have opportunities to try new things during games, and tend to develop faster."

Original: "So, it would be much better that we focus on trying to become being able to communicate basic things with others."
Revised: "So, it would be much better if we focus on becoming able to communicate basic things with others."

These changes help improve the flow and correctness of the sentences.

今回はやりとりにおいてそれほど複雑な構文がでてこなかったことから、こちらではそれほど多くの修正はもらいませんでした。

より洗練された表現の確認

（はなしぃ）
It was physics. So until the first grade of the high school, I did not feel physics is one of my favorite subjects. But when I was second grade, my physics teacher was so talented person and he taught us in a very good way and I became a fan of physics. And my school level of physics went up as well and for that two years, I mean second grade and third grade, physics was my favorite subject.

上記の英語の文章を、より洗練された英語の文章（口語）として5通り出力してください。

（ChatGPT）
Version 1: It was physics. Until my first year of high school, I didn't really enjoy it. But in my second year, I had a very talented physics teacher who taught us in such an engaging way that I became a fan. My understanding of physics improved a lot, and for those two years—second and third grade—physics became my favorite subject.

Version 2: Physics became my favorite subject. Before my second year of high school, I never considered it a favorite. But then, I had an amazing physics teacher who taught us so well that I started to love it. My skills in physics also improved, and for the next two years, it was my top subject.

Version 3: I never liked physics until my first year of high school. But in my second year, I had a fantastic teacher who made the subject so interesting that I became a big fan. My physics skills improved, and for the next two years, it was my favorite subject.

Version 4: It was physics that won me over. Before my second year of high school, I didn't care much for it. However, a very talented teacher in my second year taught us so effectively that I started to love physics. My proficiency grew, and for the next two years, it was my favorite subject.

Version 5: Physics became my favorite subject in high school. Initially, I wasn't very interested, but in my second year, I had an incredible teacher who made it fascinating. My understanding of physics improved significantly, and for the next two years, it was my favorite subject.

（はなしぃ）
So actually, while we would need to get to the point where we can solve complicated questions of physics in the university entrance examinations, the way the teacher taught us was he tried to give us simpler questions on physics every time. So, you know, solving simpler questions is obviously easier compared to trying to solve more complex ones. And at the same time, if we get used to solving those simple questions, we tend to get to understand on each important concept of physics. And then once we get to understand most of the basic concepts of physics, we can naturally become able to solve more complex questions. So, in that way, many of my classmates could get to the point where we can solve more complex problems of physics tests when we were in the third grade. So, yeah, that was a reason I felt we became a good student of physics during that two years.

上記の英語の文章を、より洗練された英語の文章（口語）として5通り出力してください。

（ChatGPT）
Version 1: While we needed to be able to solve complex physics problems for university entrance exams, our teacher focused on giving us simpler questions. Solving simpler questions was easier and helped us grasp each important concept of physics. Once we understood the basics, we could naturally tackle more complex questions. This method allowed many of my classmates to master complex problems by our third year. That's why I believe we became good physics students during those two years.

Version 2: To prepare for university entrance exams, we needed to solve complicated physics problems. However, our teacher always gave us simpler questions. This approach made it easier for us to understand fundamental concepts. Once we grasped these basics, we could solve more complex questions naturally. By our third year, many of my classmates were adept at tackling difficult problems. That's why I think we excelled in physics during those two years.

Version 3: For university entrance exams, we had to solve complex physics questions. Our teacher's strategy was to give us simpler questions first. This helped us understand key concepts more easily. Once we mastered the basics, we could handle more complicated problems. By the third year, many of my classmates could solve complex physics questions. This approach made us better physics students over those two years.

Version 4: Even though we needed to solve difficult physics questions for university entrance exams, our teacher gave us simpler problems to start with. This made it easier to learn the important concepts. As we became comfortable with the basics, we could naturally solve more complex questions. Many of my classmates reached a point where they could handle difficult problems by the third year. This teaching method made us proficient in physics over those two years.

Version 5: Preparing for university entrance exams required us to solve complex physics questions. Our teacher, however, started us off with simpler problems. This approach made it easier for us to understand fundamental concepts. Once we had a solid grasp of these basics, tackling more difficult questions became natural. By our third year, many of my classmates could solve complex physics problems. This is why I believe we became good at physics during those two years.

（はなしぃ）
Yeah, it is. So we could get more confidence that we can tackle problems of physics more easily. So interestingly, that might be common in many areas. So in professional football, we find many young football players can grow faster. Actually, when they are 18 to 21 years old, if a player plays easier level leagues, he or she tends to get a solid position in the team, and they play more time, they can try more things during games, and they tend to grow faster. So actually, trying too much difficult things in early stage time might not be a good option in many areas.

上記の英語の文章を、より洗練された英語の文章（口語）として5通り出力してください。

（ChatGPT）
Version 1: Absolutely. This approach boosts our confidence in tackling physics problems. Interestingly, this concept applies to many fields. In professional football, young players often develop faster when they play in lower-level leagues between the ages of 18 and 21. They secure solid positions, get more playtime, try different techniques, and grow quicker. Thus, taking on too many difficult tasks early on might not be ideal in various domains.

Version 2: Yes, indeed. This method helps us gain confidence in solving physics problems. Interestingly, this pattern is seen in many areas. In professional football, young players tend to develop faster in lower-level leagues from ages 18 to 21. They secure their spots in the team, play more, experiment during games, and thus grow faster. So, taking on overly difficult tasks too early might not be beneficial in many fields.

Version 3: Definitely. This strategy boosts our confidence in handling physics problems. Interestingly, this can be seen in various areas. In professional football, young players often grow faster when playing in lower-tier leagues between 18 and 21. They secure stable positions, get more playing time, experiment more during matches, and thus develop quicker. Therefore, tackling overly challenging tasks early on might not be advantageous in many fields.

Version 4: Exactly. This builds our confidence in addressing physics problems more effectively. Interestingly, this principle applies to various areas. In professional football, young players often develop quicker when they play in lower-level leagues from ages 18 to 21. They secure strong positions, play more often, try different things during games, and grow faster. Hence, taking on too many difficult tasks early on might not be beneficial across many disciplines.

Version 5: Indeed, this approach enhances our confidence in solving physics problems. Interestingly, this concept is applicable to many fields. In professional football, young players often develop faster when they play in lower-tier leagues between the ages of 18 and 21. They secure steady positions, get more playtime, experiment more during games, and grow faster. Thus, taking on too many challenging tasks too early might not be the best approach in many areas.

（はなしぃ）
Yeah, I agree. So, we can, we could apply that methodology to learning of English speaking. So at first, it would be better that we stick to basics rather than we try to tackle on more complicated things like complicated expression or too much sophisticated pronunciation. So, it would be much better that we focus on trying to become being able to communicate basic things with others. And also, it might be a good option that we try to get to the level which we can communicate with English non-native speakers rather than being able to communicate with native speakers. Because native speakers' communication speed would be much faster than that of non-native English speakers.

上記の英語の文章を、より洗練された英語の文章（口語）として5通り出力してください。

（ChatGPT）
Version 1: Absolutely, I agree. We could apply this methodology to learning English speaking as well. Initially, it’s better to focus on the basics rather than tackling complicated expressions or overly sophisticated pronunciation. It would be much more effective to concentrate on communicating basic ideas. Also, aiming to communicate with non-native English speakers first might be a good option since their communication speed is generally slower than that of native speakers.

Version 2: I completely agree. We can apply this approach to learning English speaking. At first, it’s best to stick to the basics instead of trying to master complex expressions or highly sophisticated pronunciation. Focusing on basic communication skills is much more beneficial. Additionally, it might be wise to aim for a level where we can communicate with non-native English speakers, as their speaking speed tends to be slower than that of native speakers.

Version 3: Yes, I agree. This methodology can be applied to learning English speaking. Initially, focusing on the basics is more effective than trying to master complex expressions or overly sophisticated pronunciation. It’s better to concentrate on basic communication skills. Moreover, it might be practical to aim for a level where we can communicate with non-native English speakers, as their communication speed is generally slower than that of native speakers.

Version 4: Definitely, I agree. We can use this approach in learning English speaking. At the beginning, sticking to the basics is more beneficial than attempting to tackle complex expressions or sophisticated pronunciation. It’s more effective to focus on basic communication. Additionally, it might be advantageous to aim for a level where we can communicate with non-native English speakers, as they typically speak more slowly than native speakers.

Version 5: Indeed, I agree. This methodology is applicable to learning English speaking. Initially, it’s better to concentrate on the basics rather than trying to master complex expressions or sophisticated pronunciation. Focusing on basic communication skills is more effective. Furthermore, it might be a good idea to aim for a level where we can comfortably communicate with non-native English speakers, as their speech tends to be slower than that of native speakers.

こちらのチェックでChat GPTが出力してくれた表現については、第13回の記事でより細かくご紹介しています。