Essay-1 Agree or disagree: it is attainable to stop the use of nuclear weapon.

The debate on whether or not humans can abandon nuclear weapons as a tool for threatening their counterparts has been stirred among us for a long time. I think it is impossible to prevent an atrocious human being readily from our history and current situation.

One justification to support my view is that the world has never learned the history of Hiroshima, Japan where is the only victim of nuclear weapons. In addition, the aggravating fight is still rambling like the invasion of Ukraine nowadays. It seems that people may underestimate the effect of the weapons, and even though the Japanese don't know well about it the number of victims is decreasing.

Furthermore, some people still believe that the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was effective to cause Japan to surrender. The discrepancy of recognition for war affects their army system and installing weapons.

Secondly, there is the fact that not only Russia but also some the country are still holding nuclear weapons as a deterrent. These days, the United Nations and the other international union have tried to align their policy to prohibit to keep of such ammunition. However, it often doesn't work when even only one country disagrees with it because most of them will lose their deterrent from the country still have.

Overall, despite recent diplomatic corporation among some countries, it is too hard to eradicate nuclear weapons but we must not stop discussing to attain a peaceful world. (240 words)

Source: Twitter@toeic0214
https://twitter.com/toeic0214/status/1647054579069243392?s=20